The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Microbiological Fractionation of Sulphur Isotopes
Abstract
SUMMARY: A fractionation of sulphur isotopes was found in all metabolic processes investigated except those in which elemental sulphur was the starting substrate for growth of Thiobacillus concretivorus and Chromatium sp. and for reduction by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Except for polythionates formed during sulphide oxidation by T. concretivorus or Chromatium sp., the products of metabolism were enriched in 32S relative to the starting substrates. The magnitudes of the enrichment differed for different processes and for the same overall process carried out by different organisms. The δ34S values (%0) ranged from -46·0 for sulphide from sulphate reduction by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans to +19·0 for polythionate formed during growth on sulphide by T. concretivorus. Fractionation during sulphate reduction was inversely proportional to rate of reduction when lactate and ethanol were electron donors and directly proportional with molecular hydrogen as the electron donor. Temperature and sulphate concentration, within the normal physiological ranges of these parameters, influenced fractionation only in so far as they influenced rate of reduction. However, anomalous fractionation effects were obtained at low temperatures and when a resting suspension reducing sulphite was subjected to changes in temperature. The data are discussed with reference to the mechanism(s) of fractionation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Neoproterozoic oxygenation event: Environmental perturbations and biogeochemical cycling
Och, L. M., & Shields-Zhou, G. A. (2012) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.09.004 · Cited by 646
Isotopic evidence for microbial sulphate reduction in the early Archaean era
Shen, Y., Buick, R., & Canfield, D. E. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35065071 · Cited by 620
The Production of 34 S-Depleted Sulfide During Bacterial Disproportionation of Elemental Sulfur
Canfield, D. E., & Thamdrup, B. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.11540246 · Cited by 607
Isotope fractionation by natural populations of sulfate-reducing bacteria
Canfield, D. E. (2001) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(00)00584-6 · Cited by 512
The Archean Sulfur Cycle and the Early History of Atmospheric Oxygen
Canfield, D. E., Habicht, K. S., & Thamdrup, B. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5466.658 · Cited by 497
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaplan, I. R., & Rittenberg, S. C.
- Venue
- Journal of General Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1964-02-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-212
- ISSN
- 0022-1287 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060617303
- Cited by
- 858
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbiological Fractionation of Sulphur Isotopes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00221287-34-2-195
- The paper
- Kaplan, I. R., & Rittenberg, S. C. (1964). Microbiological Fractionation of Sulphur Isotopes. Journal of General Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-34-2-195
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.