Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 220

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Treatment of experimental infections of mice with bacteriophages

SOOTHILL, J. S.·1992·Journal of Medical Microbiology

Abstract

Bacteriophages for Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus were tested in experimental infections of mice to investigate their potential for the treatment of infections of man. As few as 10(2) particles of an acinetobacter phage protected mice against 5 LD50 (1 x 10(8)) of a virulent strain of A. baumanii, and phage was demonstrated to have multiplied in the mice. A pseudomonas phage protected mice against 5 LD50 of a virulent strain of P. aeruginosa, with a PD50 of 1.2 x 10(7) particles. A staphylococcal phage failed to protect mice infected with a strain of S. aureus. These studies support the view that bacteriophages could be useful in the treatment of human infections caused by antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/00222615-37-4-258

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
SOOTHILL, J. S.
Venue
Journal of Medical Microbiology
Published
1992-10-01
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
258-261
ISSN
  • 0022-2615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-5644
OpenAlex
W2071250637
Cited by
220
References
0
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of experimental infections of mice with bacteriophages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00222615-37-4-258
The paper
SOOTHILL, J. S. (1992). Treatment of experimental infections of mice with bacteriophages. Journal of Medical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00222615-37-4-258

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.