Comparison of three molecular typing methods in studies of transmission of Porphyromonas gingivalis
Abstract
Porphyromonas gingivalis is associated strongly with severe periodontitis, but little information is available on possible transmission routes of this species. This study evaluated three DNA-based molecular typing methods for use in epidemiological surveys of P. gingivalis. In total, 32 isolates from eight married couples were investigated by: (i) restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) of whole chromosomal DNA; (ii) hybridisation of DNA fragments with ribosomal DNA (ribotyping); and (iii) amplification of DNA by the polymerase chain reaction with arbitrary primers (AP-PCR). The data obtained with the three methods were in broad agreement: in six of the eight couples, the isolates from husband and wife were indistinguishable, but isolates from unrelated individuals showed distinct types with all three methods. For some isolates, minor differences in REA pattern were obtained which could not be correlated with differences in ribotype or AP-PCR type. Ribotyping showed differences between isolates from one individual, which were indistinguishable with the other two methods. The patterns obtained with ribotyping or AP-PCR were simple in comparison to the relatively complex REA patterns. Although all three methods were concordant, AP-PCR was found to be the least time-consuming method. The data support the suggestion that P. gingivalis can be transmitted between spouses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Oral bacteria are transferred vertically from primary caregiver(s) in early childhood and horizontally between family members later in life.
“In addition, oral bacteria are transferred vertically from the primary caregiver(s) in early childhood18 and horizontally between family members later in life18,19, making archaeological dental calculus a potentially unique means of tracing population structure, movement and admixture between ancient cultures, as well as the spread of diseases.”
From Sequencing ancient calcified dental plaque shows changes in oral microbiota with dietary shifts of the Neolithic and Industrial revolutions (2013) · cites this paper as [19]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 39
- Authors
- van Steenbergen, T. J. M., Menard, C., Tijhof, C. J., Mouton, C., & de Graaff, J.
- Affiliations
- Université Laval (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Mouton, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1993-12-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 416-421
- ISSN
- 0022-2615 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-5644
- OpenAlex
- W2168674064
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Oral and gingival health research
- Keywords
- Porphyromonas gingivalis, bacterial transmission, periodontitis, restriction endonuclease analysis, ribotyping, method comparison, epidemiological typing
- MeSH terms
- Prohibitins, Adult, Base Sequence, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Ribosomal, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Humans, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Periodontitis, Restriction Mapping, Reproducibility of Results, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Bacteroidaceae Infections, Porphyromonas gingivalis, DNA Primers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review