Cited by 11Mycobacterium research and diagnosisTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

Strain-specific variation in the dnaJ gene of mycobacteria

VICTOR, T. C., JORDAAN, A. M., VAN SCHALKWYK, E. J., COETZEE, G. J., VAN HELDEN, P. D.·1996·Journal of Medical Microbiology

Abstract

The polymerase chain reaction-single strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) technique was evaluated for species identification among mycobacteria by analysis of the dnaJ gene. Nine clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with different fingerprint patterns all gave the same distinct SSCP banding pattern and could be distinguished from other mycobacteria, such as M. avium. In contrast, considerable strain-specific dnaJ gene variations were observed amongst 42 clinical isolates of M. avium and 13 other atypical mycobacterial strains. Only 62% of the M. avium isolates hybridised to an M. avium-specific probe and only 14% could be identified correctly as M. avium by both probe and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. This finding was supported by direct sequence analysis. Variations were also observed in M. gordonae and M. scrofulaceum isolates. Computerised analysis of M. avium samples broadly identified three clusters. Results suggest that although the SSCP procedure may be useful for distinguishing M. tuberculosis from other mycobacteria, this technique applied to the dnaJ gene may not be suitable for strain identification. The results stress the importance of testing a large collection of clinical isolates before new molecular procedures are introduced into routine laboratories.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/00222615-44-5-332

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 17 · Cited by 11

Authors
VICTOR, T. C., JORDAAN, A. M., VAN SCHALKWYK, E. J., COETZEE, G. J., & VAN HELDEN, P. D.
Affiliations
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • South African Institute for Medical Research (ZA)
Corresponding author
VICTOR, T. C.
Venue
Journal of Medical Microbiology
Published
1996-05-01
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
332-339
ISSN
  • 0022-2615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-5644
OpenAlex
W2106332785
Cited by
11
References
17
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Keywords
dnaJ gene, mycobacteria, species identification, strain-specific variation, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium avium, nontuberculous mycobacteria, Mycobacterium gordonae, Mycobacterium scrofulaceum, PCR-SSCP, restriction fragment length polymorphism, DNA fingerprinting, clinical isolates
MeSH terms
Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, Genes, Bacterial, Heat-Shock Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Mycobacterium, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, Species Specificity, DNA Probes, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational, HSP40 Heat-Shock Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review