The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The distribution of Clostridium difficile in the environment of South Wales
Abstract
A large study of the distribution of Clostridium difficile in the environment of the Cardiff area of South Wales was performed with a methodology designed to maximise recovery. A total of 2580 samples was taken, with 184 (7.1%) yielding isolates. The highest yield for C. difficile was obtained from river waters, with 14 (87.5%) of 16 samples from four rivers positive, and from sea water samples with 7 (44%) of 15 positive from six beaches on the Bristol Channel. In addition, 7 (46.7%) of 15 samples of lake water were also positive. Twenty-two (21%) of 104 soil samples, taken from random sites in Cardiff, were positive, as were 20% of environmental samples from four Cardiff hospitals. C. difficile was also isolated from 50% of eight swimming pool waters examined and 1 (5.5%) of 18 of mains tap water. Carriage of C. difficile in 524 faecal samples of assorted farm animals was c. 1%, and was 10% in dogs and 2% in cats. In private residences, the organism was present in 12 (2.2%) of 550 samples. While 2.4% of 300 raw vegetable samples were positive, none of 107 assorted fish gut contents was. These findings indicate that C. difficile may be more widely distributed in the general environment, particularly water, than was previously thought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections
Surawicz, C. M., Brandt, L. J., Binion, D. G., Ananthakrishnan, A. N., Curry, S. R., Gilligan, P. H., McFarland, L. V., Mellow, M., & Zuckerbraun, B. S. (2013) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2013.4 · Cited by 1,645
Clostridium difficile infection: new developments in epidemiology and pathogenesis
Rupnik, M., Wilcox, M. H., & Gerding, D. N. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2164 · Cited by 1,380
The Gut Microbiota of Marine Fish
Egerton, S., Culloty, S., Whooley, J., Stanton, C., & Ross, R. P. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00873 · Cited by 963
Selective pressure of antibiotic pollution on bacteria of importance to public health
Tello, A., Austin, B., & Telfer, T. C. (2012) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1104650 · Cited by 383
Clostridium difficile infection: epidemiology, diagnosis and understanding transmission
Martin, J. S. H., Monaghan, T. M., & Wilcox, M. H. (2016) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2016.25 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Al Saif, N., & BRAZIER, J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1996-08-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-137
- ISSN
- 0022-2615 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-5644
- OpenAlex
- W2157948849
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The distribution of Clostridium difficile in the environment of South Wales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00222615-45-2-133
- The paper
- Al Saif, N., & BRAZIER, J. S. (1996). The distribution of Clostridium difficile in the environment of South Wales. Journal of Medical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00222615-45-2-133
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.