Cited by 73Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFungal and yeast genetics research

Anti-Candida activity of a novel killer toxin from the yeast Williopsis mrakii

Hodgson, Valerie J., Button, David, Walker, Graeme M.·1995·Microbiology

Abstract

A screening of putative killer yeast strains showed that spore-forming ascomycetous yeasts of the genera Pichia and Williopsis displayed the broadest range of activity against sensitive strains of Candida spp. and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Williopsis mrakii(NCYC 500) showed extensive anti-Candida activity against strains isolated from clinical specimens.W. mrakii killer factor was produced in minimal media as a function of growth and its activity reached constant levels as cells entered stationary phase. The proteinaceous killer toxin was found to be unstable outwith a specific range of temperature and pH (above 30 �C and pH 4�0), and further analysis showed that the active toxin molecule was an acidic polypeptide with a relative molecular mass between 1�8-5�0 kDa. At critical concentrations the killer factor exerted a greater effect on stationary phase cells of Candida than cells from an exponential phase of growth. At low concentrations, the killer toxin produced a fungistatic effect on sensitive yeasts but at higher concentrations there was evidence to suggest that membrane damage accounted for the zymocidal effects of the killer factor. The cidal nature of the toxin was reflected in a rapid decrease in sensitive cell viability. Findings presented suggest that W. mrakii killer toxin has potential as a novel antimycotic agent in combatting medically important strains of Candida.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/13500872-141-8-2003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hodgson, V. J., Button, D., & Walker, G. M.
Affiliations
Abertay University (GB)
Corresponding author
Walker, Graeme M.
Venue
Microbiology
Published
1995-08-01
Volume
141
Issue
8
Pages
2003-2012
ISSN
  • 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-2080
OpenAlex
W2104262753
Cited by
73
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
killer toxin, anti-Candida activity, Candida, Pichia, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, acidic polypeptides, stationary phase, membrane damage, fungistatic activity, antifungal agents, clinical isolates
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Candida, Cell Membrane Permeability, Chromatography, Gel, Culture Media, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Saccharomycetales, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Time Factors, Toxins, Biological, Yeasts, Colony Count, Microbial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review