Cited by 75Microbial metabolism and enzyme functionGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFermentation and Sensory Analysis

Acetobacter fabarum sp. nov., an acetic acid bacterium from a Ghanaian cocoa bean heap fermentation

Cleenwerck, I., Gonzalez, A., Camu, N., Engelbeen, K., De Vos, P., De Vuyst, L.·2008·INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY

Abstract

Six acetic acid bacterial isolates, obtained during a study of the microbial diversity of spontaneous fermentations of Ghanaian cocoa beans, were subjected to a polyphasic taxonomic study. (GTG)(5)-PCR fingerprinting grouped the isolates together, but they could not be identified using this method. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences allocated the isolates to the genus Acetobacter and revealed Acetobacter lovaniensis, Acetobacter ghanensis and Acetobacter syzygii to be nearest neighbours. DNA-DNA hybridizations demonstrated that the isolates belonged to a single novel genospecies that could be differentiated from its phylogenetically nearest neighbours by the following phenotypic characteristics: no production of 2-keto-D-gluconic acid from D-glucose; growth on methanol and D-xylose, but not on maltose, as sole carbon sources; no growth on yeast extract with 30% D-glucose; and weak growth at 37 degrees C. The DNA G+C contents of four selected strains were 56.8-58.0 mol%. The results obtained prove that the isolates should be classified as representatives of a novel Acetobacter species, for which the name Acetobacter fabarum sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is strain 985(T) (=R-36330(T) =LMG 24244(T) =DSM 19596(T)).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/ijs.0.65778-0

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cleenwerck, I., Gonzalez, A., Camu, N., Engelbeen, K., De Vos, P., & De Vuyst, L.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Venue
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY
Published
2008-09-01
Volume
58
Issue
9
Pages
2180-2185
ISSN
  • 1466-5026 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-5034
OpenAlex
W2127619309
Cited by
71
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  • Vlaamse regering
  • Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial metabolism and enzyme function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Keywords
novel bacterial species
MeSH terms
Acetobacter, Methanol, Base Composition, Cacao, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Ribosomal, Food Microbiology, Ghana, Glucose, Maltose, Molecular Sequence Data, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Peptones, Phylogeny, RNA, Bacterial, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid, Sugar Acids, Xylose, Bacterial Typing Techniques, Cluster Analysis, Polymerase Chain Reaction, DNA Fingerprinting, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Acetic Acid, Genes, rRNA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review