The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes
Open accessAbstract
The field of microbial taxonomy is dynamic, aiming to provide a stable and contemporary classification system for prokaryotes. Traditionally, reliance on phenotypic characteristics limited the comprehensive understanding of microbial diversity and evolution. The introduction of molecular techniques, particularly DNA sequencing and genomics, has transformed our perception of prokaryotic diversity. In the past two decades, advancements in genome sequencing have transitioned from traditional methods to a genome-based taxonomic framework, not only to define species, but also higher taxonomic ranks. As technology and databases rapidly expand, maintaining updated standards is crucial. This work seeks to revise the 2018 guidelines for applying genome sequencing data in microbial taxonomy, adapting minimal standards and recommendations to reflect technological progress during this period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
[Retracted] A Comprehensive Review of Performance of Next‐Generation Sequencing Platforms
Pervez, M. T., Hasnain, M. J. U., Abbas, S. H., Moustafa, M., Aslam, N., & Shah, S. S. M. (2022) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2022/3457806 · Cited by 164
RetractedIQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era
Minh, B. Q., Schmidt, H. A., Chernomor, O., Schrempf, D., Woodhams, M. D., von Haeseler, A., & Lanfear, R. (2020) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaa015 · Cited by 16,873
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P., & Tyson, G. W. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.186072.114 · Cited by 12,496
Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information: update
Wheeler, D. L. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh073 · Cited by 10,641
Yoon, S.-H., Ha, S.-M., Kwon, S., Lim, J., Kim, Y., Seo, H., & Chun, J. (2017) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.001755 · Cited by 7,702
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. I. Accuracy Assessment
Ewing, B., Hillier, L., Wendl, M. C., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.175 · Cited by 6,967
Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions
Meier-Kolthoff, J. P., Auch, A. F., Klenk, H.-P., & Göker, M. (2013) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-60 · Cited by 6,755
Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition
Richter, M., & Rosselló-Móra, R. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0906412106 · Cited by 6,359
Manni, M., Berkeley, M. R., Seppey, M., Simão, F. A., & Zdobnov, E. M. (2021) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msab199 · Cited by 6,187
High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries
Jain, C., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Phillippy, A. M., Konstantinidis, K. T., & Aluru, S. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9 · Cited by 5,748
Metadata
- Authors
- Riesco, R., & Trujillo, M. E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2024-03-21
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1466-5026 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-5034
- OpenAlex
- W4393035934
- Cited by
- 579
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 67.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/ijsem.0.006300
- The paper
- Riesco, R., & Trujillo, M. E. (2024). Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.006300
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
