The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antimicrobial activities of silver dressings: an in vitro comparison
Abstract
A range of silver-coated or -impregnated dressings are now commercially available for use but comparative data on their antimicrobial efficacies are limited. The antibacterial activities of five commercially available silver-coated/impregnated dressings were compared against nine common burn-wound pathogens, namely methicillin-sensitive and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus vulgaris, Acinetobacter baumannii and a multi-drug-efflux-positive Acinetobacter baumannii (BM4454), using a broth culture method. The rapidity and extent of killing of these pathogens under in vitro conditions were evaluated. All five silver-impregnated dressings investigated exerted bactericidal activity, particularly against Gram-negative bacteria, including Enterobacter species, Proteus species and E. coli. The spectrum and rapidity of action, however, ranged widely for different dressings. Acticoat and Contreet had a broad spectrum of bactericidal activities against both Gram-positive and -negative bacteria. Contreet was characterized by a very rapid bactericidal action and achieved a reduction of ⩾10 000 c.f.u. ml−1 in the first 30 min for Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus vulgaris, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumanii. Other dressings demonstrated a narrower range of bactericidal activities. Understanding the characteristics of these dressings may enable them to be targeted more appropriately according to the specific requirements for use of a particular dressing, as in for prophylaxis in skin grafting or for an infected wound with MRSA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
You, C., Han, C., Wang, X., Zheng, Y., Li, Q., Hu, X., & Sun, H. (2012) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-012-1792-8 · Cited by 447
Parvekar, P., Palaskar, J., Metgud, S., Maria, R., & Dutta, S. (2020) · Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry · doi:10.1080/26415275.2020.1796674 · Cited by 426
Silver dressings: their role in wound management
Leaper, D. J. (2006) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-481x.2006.00265.x · Cited by 414
The antifungal activity of graphene oxide–silver nanocomposites
Li, C., Wang, X., Chen, F., Zhang, C., Zhi, X., Wang, K., & Cui, D. (2013) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.001 · Cited by 279
Arab, M. M., Yadollahi, A., Hosseini-Mazinani, M., & Bagheri, S. (2014) · Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jgeb.2014.10.002 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Ip, M., Lui, S. L., Poon, V. K. M., Lung, I., & Burd, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-63
- ISSN
- 0022-2615 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-5644
- OpenAlex
- W2125697213
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial activities of silver dressings: an in vitro comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/jmm.0.46124-0
- The paper
- Ip, M., Lui, S. L., Poon, V. K. M., Lung, I., & Burd, A. (2006). Antimicrobial activities of silver dressings: an in vitro comparison. Journal of Medical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.46124-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.