Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 226

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The bacteriology of biopsies differs between newly diagnosed, untreated, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients

Bibiloni, Rodrigo, Mangold, Marco, Madsen, Karen L., Fedorak, Richard N., Tannock, Gerald W.·2006·Journal of Medical Microbiology

Abstract

The bacterial community (microbiota) that inhabits the gut of humans appears to be an important source of antigens that drive the chronic immunological processes characteristic of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Most of the members of the microbiota have not yet been cultured, but nucleic-acid-based methods of detection and enumeration can provide information about the community. This investigation used these methods to obtain information about the bacteria associated with mucosal surfaces in the gut of 20 CD and 15 UC patients. Biopsies were collected from inflamed and non-inflamed sites in the intestines of newly diagnosed, untreated patients. Biopsies were also collected from several intestinal sites of 14 healthy subjects. The bacterial collections associated with the biopsies were analysed by generating PCR/denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles, the preparation of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries, and qualitative PCR to detect specific groups of bacteria. The total numbers of bacteria associated with the biopsies were determined by real-time quantitative PCR. DGGE profiles generated from the terminal ileum and various colonic regions were characteristic of each individual but differed between subjects. DGGE profiles and 16S rRNA gene libraries showed that the bacteria associated with inflamed and non-inflamed tissues did not differ. UC patients had more bacteria associated with biopsies than did CD patients (P<0.01). Statistical analysis of the composition of 16S rRNA gene libraries showed that the bacterial collections in UC and CD patients differed (P<0.05). Unclassified members of the phylum Bacteroidetes were more prevalent in CD than in UC patients. Therefore, the types and numbers of bacteria associated with biopsy samples were distinctly different for UC and CD patients. The observations made in this study should permit targeting of specific bacteriological abnormalities in investigations of the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases and provide targets for medical interventions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/jmm.0.46498-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 226

Metadata

Authors
Bibiloni, R., Mangold, M., Madsen, K. L., Fedorak, R. N., & Tannock, G. W.
Venue
Journal of Medical Microbiology
Published
2006-08-01
Volume
55
Issue
8
Pages
1141-1149
ISSN
  • 0022-2615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-5644
OpenAlex
W2105190780
Cited by
226
References
1
FWCI
9.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The bacteriology of biopsies differs between newly diagnosed, untreated, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/jmm.0.46498-0
The paper
Bibiloni, R., Mangold, M., Madsen, K. L., Fedorak, R. N., & Tannock, G. W. (2006). The bacteriology of biopsies differs between newly diagnosed, untreated, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients. Journal of Medical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.46498-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.