The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy of common hospital biocides with biofilms of multi-drug resistant clinical isolates
Abstract
The hospital environment is particularly susceptible to contamination by bacterial pathogens that grow on surfaces in biofilms. The effects of hospital biocides on two nosocomial pathogens, meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, growing as free-floating (planktonic) and adherent biofilm populations (sessile) were examined. Clinical isolates of MRSA and P. aeruginosa were grown as biofilms on discs of materials found in the hospital environment (stainless steel, glass, polyethylene and Teflon) and treated with three commonly used hospital biocides containing benzalkonium chloride (1 % w/v), chlorhexidine gluconate (4 % w/v) and triclosan (1 % w/v). Cell viability following biocide treatment was determined using an XTT assay and the LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability kit. The minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of all biocides for planktonic populations of both organisms was considerably less than the concentration recommended for use by the manufacturer. However, when isolates were grown as biofilms, the biocides were ineffective at killing bacteria at the concentrations recommended for use. Following biocide treatment, 0-11 % of cells in MRSA biofilms survived, and up to 80 % of cells in P. aeruginosa biofilms survived. This study suggests that although biocides may be effective against planktonic populations of bacteria, some biocides currently used in hospitals are ineffective against nosocomial pathogens growing as biofilms attached to surfaces and fail to control this reservoir for hospital-acquired infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically
Ferraro, M. J. (2000) · Cited by 16,875
Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms
Donlan, R. M., & Costerton, J. W. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002 · Cited by 6,644
Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents
Mah, T.-F. C., & O'Toole, G. A. (2001) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01913-2 · Cited by 3,921
Lewis, K. (2001) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.45.4.999-1007.2001 · Cited by 1,980
Microbial pathogenesis in cystic fibrosis: mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia
Govan, J. R. W., & Deretic, V. P. (1996) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.60.3.539-574.1996 · Cited by 1,812
Diekema, D. J., Pfaller, M. A., Schmitz, F. J., Smayevsky, J., Bell, J., Jones, R. N., Beach, M., & SENTRY Participants Group (2001) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/320184 · Cited by 1,362
Biofilms, the customized microniche
Costerton, J. W., Lewandowski, Z., DeBeer, D., Caldwell, D., Korber, D., & James, G. (1994) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.176.8.2137-2142.1994 · Cited by 1,002
Spoering, A. L., & Lewis, K. (2001) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.183.23.6746-6751.2001 · Cited by 902
Survival of Enterococci and Staphylococci on Hospital Fabrics and Plastic
Neely, A. N., & Maley, M. P. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.38.2.724-726.2000 · Cited by 794
Biofilm Formation and Control in Food Processing Facilities
Chmielewski, R. A. N., & Frank, J. F. (2003) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/j.1541-4337.2003.tb00012.x · Cited by 778
Cited by
Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a formidable and ever-present adversary
Kerr, K. G., & Snelling, A. M. (2009) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.020 · Cited by 549
Kampf, G. (2016) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2016.08.018 · Cited by 370
Candida auris: Disinfectants and Implications for Infection Control
Ku, T. S. N., Walraven, C. J., & Lee, S. A. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00726 · Cited by 177
Verdial, C., Serrano, I., Tavares, L., Gil, S., & Oliveira, M. (2023) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines11041221 · Cited by 71
Infection Control Measures against Candidaauris in Healthcare Facilities
Alfouzan, W. A., Dhar, R., Alabbad, J., & Rabaan, A. A. (2022) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr10081625 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, K., & Hunter, I. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2008-08-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 966-973
- ISSN
- 0022-2615 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-5644
- OpenAlex
- W2163926674
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of common hospital biocides with biofilms of multi-drug resistant clinical isolates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/jmm.0.47668-0
- The paper
- Smith, K., & Hunter, I. S. (2008). Efficacy of common hospital biocides with biofilms of multi-drug resistant clinical isolates. Journal of Medical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.47668-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.