The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Self versus non-self: fungal cell wall degradation in Trichoderma
Open accessAbstract
Lysis of the prey's cell wall is one of the key steps during mycoparasitism. Genome analysis of two mycoparasitic Trichoderma species, T. atroviride and T. virens, revealed an expanded arsenal of genes encoding enzymes potentially involved in cell wall hydrolysis. Glycoside hydrolase family 18, which contains all fungal chitinases, is the largest family of carbohydrate-active enzymes in mycoparasitic Trichoderma species. However, in addition to their aggressive functions during mycoparasitism, the roles of chitinases and other cell wall degrading enzymes also include remodelling and recycling of the fungus's own cell wall. In this review we discuss current knowledge about fungal cell wall degrading enzymes in Trichoderma and how the fungus distinguishes between self- and non-self fungal cell wall degradation. In the past few years, the chitinolytic enzyme machinery of Trichoderma has been used as a model system to address this question. Gene expression profiles of most investigated chitinases indicate an overlap of functions of the respective enzymes and an involvement in both self- and non-self fungal cell wall degradation. Similar sets of enzymes appear to be involved in mycoparasitism, exogenous chitin decomposition and recycling of the fungus's own cell wall. Thus, we hypothesize that the regulation of self and non-self fungal cell wall degradation is not due to a speciation of individual chitinases. Rather, we hypothesize that it is regulated by substrate accessibility due to cell wall protection in healthy hyphae vs deprotection during mycoparasitic attack, hyphal ageing and autolysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fungal chitinases: function, regulation, and potential roles in plant/pathogen interactions
Langner, T., & Göhre, V. (2016) · Current Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00294-015-0530-x · Cited by 225
Chitinases: in agriculture and human healthcare
Nagpure, A., Choudhary, B., & Gupta, R. K. (2014) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.3109/07388551.2013.790874 · Cited by 145
Multi-omics characterization of the necrotrophic mycoparasite Saccharomycopsis schoenii
Junker, K., Chailyan, A., Hesselbart, A., Forster, J., & Wendland, J. (2019) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1007692 · Cited by 34
Sriwattanachai, S., Sadiq, M. B., & Anal, A. K. (2018) · Journal of Food Processing and Preservation · doi:10.1111/jfpp.13400 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Gruber, S., & Seidl-Seiboth, V.
- Venue
- Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2012-01-01
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-34
- ISSN
- 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2080
- OpenAlex
- W2037052785
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.