The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Poly-γ-glutamic acid: production, properties and applications
Abstract
Poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) is a naturally occurring biopolymer made up of repeating units of l-glutamic acid, d-glutamic acid or both. γ-PGA can exhibit different properties (conformational states, enantiomeric properties and molecular mass). Owing to its biodegradable, non-toxic and non-immunogenic properties, it has been used successfully in the food, medical and wastewater industries. Amongst other novel applications, it has the potential to be used for protein crystallization, as a soft tissue adhesive and a non-viral vector for safe gene delivery. This review focuses on the production, properties and applications of γ-PGA. Each application of γ-PGA utilizes specific properties attributed to various forms of γ-PGA. As a result of its growing applications, more strains of bacteria need to be investigated for γ-PGA production to obtain high yields of γ-PGA with different properties. Many medical applications (especially drug delivery) have exploited α-PGA. As γ-PGA is essentially different from α-PGA (i.e. it does not involve a chemical modification step and is not susceptible to proteases), it could be better utilized for such medical applications. Optimization of γ-PGA with respect to cost of production, molecular mass and conformational/enantiomeric properties is a major step in making its application practical. Analyses of γ-PGA production and knowledge of the enzymes and genes involved in γ-PGA production will not only help increase productivity whilst reducing the cost of production, but also help to understand the mechanism by which γ-PGA is effective in numerous applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wu, Q., Xu, H., Ying, H., & Ouyang, P. (2010) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bej.2010.02.012 · Cited by 28
Cited by
Biopolymer-based functional composites for medical applications
Park, S.-B., Lih, E., Park, K.-S., Joung, Y. K., & Han, D. K. (2017) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.12.003 · Cited by 429
Multicomponent peptide assemblies
Raymond, D. M., & Nilsson, B. L. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00115d · Cited by 346
The production and application of hydrogels for wound management: A review
Gupta, A., Kowalczuk, M., Heaselgrave, W., Britland, S. T., Martin, C., & Radecka, I. (2019) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.12.019 · Cited by 336
Self-citationMicrobial synthesis of poly-γ-glutamic acid: current progress, challenges, and future perspectives
Luo, Z., Guo, Y., Liu, J., Qiu, H., Zhao, M., Zou, W., & Li, S. (2016) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-016-0537-7 · Cited by 274
Pereira, A. E. S., Sandoval-Herrera, I. E., Zavala-Betancourt, S. A., Oliveira, H. C., Ledezma-Pérez, A. S., Romero, J., & Fraceto, L. F. (2017) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.073 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Ogunleye, A., Bhat, A., Irorere, V. U., Hill, D., Williams, C., & Radecka, I.
- Venue
- Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2015-01-01
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-17
- ISSN
- 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2080
- OpenAlex
- W2003983219
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Poly-γ-glutamic acid: production, properties and applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/mic.0.081448-0
- The paper
- Ogunleye, A., Bhat, A., Irorere, V. U., Hill, D., Williams, C., & Radecka, I. (2015). Poly-γ-glutamic acid: production, properties and applications. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.081448-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.