The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acid-shock responses in Staphylococcus aureus investigated by global gene expression analysis
Abstract
A general overview is presented of the changes in the genetic expression along a time curve through the first 20 min after acidification to pH 4.5 of exponentially growing cultures of the food pathogenic strain Staphylococcus aureus 50583. A newly developed method for statistical significance testing was used to detect significant gene expression responses. Most responses showed an increase or decrease from time zero to 10 min after acidification, and then generally a stabilization in expression level from 10 to 20 min. Increased urease activity appeared to be an important factor in the acid defence, along with proton excretion by NADH dehydrogenase and macromolecule repair mechanisms. Oxidative-stress responses, such as increased expression of thioredoxin genes and upregulation of pentose phosphate pathway genes to generate more reducing power, were also induced. A general reduction in the expression of genes encoding ribosomal proteins and genes involved in nucleotide synthesis, as well as fatty acid and lipoprotein metabolism, reflected the lowered growth rate after acidification. The pH shock did not appear to trigger major virulence responses or biofilm formation. Metal ion regulation and transport were affected by the acid shock, and production of several cofactors such as molybdopterin was increased. Many of the presented observations could be explained, while some represent still-unknown mechanisms. The patterns of regulation were confirmed by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (QRT-PCR). Together, these results showed the main responses of S. aureus and will be a good starting point for future, more specific, in-depth studies of specific gene responses that occur in conjunction with the acid-stress defence of S. aureus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Horsburgh, M. J., Clements, M. O., Crossley, H., Ingham, E., & Foster, S. J. (2001) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.69.6.3744-3754.2001 · Cited by 365
Clements, M. O., Watson, S. P., & Foster, S. J. (1999) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.181.13.3898-3903.1999 · Cited by 185
Cited by
Insights into the mode of action of chitosan as an antibacterial compound.
Raafat, D., von Bargen, K., Haas, A., & Sahl, H.-G. (2008) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00453-08 · Cited by 888
Sully, E. K., Malachowa, N., Elmore, B. O., Alexander, S. M., Femling, J. K., Gray, B. M., DeLeo, F. R., Otto, M., Cheung, A. L., Edwards, B. S., et al. (2014) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004174 · Cited by 386
The Role of Macrophages in Staphylococcus aureus Infection
Pidwill, G. R., Gibson, J. F., Cole, J., Renshaw, S. A., & Foster, S. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.620339 · Cited by 341
Charlier, C., Cretenet, M., Even, S., & Le Loir, Y. (2009) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.06.032 · Cited by 215
Hiron, A., Posteraro, B., Carrière, M., Remy, L., Delporte, C., La Sorda, M., Sanguinetti, M., Juillard, V., & Borezée-Durant, E. (2010) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07287.x · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Bore, E., Langsrud, S., Langsrud, Ø., Rode, T. M., & Holck, A.
- Venue
- Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2007-07-01
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2289-2303
- ISSN
- 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2080
- OpenAlex
- W2118772273
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acid-shock responses in Staphylococcus aureus investigated by global gene expression analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/mic.0.2007/005942-0
- The paper
- Bore, E., Langsrud, S., Langsrud, Ø., Rode, T. M., & Holck, A. (2007). Acid-shock responses in Staphylococcus aureus investigated by global gene expression analysis. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.2007/005942-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.