Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 433 of the 433 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Role of Macrophages in Staphylococcus aureus Infection

Open access
Pidwill, Grace R., Gibson, Josie F., Cole, Joby, Renshaw, Stephen A., Foster, Simon J.·2021·Frontiers in Immunology

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a member of the human commensal microflora that exists, apparently benignly, at multiple sites on the host. However, as an opportunist pathogen it can also cause a range of serious diseases. This requires an ability to circumvent the innate immune system to establish an infection. Professional phagocytes, primarily macrophages and neutrophils, are key innate immune cells which interact with S. aureus, acting as gatekeepers to contain and resolve infection. Recent studies have highlighted the important roles of macrophages during S. aureus infections, using a wide array of killing mechanisms. In defense, S. aureus has evolved multiple strategies to survive within, manipulate and escape from macrophages, allowing them to not only subvert but also exploit this key element of our immune system. Macrophage-S. aureus interactions are multifaceted and have direct roles in infection outcome. In depth understanding of these host-pathogen interactions may be useful for future therapeutic developments. This review examines macrophage interactions with S. aureus throughout all stages of infection, with special emphasis on mechanisms that determine infection outcome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fimmu.2020.620339

Cites

433 of 433 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 433 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Plaut, 2012, Dissemination bottleneck in a murine model of inhalational anthrax, Infect Immun, 80, 10.1128/IAI.00515-12 · doi:10.1128/iai.00515-12
  2. Al Alam, 2005, 037 Comparative chemokine secretory profiles in normal and CF polarized epithelial cells following S. aureus infection, Rev Mal Respir, 22, 862, 10.1016/S0761-8425(05)92449-2 · doi:10.1016/s0761-8425(05)92449-2
  3. Wilkinson, 1978, Activation of complement by cell surface components of Staphylococcus aureus, Infect Immun, 20, 10.1128/IAI.20.2.388-392.1978 · doi:10.1128/iai.20.2.388-392.1978
  4. Amdahl, 2017, Staphylococcal protein Ecb impairs complement receptor-1 mediated recognition of opsonized bacteria, PLoS One, 12, e0172675, 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0172675 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0172675
  5. Dorrington, 1976, Properties of the Fc receptor on macrophages and monocytes, Immunol Commun, 5, 10.3109/08820137609044280 · doi:10.3109/08820137609044280
  6. Christensson, 1982, Detection of staphylococcus aureus antibodies in patrients with S. aureus infections and in normal persons, using solid phase radioimmunoassay, Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Ser B Microbiol, 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1982.tb00113.x · doi:10.1111/j.1699-0463.1982.tb00113.x
  7. Hsieh, 1978, Effect of Protein A on the antistaphylococcal defense mechanisms of the murine lung, J Infect Dis, 138, 10.1093/infdis/138.6.754 · doi:10.1093/infdis/138.6.754
  8. Lee, 1984, Opsonin-independent phagocytosis of surface-adherent bacteria by human alveolar macrophages, J Leukoc Biol, 36, 689, 10.1002/jlb.36.6.689 · doi:10.1002/jlb.36.6.689
  9. Sun, 2018, Essential genes of the macrophage response to Staphylococcus aureus exposure, Cell Mol Biol Lett, 23, 25, 10.1186/s11658-018-0090-4 · doi:10.1186/s11658-018-0090-4
  10. Lukacs, 1991, Determinants of the phagosomal pH in macrophages, J Biol Chem, 266
  11. Styrt, 1988, Effects of pH on killing of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli by constituents of the neutrophil phagolysosome, J Med Microbiol, 25, 10.1099/00222615-25-2-101 · doi:10.1099/00222615-25-2-101
  12. Kavanaugh, 2020, Cathepsin G degrades Staphylococcus aureus biofilms, J Infect Dis, 6, 12, 10.1093/infdis/jiaa612 · doi:10.1093/infdis/jiaa612
  13. Wu, 2010, Type-IIA secreted phospholipase A2 is an endogenous antibiotic-like protein of the host, Biochimie, 92, 10.1016/j.biochi.2010.01.024 · doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2010.01.024
  14. Butcher, 1976, Sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus to unsaturated fatty acids, J Gen Microbiol, 94, 10.1099/00221287-94-2-290 · doi:10.1099/00221287-94-2-290
  15. García-Martínez, 2019, Extracellular vesicles released by J774A.1 macrophages reduce the bacterial load in macrophages and in an experimental mouse model of tuberculosis, Int J Nanomed, 14, 10.2147/IJN.S203507 · doi:10.2147/ijn.s203507

Cited by

See all 341

Metadata

Authors
Pidwill, G. R., Gibson, J. F., Cole, J., Renshaw, S. A., & Foster, S. J.
Venue
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2021-01-19
Volume
11
Pages
620339-620339
ISSN
1664-3224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3124933146
Cited by
341
References
433
FWCI
16.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
Medical Research Council (MR/R001111/1, MRNO2995X/1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of Macrophages in Staphylococcus aureus Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fimmu.2020.620339
The paper
Pidwill, G. R., Gibson, J. F., Cole, J., Renshaw, S. A., & Foster, S. J. (2021). The Role of Macrophages in Staphylococcus aureus Infection. Frontiers in Immunology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.620339

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.