The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic analysis of the β-lactamases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium smegmatis and susceptibility to β-lactam antibiotics
Abstract
Mycobacteria produce β-lactamases and are intrinsically resistant to β-lactam antibiotics. In addition to the β-lactamases, cell envelope permeability and variations in certain peptidoglycan biosynthetic enzymes are believed to contribute to β-lactam resistance in these organisms. To allow the study of these additional mechanisms, mutants of the major β-lactamases, BlaC and BlaS, were generated in the pathogenic Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H37Rv and the model organism Mycobacterium smegmatis strain PM274. The mutants M. tuberculosis PM638 (Δ blaC1) and M. smegmatis PM759 (Δ blaS1) showed an increase in susceptibility to β-lactam antibiotics, as determined by disc diffusion and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays. The susceptibility of the mutants, as assayed by disc diffusion tests, to penicillin-type β-lactam antibiotics was affected most, compared to the cephalosporin-type β-lactam antibiotics. The M. tuberculosis mutant had no detectable β-lactamase activity, while the M. smegmatis mutant had a residual type 1 β-lactamase activity. We identified a gene, blaE, encoding a putative cephalosporinase in M. smegmatis. A double β-lactamase mutant of M. smegmatis, PM976 (Δ blaS1 Δ blaE : : res), had no detectable β-lactamase activity, but its susceptibility to β-lactam antibiotics was not significantly different from that of the Δ blaS1 parental strain, PM759. The mutants generated in this study will help determine the contribution of other β-lactam resistance mechanisms in addition to serving as tools to study the biology of peptidoglycan biosynthesis in these organisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence
Cole, S. T., Brosch, R., Parkhill, J., Garnier, T., Churcher, C., Harris, D., Gordon, S. V., Eiglmeier, K., Gas, S., Barry, C. E., et al. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31159 · Cited by 7,847
Cited by
Phagosomal Rupture by Mycobacterium tuberculosis Results in Toxicity and Host Cell Death
Simeone, R., Bobard, A., Lippmann, J., Bitter, W., Majlessi, L., Brosch, R., & Enninga, J. (2012) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002507 · Cited by 561
Bacterial Growth and Cell Division: a Mycobacterial Perspective
Hett, E. C., & Rubin, E. J. (2008) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00028-07 · Cited by 408
Simeone, R., Sayes, F., Song, O., Gröschel, M. I., Brodin, P., Brosch, R., & Majlessi, L. (2015) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004650 · Cited by 198
Fukuda, T., Matsumura, T., Ato, M., Hamasaki, M., Nishiuchi, Y., Murakami, Y., Maeda, Y., Yoshimori, T., Matsumoto, S., Kobayashi, K., et al. (2013) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00472-12 · Cited by 136
Sullivan, J. T., Young, E. F., McCann, J. R., & Braunstein, M. (2012) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.05987-11 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Flores, A. R., Parsons, L. M., & Pavelka
- Venue
- Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 521-532
- ISSN
- 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2080
- OpenAlex
- W2153513099
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic analysis of the β-lactamases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium smegmatis and susceptibility to β-lactam antibiotics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/mic.0.27629-0
- The paper
- Flores, A. R., Parsons, L. M., & Pavelka. (2005). Genetic analysis of the β-lactamases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium smegmatis and susceptibility to β-lactam antibiotics. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.27629-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.