PreprintCited by 7Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksRNA Research and SplicingAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications

Post-transcriptional regulation across human tissues

Open access
Franks, Alexander, Airoldi, Edoardo, Slavov, Nikolai·2015·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005535 · Paper page

Abstract

Transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation shape tissue-type-specific proteomes, but their relative contributions remain contested. Estimates of the factors determining protein levels in human tissues do not distinguish between ( i ) the factors determining the variability between the abundances of different proteins, i.e., mean-level-variability and, ( ii ) the factors determining the physiological variability of the same protein across different tissue types, i.e., across-tissues variability. We sought to estimate the contribution of transcript levels to these two orthogonal sources of variability, and found that scaled mRNA levels can account for most of the mean-level-variability but not necessarily for across-tissues variability. The reliable quantification of the latter estimate is limited by substantial measurement noise. However, protein-to-mRNA ratios exhibit substantial across-tissues variability that is functionally concerted and reproducible across different datasets, suggesting extensive post-transcriptional regulation. These results caution against estimating protein fold-changes from mRNA fold-changes between different cell-types, and highlight the contribution of post-transcriptional regulation to shaping tissue-type-specific proteomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/020206

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Franks, A., Airoldi, E., & Slavov, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2015-05-31
OpenAlex
W2613755444
Cited by
7
References
6
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • TUScholarShare (Temple University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Washington Research Foundation
  • University of Washington
  • Broad Institute
  • Scheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (DP2GM123497)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Keywords
post-transcriptional regulation, transcriptome, human tissue, measurement noise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review