Cited by 49Gene expression and cancer classificationBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Correlation signature of the macroscopic states of the gene regulatory network in cancer

Open access
Slavov, Nikolai, Dawson, Kenneth A.·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Although cancer types differ substantially, many cancers share common gene expression signatures. Consistent with this observation, we find convergent and representative distributions and correlation vectors that are distinct in cancer and noncancer ensembles. These differences originate in many genes, but comparatively few genes account for the major differences. We identify genes with different combinatorial regulation in cancer and noncancer as indicated by significant differences in their correlation vectors. Among the identified genes are many established oncogenes and apoptotic genes (such as members of the Bcl-2, the MAPK, and the Ras families) and new candidate oncogenes. Our findings expand and complement the tumorigenic role of up and down regulation of these genes by emphasizing cancer-specific changes in their couplings and correlation patterns at genome-wide level that are independent from their mean levels of expression in cancer cells. Given the central role of these genes in defining the cancerous state it may be worth investigating them and the differences in their combinatorial regulation for developing wide-spectrum anticancer drugs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0810803106

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tumor samples have discrete transcriptome profile differences.

    “Thus, tumor samples have discrete transcriptome profile differences89,90”

    From Rare and common variants: twenty arguments (2012) · cites this paper as [90]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slavov, N., & Dawson, K. A.
Affiliations
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-03-17
Volume
106
Issue
11
Pages
4079-4084
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2138017291
Cited by
49
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
gene regulatory networks, cancer, gene expression signatures, combinatorial gene regulation, oncogenes, apoptosis-related genes, Bcl-2 family proteins, MAPK signaling, Ras family, gene co-expression, anticancer drug development
MeSH terms
Humans, Neoplasms, Oncogenes, Models, Statistical, Genome, Human, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Cluster Analysis, Apoptosis, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, Genomics, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review