PreprintCited by 123Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetics and Physical Performance

Heterogeneity in polygenic scores for common human traits

Open access
Ware, Erin B, Schmitz, Lauren L, Faul, Jessica, Gard, Arianna, Mitchell, Colter, Smith, Jennifer A, Zhao, Wei, Weir, David +1 more·2017·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on a wide range of important human traits have identified hundreds of variants in multi-cohort meta-analyses that have highly significant associations (p<5 x10-8) that replicate across studies. However, the identified genetic variants, or single nucleotide

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/106062

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PRS are many-fold more accurate in European ancestry individuals than in others, and this disparity is the major ethical and scientific challenge surrounding clinical implementation.

    “However, the major ethical and scientific challenge surrounding clinical implementation is that they are many-fold more accurate in European ancestry individuals than others.”

    From Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities (2019) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Discussion reports that European-ancestry-weighted scores explained approximately twice as much trait variation in the HRS non-Hispanic White sample as in the non-Hispanic Black sample. That supports a performance disparity, but not a general claim about all other ancestries or that the scores are “many-fold more accurate.” The paper does not identify this disparity as the major ethical and scientific challenge to clinical implementation. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The scientific basis of the imbalance in PRS accuracy has been demonstrated theoretically, in simulations, and empirically across many traits and diseases.

    “The scientific basis of this imbalance has been demonstrated theoretically, in simulations, and empirically across many traits and diseases11–22.”

    From Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities (2019) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Cross-race/ethnicity comparison and Discussion (pages not provided) report empirical differences in polygenic-score performance between non-Hispanic White and Black participants across the traits studied. The paper does not establish this imbalance theoretically or through simulations, and its empirical analysis is limited to four traits rather than many traits and diseases. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Belsky DW & Israel S (2014) Integrating genetics and social science: genetic risk scores. Biodemography Soc Biol 60(2):137-155.
  2. Purcell S, et al. (2007) PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 81(3):559-575.
  3. Euesden J, Lewis CM, & O'Reilly PF (2015) PRSice: Polygenic Risk Score software. Bioinformatics 31(9):1466-1468.
  4. Vilhjalmsson BJ, et al. (2015) Modeling Linkage Disequilibrium Increases Accuracy of Polygenic Risk Scores. Am J Hum Genet 97(4):576-592.
  5. Sonnega A, et al. (2014) Cohort Profile: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). Int J Epidemiol 43(2):576-585.
  6. Locke AE, et al. (2015) Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology. Nature 518(7538):197-206.
  7. Lango Allen H, et al. (2010) Hundreds of variants clustered in genomic loci and biological pathways affect human height. Nature 467(7317):832-838.
  8. Rietveld CA, et al. (2013) GWAS of 126,559 individuals identifies genetic variants associated with educational attainment. Science 340(6139):1467-1471.
  9. Okbay A, et al. (2016) Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment. Nature 533(7604):539-542.
  10. Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric GC, et al. (2013) A mega-analysis of genome-wide association studies for major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatry 18(4):497-511.
  11. Wray NR, Goddard ME, & Visscher PM (2007) Prediction of individual genetic risk to disease from genome-wide association studies. Genome Res 17(10):1520-1528.
  12. Wu J, Pfeiffer RM, & Gail MH (2013) Strategies for developing prediction models from genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol 37(8):768-777.
  13. Chatterjee N, et al. (2013) Projecting the performance of risk prediction based on polygenic analyses of genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 45(4):400-405, 405e401-403.
  14. Shi J, et al. (2016) Winner's Curse Correction and Variable Thresholding Improve Performance of Polygenic Risk Modeling Based on Genome-Wide Association Study Summary-Level Data. PLoS Genet 12(12):e1006493.
  15. Dudbridge F (2016) Polygenic Epidemiology. Genet Epidemiol 40(4):268-272.
  16. Goldstein BA, Yang L, Salfati E, & Assimes TL (2015) Contemporary Considerations for Constructing a Genetic Risk Score: An Empirical Approach. Genet Epidemiol 39(6):439-445.
  17. Wray NR, et al. (2014) Research review: Polygenic methods and their application to psychiatric traits. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 55(10):1068-1087.
  18. Smith DJ, et al. (2016) Genome-wide analysis of over 106 000 individuals identifies 9 neuroticism- associated loci. Mol Psychiatry 21(6):749-757.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ware, E. B., Schmitz, L. L., Faul, J., Gard, A., Mitchell, C., Smith, J. A., Zhao, W., Weir, D., & Kardia, S. L.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Ware, Erin B
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2017-02-05
OpenAlex
W2586927005
Cited by
123
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 13
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Physical Performance
Keywords
polygenic risk score, heterogeneity, genetic variants, genome-wide association study, replication, polygenic risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review