PreprintCited by 3Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene expression and cancer classification

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PEPA test: fast and powerful differential analysis from relative quantitative proteomics data using shared peptides

Open access
Jacob, Laurent, Combes, Florence, Burger, Thomas·2017·Biostatistics

Preprint — published as 10.1093/biostatistics/kxy021 · Paper page

Abstract

We propose a new hypothesis test for the differential abundance of proteins in mass-spectrometry based relative quantification. An important feature of this type of high-throughput analyses is that it involves an enzymatic digestion of the sample proteins into peptides prior to identification and quantification. Due to numerous homology sequences, different proteins can lead to peptides with identical amino acid chains, so that their parent protein is ambiguous. These so-called shared peptides make the protein-level statistical analysis a challenge, so that they are often not accounted for. In this article, we use a linear model describing peptide-protein relationships to build a likelihood ratio test of differential abundance for proteins. We show that the likelihood ratio statistic can be computed in linear time with the number of peptides. We also provide the asymptotic null distribution of a regularized version of our statistic. Experiments on both real and simulated datasets show that our procedures outperforms state-of-the-art methods. The procedures are available via the pepa.test function of the DAPAR Bioconductor R package.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/158212

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1002/pmic.201100660 · DOI
  2. 10.1142/S0219720008003321 · DOI
  3. Choi, Meena , Chang, Ching-Yun , Clough, Timothy , Broudy, Daniel , Killeen, Trevor , Maclean, Brendan And Vitek, Olga . (2014). Msstats: an r package for statistical analysis of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments. Bioinformatics, btu305. · DOI
  4. 10.1021/pr900610q · DOI
  5. 10.1186/1471-2105-13-S10-S6 · DOI
  6. Commentary. (2014). Ten years of methods. Nature Methods 11. · DOI
  7. 10.1089/cmb.2009.0267 · DOI
  8. 2014, Statistical approach to protein quantification, Molecular & cellular proteomics, 13, 666, 10.1074/mcp.M112.025445 · DOI
  9. 2016, Calibration plot for proteomics: A graphical tool to visually check the assumptions underlying fdr control in quantitative experiments, Proteomics, 16, 29, 10.1002/pmic.201500189 · DOI
  10. Gianetto, Quentin Giai , Couté, Yohann , Bruley, Christophe And Burger, Thomas . (2016). Uses and misuses of the fudge factor in quantitative discovery proteomics. Proteomics. · DOI
  11. 10.1021/pr501223t · DOI
  12. 2016, Peptide-level robust ridge regression improves estimation, sensitivity, and specificity in data-dependent quantitative label-free shotgun proteomics, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 15, 657, 10.1074/mcp.M115.055897 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Harchaoui, Zaid , Bach, Francis And Moulines, Eric . (2008, April). Testing for Homogeneity with Kernel Fisher Discriminant Analysis. working paper or preprint.
  14. Hodille, Elisabeth , Alekseeva, Ludmila , Berkova, Nadia , Serrier, Asma , Badiou, Cedric , Gilquin, Benoit , Brun, Virginie , Vande-Nesch, Francois , Terman, David S And Lina, Gerard . (2016). Staphylococcal enterotoxin o exhibits cell cycle modulating activity. Frontiers in microbiology 7. · DOI
  15. 2007, The effects of shared peptides on protein quantitation in label-free proteomics by lc/ms/ms, Journal of proteome research, 7, 164
  16. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.025 · DOI
  17. 10.1126/science.1239181 · DOI
  18. 2010, Peek a peak: a glance at statistics for quantitative label-free proteomics, Expert review of proteomics, 7, 249, 10.1586/epr.09.107 · DOI
  19. 2016, Benchmarking quantitative label-free lc-ms data processing workflows using a complex spiked proteomic standard dataset, Journal of Proteomics, 132, 51, 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.11.011 · DOI
  20. 10.1021/ac048455k · DOI
  21. 2006, Absolute quantification of proteins by lcmse a virtue of parallel ms acquisition, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 5, 144, 10.1074/mcp.M500230-MCP200 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Smyth, Gordon K .(2005). Limma: linear models for microarray data. In: Bioinformatics and computational biology solutions using R and Bioconductor. Springer, pp. 397-420. · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1073/pnas.091062498 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Van Der Vaart, A. W. (2007). Asymptotic Statistics. Cambridge.
  25. Wieczorek, Samuel , Combes, Florence , Lazar, Cosmin , Gianetto, Quentin Giai , Gatto, Laurent , Dorffer, Alexia , Hesse, Annemarie , Coute, Yohann , Ferro, Myriam , Bruley, Christophe and others. (2016). Dapar & prostar: software to perform statistical analyses in quantitative discovery proteomics. Bioinformatics, btw580. · DOI
  26. 10.1214/aoms/1177732360 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/cr3003533 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Jacob, L., Combes, F., & Burger, T.
Affiliations
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Jacob, Laurent
Venue
Biostatistics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2017-06-30
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
632-647
ISSN
1465-4644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2953168832
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biostatistics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-INBS-08, 10-INBS-08, ANR-14-CE23-0003, ANR-10, ANR-17-CE23-0011, CE23-0003)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
differential protein abundance, likelihood ratio test, linear models, asymptotic null distribution, hypothesis testing
MeSH terms
Humans, Peptides, Models, Statistical, Proteomics, Biostatistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review