Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
PreprintCited by 28Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and DynamicsAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transient states and barriers from molecular simulations and milestoning theory: kinetics in ligand-protein recognition and compound design

Open access
Tang, Zhiye, Chen, Si-Han, Chang, Chia-en A.·2017·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Preprint — published as 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01153 · Paper page

Abstract

This study applies a novel computational strategy to investigate molecular recognition and binding kinetics using five pyrazolourea ligands dissociating from cyclin-dependent kinase 8 with cyclin C (CDK8/CycC) as an example. The computed free energy barriers guide designing compounds using the transient conformations unavailable in experiments. The intermediates and their free energy profile during ligand association and discussion processes control ligand-protein binding kinetics and bring a more complete picture of ligand-protein binding. We used metadynamics and a pathway search method to sample pathways and applied combined reduced dimensionality, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and milestoning theory to construct the free energy profile and estimate the residence time. The binding free energy and the trend of binding kinetics agreed with experiments. We explain the why of the barriers and the kinetics and use the information to assist ligand design. Guided by a barrier of a ligand passing an αC helix and activation loop, we introduced one hydroxyl group to parent compounds to design our ligands with increased residence time and validated our prediction by experiments. This work provides a novel and robust approach to investigate dissociation kinetics of large and flexible systems for understanding unbinding mechanisms and designing new small molecule drugs with desired binding kinetics. Significance Statement: The transient conformations during ligand binding/unbinding control non-covalent binding kinetics. However, the transient structures and their free energy landscape of flexible ligand-protein systems are unavailable in experiments and challenging to model. Due to lack of understanding in binding kinetics, even scientists know that kinetic properties can be important in drug development, calculations using the intermediate states to design ligands with preferred binding kinetics are absent. We overcome these challenges and compute ligand-protein unbinding free energy profile using a novel method with molecular dynamics simulations, reduced dimensionality, and milestoning theory to deepen our understanding in molecular recognition. We also designed compounds based on the computed free energy barriers and experimentally validated that our designed compound can increase residence time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/169607

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.02.002 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/nrd.2015.18 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1002/minf.201501018 · DOI
  4. 10.1039/c6md00581k · DOI
  5. 2018, Drug-Target Kinetics in Drug Discovery, Acs Chemical Neuroscience, 9, 29, 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00185 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.10.001 · DOI
  7. 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00640 · DOI
  8. Tiwary, P. ; Mondal, J. ; Berne, B. J. , How and when does an anticancer drug leave its binding site? Science Advances 2017, 3 (5). · DOI
  9. 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00216 · DOI
  10. 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b01112 · DOI
  11. 10.1039/c7sc01627a · DOI
  12. 2018, Quantifying the Kinetic Residence Time as a Potential Complement to Affinity for the Aptamer Selection, Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 122, 8380, 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b06418 · DOI
  13. 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00172 · DOI
  14. 10.2741/4527 · DOI
  15. Ganesan, A. ; Coote, M. L. ; Barakat, K. , Molecular ‘time-machines’ to unravel key biological events for drug design. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Computational Molecular Science 2017, 7 (4). · DOI
  16. 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00277 · DOI
  17. 10.1073/pnas.1424461112 · DOI
  18. Mollica, L. ; Decherchi, S. ; Zia, S. R. ; Gaspari, R. ; Cavalli, A. ; Rocchia, W. , Kinetics of protein-ligand unbinding via smoothed potential molecular dynamics simulations. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5. · DOI
  19. 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00173 · DOI
  20. 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00504 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/jacs.6b12950 · DOI
  22. 2018, Ligand Binding Pathways and Conformational Transitions of the HIV Protease, Biochemistry, 57, 1533, 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01248 · DOI
  23. 10.1063/1.1755656 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 2018, Estimation of Drug-Target Residence Times by tau-Random Acceleration Molecular Dynamics Simulations, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 14, 3859, 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00230 · DOI
  25. 2018, Steered molecular dynamics simulations for uncovering the molecular mechanisms of drug dissociation and for drug screening: A test on the focal adhesion kinase, Journal of Computational Chemistry, 39, 1307, 10.1002/jcc.25201 · DOI
  26. 2019, Predicting Residence Time and Drug Unbinding Pathway through Scaled Molecular Dynamics, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 59, 535, 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00614 · DOI
  27. 2017, Weighted Ensemble Simulation: Review of Methodology, Applications, and Software, Annual Review of Biophysics, 46, 43
  28. 2011, Umbrella sampling, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Computational Molecular Science, 1, 932, 10.1002/wcms.66 · DOI
  29. 2016, Sampling Free Energy Surfaces as Slices by Combining Umbrella Sampling and Metadynamics, Journal of Computational Chemistry, 37, 1413, 10.1002/jcc.24349 · DOI
  30. Bello-Rivas, J. M. ; Elber, R. , Exact milestoning. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 142 (9). · DOI
  31. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b09388 · DOI
  32. Elber, R. , A new paradigm for atomically detailed simulations of kinetics in biophysical systems. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics 2017, 50. · DOI
  33. Grazioli, G. ; Andricioaei, I. , Advances in milestoning. I. Enhanced sampling via wind-assisted reweighted milestoning (WARM). Journal of Chemical Physics 2018, 149 (8). · DOI
  34. 2018, Markov State Models: From an Art to a Science, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 140, 2386, 10.1021/jacs.7b12191 · DOI
  35. Philip, S. ; Kumarasiri, M. ; Teo, T. ; Yu, M. ; Wang, S. , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 8: A New Hope in Targeted Cancer Therapy? Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 5073–5092. · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.biochi.2013.10.004 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1101/gad.1767009 · DOI
  38. 2011, Dysregulation of CDK8 and Cyclin C in tumorigenesis, Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 38, 439, 10.1016/j.jgg.2011.09.002 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.07.020 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.02.020 · DOI
  41. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01685 · DOI
  42. 10.1073/pnas.1305378110 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2014.03.003 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/s10822-018-0120-3 · DOI
  45. 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00679 · DOI
  46. 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b01204 · DOI
  47. 10.1021/ci034148o · DOI
  48. 10.1093/nar/gku340 · DOI
  49. 10.1021/jm049575n · DOI
  50. 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73940-4 · DOI
  51. 10.1002/jcc.20035 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1063/1.1738640 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Tang, Z., Chen, S.-H., & Chang, C.-E. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Chang, Chia-en A.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2017-07-28
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
1882-1895
ISSN
1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3004735288
Cited by
28
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (TG-CHE130009, 1350401, CHE-130009)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM109045, GM109045)
  • Division of Chemistry
  • Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences (MCB-1350401)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
Keywords
ligand dissociation, transient states, free energy profiles, principal component analysis, residence time, binding free energy, ligand design, flexible proteins, metadynamics
MeSH terms
Humans, Kinetics, Ligands, Protein Binding, Proteins, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transient states and barriers from molecular simulations and milestoning theory: kinetics in ligand-protein recognition and compound design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/169607
The paper
Tang, Z., Chen, S.-H., & Chang, C.-E. A. (2017). Transient states and barriers from molecular simulations and milestoning theory: kinetics in ligand-protein recognition and compound design. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1101/169607

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.