The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conformational distributions of isolated myosin motor domains encode their mechanochemical properties
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.7554/elife.55132 · Paper page
Abstract
Myosin motor domains perform an extraordinary diversity of biological functions despite sharing a common mechanochemical cycle. Motors are adapted to their function, in part, by tuning the thermodynamics and kinetics of steps in this cycle. However, it remains unclear how sequence encodes these differences, since biochemically distinct motors often have nearly indistinguishable crystal structures. We hypothesized that sequences produce distinct biochemical phenotypes by modulating the relative probabilities of an ensemble of conformations primed for different functional roles. To test this hypothesis, we modeled the distribution of conformations for twelve myosin motor domains by building Markov state models (MSMs) from an unprecedented two milliseconds of all-atom, explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations. Comparing motors reveals shifts in the balance between nucleotide-favorable and nucleotide-unfavorable P-loop conformations that predict experimentally-measured duty ratios and ADP release rates better than sequence or individual structures. This result demonstrates the power of an ensemble perspective for interrogating sequence-function relationships. Subject Areas: Biochemistry and Chemical Biology, Structural Biology and Molecular Physics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics
Chodera, J. D., & Noé, F. (2014) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2014.04.002 · Cited by 776
Bowman, G. R., & Geissler, P. L. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1209309109 · Cited by 279
Self-citationKinetic Mechanism and Regulation of Myosin VI
De La Cruz, E. M., Ostap, E. M., & Sweeney, H. L. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m104136200 · Cited by 234
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 69
- 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nsmb908 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1711512115 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M113.488130 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.09.015 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1417811112 · DOI
- Bowman GR , Pande VS , Noé F. 2013. An Introduction to Markov State Models and Their Application to Long Timescale Molecular Simulation. Springer Science & Business Media. · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.32742 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0064797 · DOI
- 2017, Jug: Software for Parallel Reproducible Computation in Python, J Open Res Softw, 5, 022109
- 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600458 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)04206-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ceb.2003.11.011 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.96.24.13726 · DOI
- 2012, Identification of functional differences between recombinant human α and β cardiac myosin motors, Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS, 69, 2261, 10.1007/s00018-012-0927-3 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.10349 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkh180 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkh340 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0408784102 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M000342200 · DOI
- Green DA . 2011. A colour scheme for the display of astronomical intensity images. arXiv.org.
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.05.021 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1506633112 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi9712596 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.24149 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ncomms12965 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005826 · DOI
- 10.1080/19490992.2015.1054092 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06522 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M504779200 · DOI
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M611802200 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.RA119.009825 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.134.4.895 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tibs.2018.11.007 · DOI
- 2005, Myosins: tails (and heads) of functional diversity, Physiol Bethesda Md, 20, 239
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.05.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.015 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1718316115 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M112.424671 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2004.1560 · DOI
- Oliphant TE . 2007. Python for scientific computing. Comput Sci Eng 9. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.272.44.27612 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.04.018 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-017-00176-5 · DOI
- Porter JR , Moeder KE , Sibbald CA , Zimmerman MI , Hart KM , Greenberg MJ , Bowman GR . 2019a. Cooperative Changes in Solvent Exposure Identify Cryptic Pockets, Switches, and Allosteric Coupling. Biophys J. · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, Enspara: Modeling molecular ensembles with scalable data structures and parallel computing, J Chem Phys, 150, 044108, 10.1063/1.5063794 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1905028116 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.8316857 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-019-11120-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/0968-0004(90)90281-F · DOI
- 10.1126/science.290.5498.1903 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1321022111 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b01181 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.009 · DOI
- 2018, Simulation of spontaneous G protein activation reveals a new intermediate driving GDP unbinding, eLife, 7, 19
- 10.1074/jbc.273.11.6262 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M709150200 · DOI
- Tange O. 2011. GNU Parallel - The Command-Line Power Tool. Login USENIX Mag 42–47.
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1998)12:6<385::AID-HUMU4>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.RA118.001938 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M511592200 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky427 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms8974 · DOI
- 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00465 · DOI
- Zimmerman MI , Porter JR , Sun X , Silva RR , Bowman GR . 2018. Choice of adaptive sampling strategy impacts state discovery, transition probabilities, and the apparent mechanism of conformational changes. J Chem Theory Comput 14:acs.jctc.8b00500–5475. · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Porter, J. R., Meller, A., Zimmerman, M. I., Greenberg, M. J., & Bowman, G. R.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bowman, Gregory R.
- Venue
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2019-12-17
- OpenAlex
- W2996613686
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1552471, CAREER)
- Burroughs Wellcome Fund (MCB-1552471)
- National Institutes of Health (T32GM02700, MCB-1552471, R01GM12400701)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (F30HL146052, R01HL141086)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Keywords
- myosin motor domain, conformational ensembles, Markov state models, mechanochemical cycle, nucleotide binding, duty cycle, sequence-function relationships, molecular dynamics simulation, ATPase kinetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review