PreprintCited by 0Protein Structure and DynamicsCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conformational distributions of isolated myosin motor domains encode their mechanochemical properties

Open access
Porter, Justin R., Meller, Artur, Zimmerman, Maxwell I., Greenberg, Michael J., Bowman, Gregory R.·2019·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.7554/elife.55132 · Paper page

Abstract

Myosin motor domains perform an extraordinary diversity of biological functions despite sharing a common mechanochemical cycle. Motors are adapted to their function, in part, by tuning the thermodynamics and kinetics of steps in this cycle. However, it remains unclear how sequence encodes these differences, since biochemically distinct motors often have nearly indistinguishable crystal structures. We hypothesized that sequences produce distinct biochemical phenotypes by modulating the relative probabilities of an ensemble of conformations primed for different functional roles. To test this hypothesis, we modeled the distribution of conformations for twelve myosin motor domains by building Markov state models (MSMs) from an unprecedented two milliseconds of all-atom, explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations. Comparing motors reveals shifts in the balance between nucleotide-favorable and nucleotide-unfavorable P-loop conformations that predict experimentally-measured duty ratios and ADP release rates better than sequence or individual structures. This result demonstrates the power of an ensemble perspective for interrogating sequence-function relationships. Subject Areas: Biochemistry and Chemical Biology, Structural Biology and Molecular Physics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2019.12.16.878264

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nsmb908 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E · DOI
  4. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1073/pnas.1711512115 · DOI
  6. 10.1074/jbc.M113.488130 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.09.015 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.1417811112 · DOI
  9. Bowman GR , Pande VS , Noé F. 2013. An Introduction to Markov State Models and Their Application to Long Timescale Molecular Simulation. Springer Science & Business Media. · DOI
  10. 10.7554/eLife.32742 · DOI
  11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0064797 · DOI
  12. 2017, Jug: Software for Parallel Reproducible Computation in Python, J Open Res Softw, 5, 022109
  13. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600458 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)04206-7 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.ceb.2003.11.011 · DOI
  16. 10.1073/pnas.96.24.13726 · DOI
  17. 2012, Identification of functional differences between recombinant human α and β cardiac myosin motors, Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS, 69, 2261, 10.1007/s00018-012-0927-3 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/jcc.10349 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/nar/gkh180 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/nar/gkh340 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1073/pnas.0408784102 · DOI
  22. 10.1074/jbc.M000342200 · DOI
  23. Green DA . 2011. A colour scheme for the display of astronomical intensity images. arXiv.org.
  24. 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.05.021 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.1506633112 · DOI
  26. 10.1021/bi9712596 · DOI
  27. 10.7554/eLife.24149 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1038/ncomms12965 · DOI
  29. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005826 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/19490992.2015.1054092 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/nature06522 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1074/jbc.M504779200 · DOI
  33. 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1074/jbc.M611802200 · DOI
  35. 10.1074/jbc.RA119.009825 · DOI
  36. 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
  37. 10.1083/jcb.134.4.895 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.tibs.2018.11.007 · DOI
  39. 2005, Myosins: tails (and heads) of functional diversity, Physiol Bethesda Md, 20, 239
  40. 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.05.014 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.015 · DOI
  42. 10.1073/pnas.1718316115 · DOI
  43. 10.1074/jbc.M112.424671 · DOI
  44. 10.1098/rstb.2004.1560 · DOI
  45. Oliphant TE . 2007. Python for scientific computing. Comput Sci Eng 9. · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1074/jbc.272.44.27612 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.04.018 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/s41467-017-00176-5 · DOI
  49. Porter JR , Moeder KE , Sibbald CA , Zimmerman MI , Hart KM , Greenberg MJ , Bowman GR . 2019a. Cooperative Changes in Solvent Exposure Identify Cryptic Pockets, Switches, and Allosteric Coupling. Biophys J. · DOI · Paper page
  50. 2019, Enspara: Modeling molecular ensembles with scalable data structures and parallel computing, J Chem Phys, 150, 044108, 10.1063/1.5063794 · DOI
  51. 10.1073/pnas.1905028116 · DOI
  52. 10.1126/science.8316857 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/s41467-019-11120-0 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/0968-0004(90)90281-F · DOI
  55. 10.1126/science.290.5498.1903 · DOI
  56. 10.1073/pnas.1321022111 · DOI
  57. 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b01181 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.009 · DOI
  59. 2018, Simulation of spontaneous G protein activation reveals a new intermediate driving GDP unbinding, eLife, 7, 19
  60. 10.1074/jbc.273.11.6262 · DOI
  61. 10.1074/jbc.M709150200 · DOI
  62. Tange O. 2011. GNU Parallel - The Command-Line Power Tool. Login USENIX Mag 42–47.
  63. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1998)12:6<385::AID-HUMU4>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
  64. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.001938 · DOI
  65. 10.1074/jbc.M511592200 · DOI
  66. 10.1093/nar/gky427 · DOI
  67. 10.1038/ncomms8974 · DOI
  68. 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00465 · DOI
  69. Zimmerman MI , Porter JR , Sun X , Silva RR , Bowman GR . 2018. Choice of adaptive sampling strategy impacts state discovery, transition probabilities, and the apparent mechanism of conformational changes. J Chem Theory Comput 14:acs.jctc.8b00500–5475. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Porter, J. R., Meller, A., Zimmerman, M. I., Greenberg, M. J., & Bowman, G. R.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Bowman, Gregory R.
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2019-12-17
OpenAlex
W2996613686
Cited by
0
References
3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1552471, CAREER)
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund (MCB-1552471)
  • National Institutes of Health (T32GM02700, MCB-1552471, R01GM12400701)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (F30HL146052, R01HL141086)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
Keywords
myosin motor domain, conformational ensembles, Markov state models, mechanochemical cycle, nucleotide binding, duty cycle, sequence-function relationships, molecular dynamics simulation, ATPase kinetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review