The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Motor cortex beta oscillations reflect motor skill learning ability after stroke
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa161
Abstract
Recovery of skilled movement after stroke is assumed to depend on motor learning. However, the capacity for motor learning and factors that influence motor learning after stroke have received little attention. In this study we firstly compared motor skill acquisition and retention between well-recovered stroke patients and age- and performance-matched healthy controls. We then tested whether beta oscillations (15–30Hz) from sensorimotor cortices contribute to predicting training-related motor performance. Eighteen well-recovered chronic stroke survivors (mean age 64±8 years, range 50–74 years) and twenty age- and sex-matched healthy controls were trained on a continuous tracking task and subsequently retested after initial training (45–60 min and 24 hours later). Scalp EEG was recorded during the performance of a simple motor task before each training and retest session. Stroke patients demonstrated capacity for motor skill learning, but it was diminished compared to age- and performance-matched healthy controls. Further, although the properties of beta oscillations prior to training were comparable between stroke patients and healthy controls, stroke patients did show less change in beta measures with motor learning. Lastly, although beta oscillations did not help to predict motor performance immediately after training, contralateral (ipsilesional) sensorimotor cortex post-movement beta rebound (PMBR) measured after training helped predict future motor performance, 24 hours after training. This finding suggests that neurophysiological measures such as beta oscillations can help predict response to motor training in chronic stroke patients and may offer novel targets for therapeutic interventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 89 · Cited by 67
Research works printed but not linked: 73
- 10.1037/h0044798 · DOI
- 2014, Time rather than sleep appears to enhance off-line learning and transfer of learning of an implicit continuous task, Nat Sci Sleep, 6, 27
- 10.1214/09-SS054 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1545968314543652 · DOI
- 2007, Multivariate time-frequency analysis of electromagnetic brain activity during bimanual motor learning, Neuroimage, 36, 370, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.012 · DOI
- 10.1177/0888439004269072 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-3940(00)01734-1 · DOI
- 2006, Explicit Information Interferes with Implicit Motor Learning of Both Continuous and Discrete Movement Tasks After Stroke, J Neurol Phys Ther, 30, 10
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3295-10.2010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4706-12.2013 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneurol.2011.1175 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn.2799 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ana.410290112 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.21393 · DOI · Paper page
- Doyon J , Ungerleider L. Functional anatomy of motor skill learning. Neuropsychology of Memory, Guilford Press, New York; 2002
- 10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.015 · DOI · Paper page
- 2016, Movement-related beta oscillations show high intra-individual reliability, Neuroimage, 147, 175
- Espenhahn S , van Wijk Bcm , Rossiter HE , de Berker AO , Redman ND , Rondina J , et al Cortical beta oscillations are associated with motor performance following visuomotor learning [Internet]. Neuroimage 2019 Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811919302861 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.410440217 · DOI
- 10.1002/hbm.20889 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.025 · DOI
- 10.1177/1545968316675432 · DOI
- Hotermans C , Peigneux P , Noordhout AM De , Moonen G , Maquet P. Early boost and slow consolidation in motor skill learning. Learn Mem 2006: 580–583. · DOI · Paper page
- 2008, Neural changes induced by learning a challenging perceptual-motor task, Neuroimage, 41, 1395, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.023 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01450.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.008 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.222536799 · DOI
- 2014, Linear combination methods to improve diagnostic/prognostic accuracy on future observations, Stat Methods Med Res, 25, 1359
- 10.1038/377155a0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1545968313520411 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.wco.0000200544.29915.cc · DOI
- 10.1177/1545968312440745 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.05.017 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.STR.31.3.656 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrn2735 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrn2735 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.054 · DOI
- Oldfield RC The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971: 97–113. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2288403 · DOI
- 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90103-1 · DOI
- 10.1191/0269215506cr916oa · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.06.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00197-9 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12984-016-0134-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.834 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/jn.00164.2007 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.290.5491.533 · DOI
- 10.1038/678 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1851-05.2005 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2663-07.2007 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00345.2014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.012 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.393 · DOI
- 2015, Cortical beta oscillations and motor thresholds differ across the spectrum of post-stroke motor impairment, a preliminary MEG and TMS study, Brain Res, 1629, 26, 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.09.037 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.12.040 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhi116 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70247-7 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhm218 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1638-09.2009 · DOI
- Thibaut A , Simis M , Battistella LR , Fanciullacci C , Bertolucci F , Huerta-Gutierrez R , et al Using brain oscillations and corticospinal excitability to understand and predict post-stroke motor function. Front Neurol 2017; 8 · DOI
- 10.1177/1545968308315599 · DOI
- 10.1186/1744-9081-5-36 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0140525X05000026 · DOI
- 2017, Restoring brain function after stroke — bridging the gap between animals and humans, Nat Publ Gr, 13, 244
- 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319954 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/awg245 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2282-13.2014 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.410330208 · DOI
- 1999, Motor Learning after Unilateral Brain Damage, Neuropsychologia, 39, 975
- 1997, Variability of practice and implicit motor learning, J Exp Psychol, 23, 987
- 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.676940 · DOI
- 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000025 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5016-03.2004 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Espenhahn, S., Rossiter, H. E., van Wijk, B. C., Redman, N., Rondina, J. M., Diedrichsen, J., & Ward, N. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Cardiff University (GB)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Espenhahn, Svenja
- Venue
- Brain Communications
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2020-01-21
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- fcaa161-fcaa161
- ISSN
- 2632-1297 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7660041
- OpenAlex
- W3092381209
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Brain Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (104943/Z/14/Z, 104943)
- European Commission (795866, HORIZON2020)
- Cardiff University
- Medical Research Council (MR/K501268/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Keywords
- stroke, motor skill learning, beta oscillations, sensorimotor cortex, motor recovery, chronic stroke, motor training, motor performance prediction, neurophysiological markers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review