PreprintCited by 67Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryMotor Control and AdaptationTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Motor cortex beta oscillations reflect motor skill learning ability after stroke

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa161

Abstract

Recovery of skilled movement after stroke is assumed to depend on motor learning. However, the capacity for motor learning and factors that influence motor learning after stroke have received little attention. In this study we firstly compared motor skill acquisition and retention between well-recovered stroke patients and age- and performance-matched healthy controls. We then tested whether beta oscillations (15–30Hz) from sensorimotor cortices contribute to predicting training-related motor performance. Eighteen well-recovered chronic stroke survivors (mean age 64±8 years, range 50–74 years) and twenty age- and sex-matched healthy controls were trained on a continuous tracking task and subsequently retested after initial training (45–60 min and 24 hours later). Scalp EEG was recorded during the performance of a simple motor task before each training and retest session. Stroke patients demonstrated capacity for motor skill learning, but it was diminished compared to age- and performance-matched healthy controls. Further, although the properties of beta oscillations prior to training were comparable between stroke patients and healthy controls, stroke patients did show less change in beta measures with motor learning. Lastly, although beta oscillations did not help to predict motor performance immediately after training, contralateral (ipsilesional) sensorimotor cortex post-movement beta rebound (PMBR) measured after training helped predict future motor performance, 24 hours after training. This finding suggests that neurophysiological measures such as beta oscillations can help predict response to motor training in chronic stroke patients and may offer novel targets for therapeutic interventions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.01.15.20017665

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 89 · Cited by 67

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. 10.1037/h0044798 · DOI
  2. 2014, Time rather than sleep appears to enhance off-line learning and transfer of learning of an implicit continuous task, Nat Sci Sleep, 6, 27
  3. 10.1214/09-SS054 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1177/1545968314543652 · DOI
  5. 2007, Multivariate time-frequency analysis of electromagnetic brain activity during bimanual motor learning, Neuroimage, 36, 370, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.012 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/0888439004269072 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0304-3940(00)01734-1 · DOI
  8. 2006, Explicit Information Interferes with Implicit Motor Learning of Both Continuous and Discrete Movement Tasks After Stroke, J Neurol Phys Ther, 30, 10
  9. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3295-10.2010 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4706-12.2013 · DOI
  11. 10.1001/archneurol.2011.1175 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nn.2799 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1002/ana.410290112 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/ana.21393 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Doyon J , Ungerleider L. Functional anatomy of motor skill learning. Neuropsychology of Memory, Guilford Press, New York; 2002
  16. 10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.015 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 2016, Movement-related beta oscillations show high intra-individual reliability, Neuroimage, 147, 175
  18. Espenhahn S , van Wijk Bcm , Rossiter HE , de Berker AO , Redman ND , Rondina J , et al Cortical beta oscillations are associated with motor performance following visuomotor learning [Internet]. Neuroimage 2019 Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811919302861 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/ana.410440217 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/hbm.20889 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.025 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/1545968316675432 · DOI
  23. Hotermans C , Peigneux P , Noordhout AM De , Moonen G , Maquet P. Early boost and slow consolidation in motor skill learning. Learn Mem 2006: 580–583. · DOI · Paper page
  24. 2008, Neural changes induced by learning a challenging perceptual-motor task, Neuroimage, 41, 1395, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.023 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01450.x · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.008 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.222536799 · DOI
  28. 2014, Linear combination methods to improve diagnostic/prognostic accuracy on future observations, Stat Methods Med Res, 25, 1359
  29. 10.1038/377155a0 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1177/1545968313520411 · DOI
  31. 10.1097/01.wco.0000200544.29915.cc · DOI
  32. 10.1177/1545968312440745 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.05.017 · DOI
  34. 10.1161/01.STR.31.3.656 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/nrn2735 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1038/nrn2735 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.054 · DOI
  38. Oldfield RC The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971: 97–113. · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.2307/2288403 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90103-1 · DOI
  41. 10.1191/0269215506cr916oa · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.06.008 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00197-9 · DOI
  44. 10.1186/s12984-016-0134-9 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.834 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1152/jn.00164.2007 · DOI
  47. 10.1126/science.290.5491.533 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/678 · DOI
  49. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1851-05.2005 · DOI
  50. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2663-07.2007 · DOI
  51. 10.1152/jn.00345.2014 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.012 · DOI
  53. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.393 · DOI
  54. 2015, Cortical beta oscillations and motor thresholds differ across the spectrum of post-stroke motor impairment, a preliminary MEG and TMS study, Brain Res, 1629, 26, 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.09.037 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.12.040 · DOI
  56. 10.1093/cercor/bhi116 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70247-7 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/cercor/bhm218 · DOI
  59. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1638-09.2009 · DOI
  60. Thibaut A , Simis M , Battistella LR , Fanciullacci C , Bertolucci F , Huerta-Gutierrez R , et al Using brain oscillations and corticospinal excitability to understand and predict post-stroke motor function. Front Neurol 2017; 8 · DOI
  61. 10.1177/1545968308315599 · DOI
  62. 10.1186/1744-9081-5-36 · DOI
  63. 10.1017/S0140525X05000026 · DOI
  64. 2017, Restoring brain function after stroke — bridging the gap between animals and humans, Nat Publ Gr, 13, 244
  65. 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319954 · DOI
  66. 10.1093/brain/awg245 · DOI
  67. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2282-13.2014 · DOI
  68. 10.1002/ana.410330208 · DOI
  69. 1999, Motor Learning after Unilateral Brain Damage, Neuropsychologia, 39, 975
  70. 1997, Variability of practice and implicit motor learning, J Exp Psychol, 23, 987
  71. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.676940 · DOI
  72. 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000025 · DOI
  73. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5016-03.2004 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Espenhahn, S., Rossiter, H. E., van Wijk, B. C., Redman, N., Rondina, J. M., Diedrichsen, J., & Ward, N. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Corresponding author
Espenhahn, Svenja
Venue
Brain Communications
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-01-21
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
fcaa161-fcaa161
ISSN
2632-1297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092381209
Cited by
67
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Brain Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (104943/Z/14/Z, 104943)
  • European Commission (795866, HORIZON2020)
  • Cardiff University
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K501268/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
stroke, motor skill learning, beta oscillations, sensorimotor cortex, motor recovery, chronic stroke, motor training, motor performance prediction, neurophysiological markers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review