PreprintCited by 53COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesBiochemical Acid Research StudiesRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

A Randomized, Single-blind, Group sequential, Active-controlled Study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of α-Lipoic acid for critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)

Open access
Zhong, Ming, Sun, Aijun, Xiao, Ting, Yao, Ge, Sang, Ling, Zheng, Xia, Zhang, Jinyan, Jin, Xuejuan +6 more·2020·Frontiers in Medicine

Preprint — published as 10.3389/fmed.2021.566609

Abstract

Object: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of α-Lipoic acid (ALA) for critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: A randomized, single-blind, group sequential, active-controlled trial was performed at JinYinTan Hospital, Wuhan, China. Between February 2020 and March 2020, 17 patients with critically ill COVID-19 were enrolled in our study. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ALA (1200 mg/d, intravenous infusion) once daily plus standard care or standard care plus equal volume saline infusion (placebo) for 7 days. All patients were monitored within the 7 days therapy and followed up to day 30 after therapy. The primary outcome of this study was the Sequential Organ Failure Estimate (SOFA) score, and the secondary outcome was the all-cause mortality within 30 days. Result: Nine patients were randomized to placebo group and 8 patients were randomized to ALA group. SOFA score was similar at baseline, increased from 4.3 to 6.0 in the placebo group and increased from 3.8 to 4.0 in the ALA group (P=0.36) after 7 days. The 30-day all-cause mortality tended to be lower in the ALA group (3/8, 37.5%) compared to that in the placebo group (7/9, 77.8%, P=0.09). Conclusion: In our study, ALA use is associated with lower SOFA score increase and lower 30-day all-cause mortality as compared with the placebo group. Although the mortality rate was two-folds higher in placebo group than in ALA group, only borderline statistical difference was evidenced due to the limited patient number. Future studies with larger patient cohort are warranted to validate the role of ALA in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.04.15.20066266

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 38 · Cited by 53

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kenneth Schulz, D.G.E., Essential Concepts in Clinical Research. 2nd Edition ed. 2019.

Authors
Zhong, M., Sun, A., Xiao, T., Yao, G., Sang, L., Zheng, X., Zhang, J., Jin, X., Xu, L., Yang, W., Wang, P., Hu, K., Zhang, D., & Ge, J.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
  • Jinyintan Hospital (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Dingyu
  • Ge, Junbo
Venue
Frontiers in Medicine
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-04-21
Volume
8
Pages
566609-566609
ISSN
2296-858X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4226042190
Cited by
53
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 10
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Biochemical Acid Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
alpha-lipoic acid, COVID-19 pandemic, critically ill patients, SOFA score, 30-day mortality, intravenous administration, antioxidant therapy, organ failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review