PreprintCited by 12Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Control of microglial dynamics by Arp2/3 and the autism and schizophrenia-associated protein Cyfip1

Open access
Drew, James, Arancibia-Carcamo, I. Lorena, Jolivet, Renaud, Lopez-Domenech, Guillermo, Attwell, David, Kittler, Josef T.·2020·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

Microglia use a highly complex and dynamic network of processes to sense and respond to their surroundings. Microglial dynamics differ throughout development and in neurological and neuropsychiatric disease, though mechanistic insight into these changes is lacking. Here we identify novel roles for regulators of the actin cytoskeleton in controlling microglial behaviour. We show that the actin branching complex Arp2/3 is critical for maintaining microglial morphology and required for surveillance but not chemotactic motility. Neuropsychiatric disease-associated Cyfip1, a core component of the WAVE regulatory complex that links Rac1 signalling to Arp2/3 activation, is highly expressed in microglia but has unknown function. We report that conditional deletion of Cyfip1 in mouse microglia reduces morphological complexity and surveillance of brain parenchyma, and increases activation state as defined by CD68 expression. Thus, altered actin-dependent microglial dynamics mediated by Cyfip1 and Arp2/3 may contribute to neuropsychiatric disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.05.31.124941

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature highlights the crucial involvement of ACTR2 and CFL1 in microglial motility.

    “the literature also highlights their crucial involvement in microglial motility [18, 20].”

    From Enhanced microglial dynamics and a paucity of tau seeding in the amyloid plaque microenvironment contribute to cognitive resilience in Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [20]

    In ‘Inhibition of Arp2/3 and Rac1 leads to defects in surveillance of brain parenchyma’ (page unavailable), Arp2/3 inhibition reduced microglial surveillance by over 50%, supporting the motility point for the Arp2/3 complex. The paper does not establish a specific role for ACTR2 separately or address CFL1/cofilin; it also reports that chemotaxis was unaffected by Arp2/3 inhibition. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 86 · Cited by 12

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bennett, M.L., Bennett, F.C., Liddelow, S.A., Ajami, B., Zamanian, J.L., Fernhoff, N.B., Mulinyawe, S.B., Bohlen, C.J., Adil, A., Tucker, A., et al. (2016). New tools for studying microglia in the mouse and human CNS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, E1738-46.
  2. Koronakis, V., Hume, P.J., Humphreys, D., Liu, T., Hørning, O., Jensen, O.N., and McGhie, E.J. (2011). WAVE regulatory complex activation by cooperating GTPases Arf and Rac1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 14449-14454.
  3. Madry, C., Arancibia-Cárcamo, I.L., Kyrargyri, V., Chan, V.T.T., Hamilton, N.B., and Attwell, D. (2018a). Effects of the ecto-ATPase apyrase on microglial ramification and surveillance reflect cell depolarization, not ATP depletion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, E1608-E1617.

Authors
Drew, J., Arancibia-Carcamo, I. L., Jolivet, R., Lopez-Domenech, G., Attwell, D., & Kittler, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute (GB)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Kittler, Josef T.
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-06-01
OpenAlex
W3031738640
Cited by
12
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (219366, 099222)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/N025644/1, G0802377)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (282430)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
microglia, Arp2/3 complex, CYFIP1, actin cytoskeleton, microglial morphology, microglial surveillance, microglial activation, CD68, WAVE regulatory complex, autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, neuropsychiatric disorders, conditional gene deletion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review