Molecular architecture of the developing mouse brain
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41586-021-03775-x · Paper page
Abstract
The mammalian brain develops through a complex interplay of spatial cues generated by diffusible morphogens, cell-cell interactions, and intrinsic genetic programs that result in the generation of likely more than a thousand distinct cell types. Therefore, a complete understanding of mammalian brain development requires systematic mapping of cell states covering the entire relevant spatiotemporal range. Here we report a comprehensive single-cell transcriptome atlas of mouse brain development spanning from gastrulation to birth. We identified almost a thousand distinct cellular states, including the initial emergence of the neuroepithelium, a rich set of region-specific secondary organizers and a complete developmental program for the functional elements of the brain and its enclosing membranes. We used the atlas to directly test the hypothesis that human glioblastoma reflects a return to a developmental cell state. In agreement, most aneuploid tumor cells matched embryonic rather than adult types, while karyotypically normal cells predominantly matched adult immune cell types.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
scRNA-seq at multiple timepoints can reconstruct developmental trajectories, revealing dynamics of transcription factors and downstream effectors regulating specialized neural populations.
“scRNA-seq at multiple timepoints can reconstruct developmental trajectories, revealing the dynamics of transcription factors and downstream effectors regulating specialized neural populations (Di Bella et al., 2020; La Manno et al., 2020; Zhong et al., 2018, 2020).”
From Single-Cell Sequencing of Brain Cell Transcriptomes and Epigenomes (2021) · cites this paper as La Manno et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Molecular Architecture of the Mouse Nervous System
Zeisel, A., Hochgerner, H., Lönnerberg, P., Johnsson, A., Memic, F., van der Zwan, J., Häring, M., Braun, E., Borm, L. E., La Manno, G., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.021 · Cited by 2,995 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Specious Art of Single-Cell Genomics
Chari, T., & Pachter, L. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.25.457696 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Single-Cell Sequencing of Brain Cell Transcriptomes and Epigenomes
Armand, E. J., Li, J., Xie, F., Luo, C., & Mukamel, E. A. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.12.010 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Resolving organoid brain region identities by mapping single-cell genomic data to reference atlases
Fleck, J. S., Sanchís-Calleja, F., He, Z., Santel, M., Boyle, M. J., Camp, J. G., & Treutlein, B. (2021) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2021.02.015 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
- Authors
- La Manno, G., Siletti, K., Furlan, A., Gyllborg, D., Vinsland, E., Langseth, C. M., Khven, I., Johnsson, A., Nilsson, M., Lönnerberg, P., & Linnarsson, S.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2020-07-03
- Volume
- 596
- Issue
- 7870
- Pages
- 92-96
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3184208286
- Cited by
- 563
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 88 · 2025: 124 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 27.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Silicon Valley Community Foundation
- Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (191929, 190495)
- Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning (SB16-0065)
- Hjärnfonden (PS2018-0012)
- Karolinska Institutet
- Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (2018.0172, 2015.0041)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Keywords
- single-cell transcriptomics, neural progenitor cells, neuroepithelium, spatial gene expression, brain membranes
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animals, Newborn, Brain, Female, Male, Mice, Neural Tube, Gastrulation, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review