PreprintCited by 15SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchAnimal Virus Infections Studiesvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Isolation of cross-reactive monoclonal antibodies against divergent human coronaviruses that delineate a conserved and vulnerable site on the spike protein

Open access
Wang, Chunyan, van Haperen, Rien, Gutiérrez-Álvarez, Javier, Li, Wentao, Okba, Nisreen M.A., Albulescu, Irina, Widjaja, Ivy, van Dieren, Brenda +10 more·2020·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

The coronavirus spike glycoprotein, located on the virion surface, is the key mediator of cell entry. As such, it is an attractive target for the development of protective antibodies and vaccines. Here we describe two human monoclonal antibodies, 1.6C7 and 28D9, that display a remarkable cross-reactivity against distinct species from three Betacoronavirus subgenera, capable of binding the spike proteins of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, MERS-CoV and the endemic human coronavirus HCoV-OC43. Both antibodies, derived from immunized transgenic mice carrying a human immunoglobulin repertoire, blocked MERS-CoV infection in cells, whereas 28D9 also showed weak cross-neutralizing potential against HCoV-OC43, SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 in a neutralization-sensitive virus pseudotyping system, but not against authentic virus. Both cross-reactive monoclonal antibodies were found to target the stem helix in the spike protein S2 fusion subunit which, in the prefusion conformation of trimeric spike, forms a surface exposed membrane-proximal helical bundle, that is antibody-accessible. We demonstrate that administration of these antibodies in mice protects from a lethal MERS-CoV challenge in both prophylactic and/or therapeutic models. Collectively, these antibodies delineate a conserved, immunogenic and vulnerabe site on the spike protein which spurs the development of broad-range diagnostic, preventive and therapeutic measures against coronaviruses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.10.20.346916

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 71 · Cited by 15

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Brouwer, P. et al. Potent neutralizing antibodies from COVID-19 patients define multiple targets of vulnerability. bioRxiv (2020).

Authors
Wang, C., van Haperen, R., Gutiérrez-Álvarez, J., Li, W., Okba, N. M. A., Albulescu, I., Widjaja, I., van Dieren, B., Fernandez-Delgado, R., Sola, I., Hurdiss, D. L., Daramola, O., Grosveld, F., van Kuppeveld, F. J. M., Haagmans, B. L., Enjuanes, L., Drabek, D., & Bosch, B.-J.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Bosch, Berend-Jan
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-10-20
OpenAlex
W3093534469
Cited by
15
References
71
Citations by year
2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • University of Bern
  • Universiteit Utrecht
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
monoclonal antibodies, coronavirus spike protein, cross-reactivity, SARS-CoV-2, MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, HCoV-OC43, Betacoronavirus, neutralizing antibodies, antibody-mediated protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review