Single Cell Sequencing Reveals Glial Specific Responses to Tissue Processing & Enzymatic Dissociation in Mice and Humans
Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41593-022-01022-8 · Paper page
Abstract
A key aspect of nearly all single cell experiments is the necessity to dissociate intact tissues into single cell suspensions for processing. While many protocols have been optimized for optimal cell yield, they have often overlooked the effects that dissociation can have on ex vivo gene expression changes during this process. Microglia, the brain’s resident macrophages, are a highly dynamic population that are extremely sensitive to their microenvironment and have been shown to dramatically alter their transcriptome upon stimulation. We demonstrate that use of enzymatic dissociation methods on mouse central nervous system (CNS) tissue induces an aberrant gene expression signature in microglia that can significantly confound downstream analysis. To minimize this issue, we developed a flexible protocol, that can be used with existing enzymatic protocols for fresh tissue, to eliminate artifactual gene expression while allowing for increased cell type diversity and yield. We demonstrate efficacy of this protocol in analysis of diverse CNS cell types and sorted myeloid populations while using enzymatic dissociation. Generation of new and reanalysis of previously published human brain single nucleus RNAseq (snRNA-seq) datasets reveal that a similar signature is also present in post-mortem tissue. Through novel snRNA-seq analysis of acutely-resected neurosurgical tissue we demonstrate that this signature can be induced in human tissue due to technical differences in sample processing. These results provide key insight into the potential confounds of enzymatic digestion and provide a solution to allow for enzymatic digestion for scRNA-seq while avoiding ex vivo transcriptional artifacts. Analysis of human tissue reveals potential for artifacts in current and future snRNA-seq datasets that will require deeper analysis and careful consideration to separate true biology from artifacts related to post-mortem processes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
P2RY12 has been shown to play a role in microglia migration, activation, and neuronal activity.
“P2RY12 has been shown to play a role in microglia migration, activation, and neuronal activity64,75.”
From Genetic analysis of the human microglial transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies (2022) · cites this paper as [75]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Molecular Architecture of the Mouse Nervous System
Zeisel, A., Hochgerner, H., Lönnerberg, P., Johnsson, A., Memic, F., van der Zwan, J., Häring, M., Braun, E., Borm, L. E., La Manno, G., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.021 · Cited by 2,995 · see citing works
Molecular diversity and specializations among the cells of the adult mouse brain
Saunders, A., Macosko, E. Z., Wysoker, A., Goldman, M., Krienen, F. M., de Rivera, H., Bien, E., Baum, M., Bortolin, L., Wang, S., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.028 · Cited by 1,847 · see citing works
Self-citationMassively parallel single-nucleus RNA-seq with DroNc-seq
Habib, N., Avraham-Davidi, I., Basu, A., Burks, T., Shekhar, K., Hofree, M., Choudhury, S. R., Aguet, F., Gelfand, E., Ardlie, K., et al. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4407 · Cited by 1,069 · see citing works
Microglial signatures and their role in health and disease
Butovsky, O., & Weiner, H. L. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-018-0057-5 · Cited by 1,046 · see citing works
An integrated transcriptomic and epigenomic atlas of mouse primary motor cortex cell types
Yao, Z., Liu, H., Xie, F., Fischer, S., Booeshaghi, A. S., Adkins, R. S., Aldridge, A. I., Ament, S. A., Pinto-Duarte, A., Bartlett, A., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.02.29.970558 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Svensson, V., da Veiga Beltrame, E. & Pachter, L. A curated database reveals trends in single-cell transcriptomics. Database (Oxford) 2020 (2020).
- Crowell, H. L. et al. muscat detects subpopulation-specific state transitions from multi-sample multi-condition single-cell transcriptomics data. Nat. Commun. 11, 6077 (2020).
- Squair, J. W. et al. Confronting false discoveries in single-cell differential expression. Nat. Commun. 12, 5692 (2021).
- Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
- Chari, T., Banerjee, J. & Pachter, L. The specious art of single-cell genomics. Preprint at bioRxiv, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.25. 457696v3 (2021). · DOI
- Gao, L. L., Bien, J. & Witten, D. Selective Inference for Hierarchical Clustering. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.02936 (2020). · arXiv
- Lähnemann, D. et al. Eleven grand challenges in single-cell data science. Genome Biol. 21, 31 (2020).
- Doberentz, E. & Madea, B. in Regulation of Heat Shock Protein Responses: Heat Shock Proteins (eds Asea, A. A. A. & Kaur, P.) Ch. 18 (Springer International Publishing, 2018).
- Lacar, B. et al. Nuclear RNA-seq of single neurons reveals molecular signatures of activation. Nat. Commun. 7, 11022 (2016).
- Denisenko, E. et al. Systematic assessment of tissue dissociation and storage biases in single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq workflows. Genome Biol. 21, 130 (2020).
- Miller, J. A. et al. Neuropathological and transcriptomic characteristics of the aged brain. eLife 6, e31126 (2017).
- Lun, A. T., Bach, K. & Marioni, J. C. Pooling across cells to normalize single- cell RNA sequencing data with many zero counts. Genome Biol. 17, 75 (2016).
- Finak, G. et al. MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 16, 278 (2015).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lopes, K. D. P., Snijders, G. J. L., Humphrey, J., Allan, A., Sneeboer, M. A. M., Navarro, E., Schilder, B. M., Vialle, R. A., Parks, M., Missall, R., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00976-y · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Da Mesquita, S., Herz, J., Wall, M., Dykstra, T., de Lima, K. A., Norris, G. T., Dabhi, N., Kennedy, T., Baker, W., & Kipnis, J. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abe4601 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
- Authors
- Marsh, S. E., Kamath, T., Walker, A. J., Dissing-Olesen, L., Hammond, T. R., Young, A. M. H., Abdulraouf, A., Nadaf, N., Dufort, C., Murphy, S., Kozareva, V., Vanderburg, C., Hong, S., Bulstrode, H., Hutchinson, P. J., Gaffney, D. J., Franklin, R. J. M., Macosko, E. Z., & Stevens, B.
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2020-12-03
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 5
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
