BNT162b2 induces SARS-CoV-2-neutralising antibodies and T cells in humans
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41586-021-03653-6 · Paper page
Abstract
BNT162b2, a lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulated nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (mRNA) encoding the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein (S) stabilized in the prefusion conformation, has demonstrated 95% efficacy to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Recently, we reported preliminary BNT162b2 safety and antibody response data from an ongoing placebo-controlled, observer-blinded phase 1/2 vaccine trial 1 . We present here antibody and T cell responses from a second, non-randomized open-label phase 1/2 trial in healthy adults, 19-55 years of age, after BNT162b2 prime/boost vaccination at 1 to 30 µg dose levels. BNT162b2 elicited strong antibody responses, with S-binding IgG concentrations above those in a COVID-19 human convalescent sample (HCS) panel. Day 29 (7 days post-boost) SARS-CoV-2 serum 50% neutralising geometric mean titers were 0.3-fold (1 µg) to 3.3-fold (30 µg) those of the HCS panel. The BNT162b2-elicited sera neutralised pseudoviruses with diverse SARS-CoV-2 S variants. Concurrently, in most participants, S-specific CD8 + and T helper type 1 (T H 1) CD4 + T cells had expanded, with a high fraction producing interferon-γ (IFNγ). Using peptide MHC multimers, the epitopes recognised by several BNT162b2-induced CD8 + T cells when presented on frequent MHC alleles were identified. CD8 + T cells were shown to be of the early-differentiated effector-memory phenotype, with single specificities reaching 0.01-3% of circulating CD8 + T cells. In summary, vaccination with BNT162b2 at well tolerated doses elicits a combined adaptive humoral and cellular immune response, which together may contribute to protection against COVID-19.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Peak neutralizing antibody levels after licensed SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are about half to four times those observed in convalescent individuals.
“the currently licensed vaccines have been shown to produce peak neutralizing antibody responses that range from approximately half to four-times those seen in convalescent patients24,64–67 (preprint data, not yet peer reviewed)68.”
From Prospects for durable immune control of SARS-CoV-2 and prevention of reinfection (2021) · cites this paper as [68]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 914
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Walsh, E. E. et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of Two RNA-Based Covid-19 Vaccine Candidates. N. Engl. J. Med. NEJMoa2027906 (2020). doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2027906 · DOI · Paper page
- Pardi, N. et al. Nucleoside-modified mRNA immunization elicits influenza virus hemagglutinin stalk-specific antibodies. Nat. Commun. 9, 3361 (2018).
- Mulligan, M. J. et al. Phase 1/2 study of COVID-19 RNA vaccine BNT162b1 in adults. Nature (2020). doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2639-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhang, L. et al. The D614G mutation in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein reduces S1 shedding and increases infectivity. bioRxiv Prepr. Serv. Biol. (2020). doi:bioRxiv: 10.1101/2020.06.12.148726 · DOI
- Muruato, A. E. et al. A high-throughput neutralizing antibody assay for COVID-19 diagnosis and vaccine evaluation. bioRxiv Prepr. Serv. Biol. Accepted at Nat Comun. (2020). doi:bioRxiv: 10.1101/2020.05.21.109546 . · DOI
- Poran, A. et al. Sequence-based prediction of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine targets using a mass spectrometry-based bioinformatics predictor identifies immunogenic T cell epitopes. Genome Med. 12, 70 (2020).
- Svitek, N. et al. Use of 'one-pot, mix-and-read' peptide-MHC class I tetramers and predictive algorithms to improve detection of cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses in cattle. Vet. Res. 45, 50 (2014).
- Leisner, C. et al. One-pot, mix-and-read peptide-MHC tetramers. PLoS One 3, e1678 (2008).
- Authors
- Sahin, U., Muik, A., Vogler, I., Derhovanessian, E., Kranz, L. M., Vormehr, M., Quandt, J., Bidmon, N., Ulges, A., Baum, A., Pascal, K., Maurus, D., Brachtendorf, S., Lörks, V., Sikorski, J., Koch, P., Hilker, R., Becker, D., Eller, A.-K., Grützner, J., Tonigold, M., Boesler, C., Rosenbaum, C., Heesen, L., Kühnle, M.-C., Poran, A., Dong, J. Z., Luxemburger, U., Kemmer-Brück, A., Langer, D., Bexon, M., Bolte, S., Palanche, T., Schultz, A., Baumann, S., Mahiny, A. J., Boros, G., Reinholz, J., Szabó, G. T., Karikó, K., Shi, P.-Y., Fontes-Garfias, C., Perez, J. L., Cutler, M., Cooper, D., Kyratsous, C. A., Dormitzer, P. R., Jansen, K. U., & Türeci, Ö.
- Affiliations
- BioNTech (Germany) (DE)
- Regeneron (United States) (US)
- BioNTech (United States) (US)
- Bexon Clinical Consulting (United States) (US)
- Clinical Research Services (DE)
- The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
- Pfizer (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Sahin, Ugur
- Muik, Alexander
- Vogler, Isabel
- Kranz, Lena M.
- Vormehr, Mathias
- Quandt, Jasmin
- Baum, Alina
- Pascal, Kristen
- Maurus, Daniel
- Lörks, Verena
- Koch, Peter
- Hilker, Rolf
- Becker, Dirk
- Boesler, Carsten
- Kühnle, Marie-Cristine
- Poran, Asaf
- Dong, Jesse Z.
- Luxemburger, Ulrich
- Bexon, Martin
- Baumann, Sybille
- Mahiny, Azita J.
- Boros, Gábor
- Reinholz, Jonas
- Szabó, Gábor T.
- Karikó, Katalin
- Shi, Pei-Yong
- Fontes-Garfias, Camila
- Cutler, Mark
- Cooper, David
- Kyratsous, Christos A.
- Dormitzer, Philip R.
- Jansen, Kathrin U.
- Türeci, Özlem
- Venue
- Nature
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2020-12-11
- Volume
- 595
- Issue
- 7868
- Pages
- 572-577
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3164002264
- Cited by
- 914
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 181 · 2022: 290 · 2021: 214 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 61.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Keywords
- BNT162b2, COVID-19 vaccines, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, neutralizing antibodies, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T helper cells, T cell epitopes, MHC alleles, vaccine-induced immune response, SARS-CoV-2 variants, mRNA vaccines, lipid nanoparticle formulation, prime-boost vaccination
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, BNT162 Vaccine, Adolescent, Adult, Antibodies, Viral, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Immunologic Memory, Interferon-gamma, Interleukin-2, Male, Middle Aged, T-Lymphocytes, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Th1 Cells, Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte, Young Adult, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review