PreprintCited by 1,257SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.351 variant in South Africa

Open access
Madhi, Shabir A., Baillie, Vicky, Cutland, Clare L., Voysey, Merryn, Koen, Anthonet L., Fairlie, Lee, Padayachee, Sherman D., Dheda, Keertan +45 more·2021·New England Journal of Medicine

Preprint — published as 10.1056/nejmoa2102214 · Paper page

Abstract

Background: Assessing safety and efficacy of Covid-19 vaccines in different populations is essential, as is investigation of efficacy against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern including the B.1.351 (501Y.V2) variant first identified in South Africa. Methods: We conducted a randomized multicentre, double blinded controlled trial on safety and efficacy of ChAdOx1-nCoV19 in HIV-uninfected people in South Africa. Participants age 18 to <65 years randomized (1:1) to two doses of vaccine containing 5×10 10 viral particles or placebo (0.9%NaCl) 21-35 days apart. Post 2 nd -dose serum samples (n=25) were tested by pseudotyped (PSVNA) and live virus (LVNA) neutralization assays against the D614G and B.1.351 variants. Primary endpoints were safety and vaccine efficacy (VE) >14 days following second dose against laboratory confirmed symptomatic Covid-19. Results: 2026 HIV-uninfected adults were enrolled between June 24 th and Nov 9 th , 2020; 1010 and 1011 received at least one dose of placebo or vaccine, respectively. Median age was 31 years. The B.1.351 variant showed increased resistance to vaccinee sera using the PSVNA and LVNA. In the primary endpoint analysis, 23/717 (3.2%) placebo and 19/750 (2.5%) vaccine recipients developed mild-moderate Covid-19; VE 21.9% (95%Confidence Interval: −49.9; 59.8). Of the primary endpoint cases, 39/42 (92.9%) were the B.1.351 variant; against which VE was 10.4% (95%CI: −76.8; 54.8) analyzed as a secondary objective. The incidence of serious adverse events was balanced between the vaccine and placebo groups. Conclusions: A two-dose regimen of ChAdOx1-nCoV19 did not show protection against mild-moderate Covid-19 due to B.1.351 variant, however, VE against severe Covid-19 is undetermined. (Funded by The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and South African Medical Research Council; ClinicalTrails.gov number, NCT04444674 ).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.02.10.21251247

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Madhi, S. A., Baillie, V., Cutland, C. L., Voysey, M., Koen, A. L., Fairlie, L., Padayachee, S. D., Dheda, K., Barnabas, S. L., Bhorat, Q. E., Briner, C., Kwatra, G., NGS-SA, Wits-VIDA COVID team, Ahmed, K., Aley, P., Bhikha, S., Bhiman, J. N., Bhorat, A. E., Plessis, J. D., Esmail, A., Groenewald, M., Horne, E., Hwa, S.-H., Jose, A., Lambe, T., Laubscher, M., Malahleha, M., Masenya, M., Masilela, M., McKenzie, S., Molapo, K., Moultrie, A., Oelofse, S., Patel, F., Pillay, S., Rhead, S., Rodel, H., Rossouw, L., Taoushanis, C., Tegally, H., Thombrayil, A., Eck, S. V., Wibmer, C. K., Durham, N. M., Kelly, E. J., Villafana, T. L., Gilbert, S., Pollard, A. J., de Oliveira, T., Moore, P. L., Sigal, A., & Izu, A.
Affiliations
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Setshaba Research Centre (ZA)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • Soweto CTC (ZA)
  • National Health Laboratory Service (ZA)
  • Africa Health Research Institute (ZA)
  • Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology (DE)
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Madhi, Shabir A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-02-12
Volume
384
Issue
20
Pages
1885-1898
ISSN
0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3139533040
Cited by
1,257
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 135 · 2022: 413 · 2021: 600 · 2020: 2
FWCI
96.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-017710, INV-018944)
  • AstraZeneca
  • Massachusetts Medical Society
  • UK Research and Innovation (MC_PC_19055)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (COV19OxfordVaccine01, MC_PC_19055)
  • Department of Health and Social Care
  • University of Oxford
  • National Research Foundation (98341)
  • South African Medical Research Council (RFA-EMU-02-2017, TMA-2015SF-1043, 96167, 98341, TMA-1051-TESAII)
  • University of Cape Town
  • National Institutes of Health (98341, RFA-EMU-02-2017)
  • Medical Research Council
  • Fogarty International Center (R21TW011454)
  • European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (TMA 2015 SF - 1043, TMA‐1051‐TESAII, TMA 2015 CDF - 1052)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, B.1.351 variant, SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, neutralizing antibodies, pseudovirus neutralization, symptomatic COVID-19, vaccine safety, adenovirus vector vaccine
MeSH terms
Immunogenicity, Vaccine, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, COVID-19 Serological Testing, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Adenoviridae, Adolescent, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Middle Aged, South Africa, T-Lymphocytes, Treatment Failure, Young Adult, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Vaccine Potency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review