PreprintCited by 64Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications

Continuous Polony Gels for Tissue Mapping with High Resolution and RNA Capture Efficiency

Open access
Fu, Xiaonan, Sun, Li, Chen, Jane Y., Dong, Runze, Lin, Yiing, Palmiter, Richard D., Lin, Shin, Gu, Liangcai·2021·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

Current technologies for acquiring spatial transcript information from tissue sections rely on either RNA probes or spatial barcodes. The former methods require a priori knowledge for probeset formulation; the latter have yet to achieve single cell resolution and/or transcript capture efficiencies approaching dissociative, single-cell methods. Here, we describe a novel spatial transcriptome assay called p olony (or DNA cluster)- i nde xe d l ibrary-sequencing (PIXEL-seq). It improves upon other spatial barcoding methods by employing “continuous” polony oligos arrayed across a customized gel surface. In terms of assay performance, PIXEL-seq attains ≤ 1 µm resolution and captures >1,000 unique molecular identifiers/10×10 µm 2 . In other words, this global, naive platform achieves subcellular spatial transcriptome mapping while maintaining high transcript capture efficiencies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.03.17.435795

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have shown that KLK6 and MBP expression is restricted to oligodendrocytes, while ATP1B1 is mainly expressed in neurons and astrocytes.

    “Previous studies have shown that KLK6 and MBP expression is restricted to oligodendrocytes, while ATP1B1 is mainly expressed in neurons and astrocytes 19 .”

    From SpaGCN: Integrating gene expression, spatial location and histology to identify spatial domains and spatially variable genes by graph convolutional network (2021) · cites this paper as [19]

    The passages on mouse brain expression patterns (Abstract, page unavailable) and the marker-gene list in Figure 3 (PIXEL-seq data analysis, page unavailable) discuss other genes, not the claimed cell-type distributions. Searches for KLK6, MBP, ATP1B1, and oligodendrocytes found no passage in our copy addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. R. Bumgarner, in Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. (2013), chap. 22, pp. 22.21.21-22.21.11.
  2. R. D. Mitra, G. M. Church, In situ localized amplification and contact replication of many individual DNA molecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, e34 (1999).
  3. N. E. Broude, K. Woodward, R. Cavallo, C. R. Cantor, D. Englert, DNA microarrays with stem-loop DNA probes: preparation and applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, e92 (2001).
  4. A. Chen, S. Liao, M. Cheng, K. Ma, L. Wu, Y. Lai, J. Yang, W. Li, J. Xu, S. Hao, X. Chen, X. Liu, X. Huang, F. Lin, X. Tang, Z. Li, Y. Hong, D. Fu, Y. Jiang, J. Peng, S. Liu, M. Shen, C. Liu, Q. Li, Z. Wang, Z. Wang, X. Huang, Y. Yuan, G. Volpe, C. Ward, P. Muñoz-Cánoves, J. P. Thiery, F. Zhao, M. Li, H. Kuang, O. Wang, H. Lu, B. Wang, M. Ni, W. Zhang, F. Mu, Y. Yin, H. Yang, M. Lisby, R. J. Cornall, M. Uhlen, M. A. Esteban, Y. Li, L. Liu, J. Wang, X. Xu, Large field of view-spatially resolved transcriptomics at nanoscale resolution. bioRxiv, 2021.2001.2017.427004 (2021).
  5. Y. Hao, S. Hao, E. Andersen-Nissen, W. M. Mauck, S. Zheng, A. Butler, M. J. Lee, A. J. Wilk, C. Darby, M. Zagar, P. Hoffman, M. Stoeckius, E. Papalexi, E. P. Mimitou, J. Jain, A. Srivastava, T. Stuart, L. B. Fleming, B. Yeung, A. J. Rogers, J. M. McElrath, C. A. Blish, R. Gottardo, P. Smibert, R. Satija, Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. bioRxiv, 2020.2010.2012.335331 (2020).
  6. K. Lebrigand, J. Bergenstråhle, K. Thrane, A. Mollbrink, P. Barbry, R. Waldmann, J. Lundeberg, The spatial landscape of gene expression isoforms in tissue sections. bioRxiv, 2020.2008.2024.252296 (2020).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fu, X., Sun, L., Chen, J. Y., Dong, R., Lin, Y., Palmiter, R. D., Lin, S., & Gu, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Gu, Liangcai
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-03-17
OpenAlex
W3138548670
Cited by
64
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 8
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
University of Washington
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Keywords
spatial transcriptomics, single-cell resolution, unique molecular identifiers, tissue sections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review