PreprintCited by 9Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingGene Regulatory Network AnalysisMelanoma and MAPK Pathways

Optogenetic actuator/ERK biosensor circuits identify MAPK network nodes that shape ERK dynamics

Open access
Dessauges, Coralie, Mikelson, Jan, Dobrzyński, Maciej, Jacques, Marc-Antoine, Frismantiene, Agne, Gagliardi, Paolo Armando, Khammash, Mustafa, Pertz, Olivier·2021·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.15252/msb.202110670 · Paper page

Abstract

Combining single-cell measurements of ERK activity dynamics with perturbations provides insights into the MAPK network topology. We built circuits consisting of an optogenetic actuator to activate MAPK signaling and an ERK biosensor to measure single-cell ERK dynamics. This allowed us to conduct RNAi screens to investigate the role of 50 MAPK proteins in ERK dynamics. We found that the MAPK network is robust against most node perturbations. We observed that the ERK-RAF and the ERK-RSK2-SOS negative feedbacks operate simultaneously to regulate ERK dynamics. Bypassing the RSK2-mediated feedback, either by direct optogenetic activation of RAS, or by RSK2 perturbation, sensitized ERK dynamics to further perturbations. Similarly, targeting this feedback in a human ErbB2-dependent oncogenic signaling model increased the efficiency of a MEK inhibitor. The RSK2-mediated feedback is thus important for the ability of the MAPK network to produce consistent ERK outputs and its perturbation can enhance the efficiency of MAPK inhibitors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.07.27.453955

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Dessauges, C., Mikelson, J., Dobrzyński, M., Jacques, M.-A., Frismantiene, A., Gagliardi, P. A., Khammash, M., & Pertz, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Pertz, Olivier
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-07-27
OpenAlex
W4253689655
Cited by
9
References
8
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of Bern
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020, 730964)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • SystemsX.ch
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Keywords
optogenetic actuators, single-cell signaling, network robustness, negative feedback, RSK2, Ras activation, RNAi screen, network topology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review