PreprintCited by 487Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Deep learning methods for designing proteins scaffolding functional sites

Open access
Wang, Jue, Lisanza, Sidney, Juergens, David, Tischer, Doug, Anishchenko, Ivan, Baek, Minkyung, Watson, Joseph L., Chun, Jung Ho +7 more·2021·Science

Preprint — published as 10.1126/science.abn2100 · Paper page

Abstract

Current approaches to de novo design of proteins harboring a desired binding or catalytic motif require pre-specification of an overall fold or secondary structure composition, and hence considerable trial and error can be required to identify protein structures capable of scaffolding an arbitrary functional site. Here we describe two complementary approaches to the general functional site design problem that employ the RosettaFold and AlphaFold neural networks which map input sequences to predicted structures. In the first “constrained hallucination” approach, we carry out gradient descent in sequence space to optimize a loss function which simultaneously rewards recapitulation of the desired functional site and the ideality of the surrounding scaffold, supplemented with problem-specific interaction terms, to design candidate immunogens presenting epitopes recognized by neutralizing antibodies, receptor traps for escape-resistant viral inhibition, metalloproteins and enzymes, and target binding proteins with designed interfaces expanding around known binding motifs. In the second “missing information recovery” approach, we start from the desired functional site and jointly fill in the missing sequence and structure information needed to complete the protein in a single forward pass through an updated RoseTTAFold trained to recover sequence from structure in addition to structure from sequence. We show that the two approaches have considerable synergy, and AlphaFold2 structure prediction calculations suggest that the approaches can accurately generate proteins containing a very wide array of functional sites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.11.10.468128

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J., Lisanza, S., Juergens, D., Tischer, D., Anishchenko, I., Baek, M., Watson, J. L., Chun, J. H., Milles, L. F., Dauparas, J., Expòsit, M., Yang, W., Saragovi, A., Ovchinnikov, S., & Baker, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Jue
  • Lisanza, Sidney
  • Juergens, David
  • Tischer, Doug
  • Watson, Joseph L.
  • Ovchinnikov, Sergey
  • Baker, David
Venue
Science
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-11-12
Volume
377
Issue
6604
Pages
387-394
ISSN
0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4286488966
Cited by
487
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 84 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 1
FWCI
32.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Washington Research Foundation
  • Amgen
  • Open Philanthropy Project
  • Fundación Bancaria Caixa d'Estalvis i Pensions de Barcelona
  • National Institutes of Health (DP5OD026389, HHSN272201700059C)
  • National Institute on Aging (U19AG065156)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA240339)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN272201700059C)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
protein scaffolding, protein design, deep learning, inpainting, RoseTTAFold, immunogen, metalloproteins, enzyme design, protein structure prediction
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Binding Sites, Catalysis, Protein Binding, Proteins, Protein Engineering, Protein Structure, Secondary, Protein Folding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review