Deep learning methods for designing proteins scaffolding functional sites
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1126/science.abn2100 · Paper page
Abstract
Current approaches to de novo design of proteins harboring a desired binding or catalytic motif require pre-specification of an overall fold or secondary structure composition, and hence considerable trial and error can be required to identify protein structures capable of scaffolding an arbitrary functional site. Here we describe two complementary approaches to the general functional site design problem that employ the RosettaFold and AlphaFold neural networks which map input sequences to predicted structures. In the first “constrained hallucination” approach, we carry out gradient descent in sequence space to optimize a loss function which simultaneously rewards recapitulation of the desired functional site and the ideality of the surrounding scaffold, supplemented with problem-specific interaction terms, to design candidate immunogens presenting epitopes recognized by neutralizing antibodies, receptor traps for escape-resistant viral inhibition, metalloproteins and enzymes, and target binding proteins with designed interfaces expanding around known binding motifs. In the second “missing information recovery” approach, we start from the desired functional site and jointly fill in the missing sequence and structure information needed to complete the protein in a single forward pass through an updated RoseTTAFold trained to recover sequence from structure in addition to structure from sequence. We show that the two approaches have considerable synergy, and AlphaFold2 structure prediction calculations suggest that the approaches can accurately generate proteins containing a very wide array of functional sites.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
De novo protein design by deep network hallucination
Anishchenko, I., Chidyausiku, T. M., Ovchinnikov, S., Pellock, S. J., & Baker, D. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.07.22.211482 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Self-citationHallucinating symmetric protein assemblies
Wicky, B. I. M., Milles, L. F., Courbet, A., Ragotte, R. J., Dauparas, J., Kinfu, E., Tipps, S., Kibler, R. D., Baek, M., DiMaio, F., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.add1964 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Self-citationComputational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development
Kim, J., McFee, M., Fang, Q., Abdin, O., & Kim, P. M. (2023) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2022.12.005 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, J., Lisanza, S., Juergens, D., Tischer, D., Anishchenko, I., Baek, M., Watson, J. L., Chun, J. H., Milles, L. F., Dauparas, J., Expòsit, M., Yang, W., Saragovi, A., Ovchinnikov, S., & Baker, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Jue
- Lisanza, Sidney
- Juergens, David
- Tischer, Doug
- Watson, Joseph L.
- Ovchinnikov, Sergey
- Baker, David
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2021-11-12
- Volume
- 377
- Issue
- 6604
- Pages
- 387-394
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9621694
- OpenAlex
- W4286488966
- Cited by
- 487
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 84 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 32.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Washington Research Foundation
- Amgen
- Open Philanthropy Project
- Fundación Bancaria Caixa d'Estalvis i Pensions de Barcelona
- National Institutes of Health (DP5OD026389, HHSN272201700059C)
- National Institute on Aging (U19AG065156)
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA240339)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN272201700059C)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- protein scaffolding, protein design, deep learning, inpainting, RoseTTAFold, immunogen, metalloproteins, enzyme design, protein structure prediction
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Binding Sites, Catalysis, Protein Binding, Proteins, Protein Engineering, Protein Structure, Secondary, Protein Folding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review