PreprintCited by 356SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron or Delta symptomatic infection and severe outcomes

Open access
Buchan, Sarah A., Chung, Hannah, Brown, Kevin A., Austin, Peter C., Fell, Deshayne B., Gubbay, Jonathan B., Nasreen, Sharifa, Schwartz, Kevin L. +5 more·2022·JAMA Network Open

Preprint — published as 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32760 · Paper page

Abstract

Background: The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, including among those who have received 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines, increased substantially following the emergence of Omicron in Ontario, Canada. Methods: Applying the test-negative study design to linked provincial databases, we estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic infection and severe outcomes (hospitalization or death) caused by Omicron or Delta between December 6 and 26, 2021. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the effectiveness of 2 or 3 COVID-19 vaccine doses by time since the latest dose, compared to unvaccinated individuals. Results: We included 16,087 Omicron-positive cases, 4,261 Delta-positive cases, and 114,087 test-negative controls. VE against symptomatic Delta infection declined from 89% (95%CI, 86-92%) 7-59 days after a second dose to 80% (95%CI, 74-84%) after ≥240 days, but increased to 97% (95%CI, 96-98%) ≥7 days after a third dose. VE against symptomatic Omicron infection was only 36% (95%CI, 24-45%) 7-59 days after a second dose and provided no protection after ≥180 days, but increased to 61% (95%CI, 56-65%) ≥7 days after a third dose. VE against severe outcomes was very high following a third dose for both Delta and Omicron (99% [95%CI, 98-99%] and 95% [95%CI, 87-98%], respectively). Conclusions: In contrast to high levels of protection against both symptomatic infection and severe outcomes caused by Delta, our results suggest that 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines only offer modest and short-term protection against symptomatic Omicron infection. A third dose improves protection against symptomatic infection and provides excellent protection against severe outcomes for both variants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.12.30.21268565

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Consistent findings were reached, indicating rapid waning of vaccine protection against symptomatic Omicron infection, consistent with findings of other studies for effectiveness against Omicron infection (with no BA.1/BA.2 subvariant specified).

    “Notwithstanding these limitations, consistent findings were reached, indicating rapid waning of vaccine protection against symptomatic Omicron infection that are consistent with findings of other studies for effectiveness against Omicron infection (with no BA.1/BA.2 subvariant specified)42–48.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 29 · Cited by 356

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Sheikh A, Kerr S, Woolhouse M, et al. Severity of Omicron variant of concern and vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease: national cohort with nested test negative design study in Scotland. Preprint 2021 [Available from: https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/245818096/Severity_of_Omicron_variant_of_c oncern_and_vaccine_effectiveness_against_symptomatic_disease.pdf.
  2. Thompson MG, Natarajan K, Irving SA, et al. Effectiveness of a Third Dose of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19-Associated Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters and Hospitalizations Among Adults During Periods of Delta and Omicron Variant Predominance - VISION Network, 10 States, August 2021-January 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022:ePub: 21 January 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7104e3external. · DOI
  3. Buchan SA, Chung H, Brown KA, et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron or Delta infection. medRxiv 2022:2021.12.30.21268565. doi: 10.1101/2021.12.30.21268565
  4. Pfizer Press Release. Pfizer and BioNTech Provide Update on Omicron Variant 2021 [cited 2021 22 December]. Available from: https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release- detail/pfizer-and-biontech-provide-update-omicron-variant.

Authors
Buchan, S. A., Chung, H., Brown, K. A., Austin, P. C., Fell, D. B., Gubbay, J. B., Nasreen, S., Schwartz, K. L., Sundaram, M. E., Tadrous, M., Wilson, K., Wilson, S. E., & Kwong, J. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
Kwong, Jeffrey C.
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-01-01
Volume
5
Issue
9
Pages
e2232760-e2232760
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4296686923
Cited by
356
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 121
FWCI
41.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Federal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • SUNY Digital Repository Support (State University of New York System) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
  • Cancer Care Ontario
  • Public Health Agency of Canada (CNF 151944, 151944)
  • Public Health Agency
  • University of Toronto
  • Canadian Immunization Research Network (CNF 151944)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (151944, COVID-19, 151944_1)
  • Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 vaccines, vaccine effectiveness, Omicron variant, Delta variant, SARS-CoV-2, symptomatic infection, hospitalization, COVID-19 mortality, booster vaccination, test-negative case-control, Ontario, COVID-19 vaccination policy, vaccine hesitancy, health system capacity
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Adult, Hepatitis D, Female, Humans, Influenza, Human, Influenza Vaccines, Male, Ontario, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review