PreprintCited by 23Protein Structure and DynamicsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sequence Coverage Visualizer: A web application for protein sequence coverage 3D visualization

Open access
Shao, Xinhao, Grams, Christopher, Gao, Yu·2022·Journal of Proteome Research

Preprint — published as 10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00358 · Paper page

Abstract

Protein structure is connected with its function and interaction and plays an extremely important role in protein characterization. As one of the most important analytical methods for protein characterization, Proteomics is widely used to determine protein composition, quantitation, interaction, and even structures. However, due to the gap between identified proteins by proteomics and available 3D structures, it was very challenging, if not impossible, to visualize proteomics results in 3D and further explore the structural aspects of proteomics experiments. Recently, two groups of researchers from DeepMind and Baker lab have independently published protein structure prediction tools that can help us obtain predicted protein structures for the whole human proteome. Although there is still debate on the validity of some of the predicted structures, it is no doubt that these represent the most accurate predictions to date. More importantly, this enabled us to visualize the majority of human proteins for the first time. To help other researchers best utilize these protein structure predictions, we present the Sequence Coverage Visualizer (SCV), http://scv.lab.gy , a web application for protein sequence coverage 3D visualization. Here we showed a few possible usages of the SCV, including the labeling of post-translational modifications and isotope labeling experiments. These results highlight the usefulness of such 3D visualization for proteomics experiments and how SCV can turn a regular result list into structural insights. Furthermore, when used together with limited proteolysis, we demonstrated that SCV can help validate and compare different protein structures, including predicted ones and existing PDB entries. By performing limited proteolysis on native proteins at various time points, SCV can visualize the progress of the digestion. This time-series data further allowed us to compare the predicted structure and existing PDB entries. Although not deterministic, these comparisons could be used to refine current predictions further and represent an important step towards a complete and correct protein structure database. Overall, SCV is a convenient and powerful tool for visualizing proteomics results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.01.12.476109

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.18388/abp.2004_3573 · DOI
  2. 10.1021/pr200271w · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nprot.2017.100 · DOI
  4. 2021, Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome, Nature, 596, 590, 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 2021, Protein Footprinting via Covalent Protein Painting Reveals Structural Changes of the Proteome in Alzheimer’s Disease, J. Proteome Res, 20, 2762, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00912 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/nbt.2377 · DOI
  7. 2017, MSFragger: ultrafast and comprehensive peptide identification in mass spectrometry–based proteomics, Nat. Methods, 14, 513, 10.1038/nmeth.4256 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Shao, X., Grams, C., & Gao, Y.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Gao, Yu
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-01-13
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
343-349
ISSN
1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311292830
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Proteome Research (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM133416)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein sequence coverage, web application, protein structure prediction, human proteome, isotopic labeling, limited proteolysis, proteomics data visualization
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Humans, Peptides, Software, Proteome, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review