PreprintCited by 12SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Excess COVID-19-associated deaths among the unvaccinated population ≥18 years old in the United States, May 30 – December 4, 2021

Open access
Jia, Katherine M., Hanage, William P., Lipsitch, Marc, Swerdlow, David L.·2022·medRxiv

Abstract

Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 were authorized at the end of 2020 and are effective in preventing deaths; however, many persons remain unvaccinated. Using weekly publicly available CDC data of COVID-19-associated death rates by age and vaccination status from 26 US jurisdictions, we estimated the number of excess deaths that might have been averted by vaccination among unvaccinated persons ≥ 18 years old from May 30 to December 4, 2021. We subtracted the death rate in the vaccinated from rates in the unvaccinated to estimate the death rate each week that could be attributable to non-vaccination and multiplied this rate difference by the number of people in the unvaccinated group for each age group and each week, to estimate the excess mortality among the unvaccinated. Then, we extrapolated the number of deaths due to non-vaccination in the 26 jurisdictions to the whole US population using 2020 census estimates. In the 26 participating jurisdictions there were an estimated 83,400 excess deaths among the unvaccinated from May 30 to December 4, 2021. The largest number of excess deaths occurred in those 65–79 years old (n=28,900; 34.7% of total), followed by those 50-64 years old (n=25,900; 31.1%). Extrapolated to the US population we estimated approximately 135,000 excess deaths during the study period in persons ≥18 years old. Our estimates are an underestimate of all excess deaths that have occurred since vaccine became available because our analysis period was limited to May 30 to December 4, 2021, and many excess deaths occurred before and after this period. In summary, we used retrospective data to estimate the substantial number of COVID-19-associated deaths among the unvaccinated illustrating the importance of vaccination to prevent further unnecessary mortality during this pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.02.10.22270823

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jia, K. M., Hanage, W. P., Lipsitch, M., & Swerdlow, D. L.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Swerdlow, David L.
Venue
medRxiv
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-02-13
OpenAlex
W4213051779
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nd
Locations
medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 vaccination, unvaccinated population, excess mortality, age differences in mortality, vaccine effectiveness, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review