PreprintCited by 2Treatment of Major DepressionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Ketamine and its metabolite 2R,6R-hydroxynorketamine promote ocular dominance plasticity and release TRKB from inhibitory control without changing perineuronal nets enwrapping parvalbumin interneurons

Open access
Cannarozzo, Cecilia, Rubiolo, Anna, Casarotto, Plinio, Castrén, Eero·2022·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

Ketamine has been described as a fast-acting antidepressant, exerting effects in depressed patients and in preclinical models with a rapid onset of action. The typical antidepressant fluoxetine is known to induce plasticity in the adult rodent visual cortex, as assessed by a shift in ocular dominance, a classical model of brain plasticity, and a similar effect has been described for ketamine and its metabolite 2R,6R-hydroxynorketamine (R,R-HNK). Here, we demonstrate that ketamine (at 3 or 20 mg/kg) and R,R-HNK facilitated the shift in ocular dominance in monocularly deprived mice, after 3 injections, throughout the 8-days regimen. Notably, the comparison between the treatments indicates a higher effect size of R,R-HNK compared to ketamine. Treatment with ketamine or R,R-HNK failed to influence the levels of perineuronal nets (PNNs) surrounding parvalbumin-positive interneurons. However, we observed in vitro that both ketamine and R,R-HNK are able to disrupt the tropomyosin-related kinase B (TRKB) interaction with the protein tyrosine phosphatase sigma (PTPσ), which upon binding to PNNs dephosphorylates TRKB. These results support a model where diverse drugs promote the reinstatement of juvenile-like plasticity by directly binding TRKB and releasing it from PTPσ regulation, without necessarily affecting PNNs deposits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.04.06.487292

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both ketamine and R,R-HNK reactivate ODP in the murine visual cortex but do so with a much faster time scale than fluoxetine.

    “Using the same model, both ketamine and its metabolite R,R-HNK also reactivate ODP in the murine visual cortex but do so with a much faster time scale than fluoxetine does, consistent with their faster onset of antidepressant-like effects (Casarotto et al., 2021;Cannarozzo et al., 2022).”

    From Psychedelics and Neural Plasticity: Therapeutic Implications (2022) · cites this paper as Cannarozzo et al., 2022

  • R,R-HNK produces an ODP response comparable to that of fluoxetine, but preliminary data suggest the size of the effects of ketamine is more restricted, albeit significant.

    “R,R-HNK produces an ODP response comparable to that of fluoxetine, but preliminary data suggest that the size of the effects of ketamine is more restricted, albeit significant (Cannarozzo et al., 2022)”

    From Psychedelics and Neural Plasticity: Therapeutic Implications (2022) · cites this paper as Cannarozzo et al., 2022

  • Ketamine promotes ocular dominance plasticity in the binocular primary visual cortex (bV1).

    “The ability of ketamine to promote ODP in the binocular primary visual cortex (bV1) has recently been reported (Grieco et al., 2020;Casarotto et al., 2021, Cannarozzo et al., 2022).”

    From Psychedelics and Neural Plasticity: Therapeutic Implications (2022) · cites this paper as Cannarozzo et al., 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Abdallah, C. G., Sanacora, G., Duman, R. S., & Krystal, J. H. (2015). Ketamine and rapid-acting antidepressants: A window into a new neurobiology for mood disorder therapeutics. Annual Review of Medicine, 66, 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-053013-062946 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Autry, A. E., Adachi, M., Nosyreva, E., Na, E. S., Los, M. F., Cheng, P., Kavalali, E. T., & Monteggia, L. M. (2011). NMDA receptor blockade at rest triggers rapid behavioural antidepressant responses. Nature, 475(7354), 91-95. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10130 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Brückner, G., Szeöke, S., Pavlica, S., Grosche, J., & Kacza, J. (2006). Axon initial segment ensheathed by extracellular matrix in perineuronal nets. Neuroscience, 138(2), 365-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.11.068 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cang, J., Kalatsky, V. A., Löwel, S., & Stryker, M. P. (2005). Optical imaging of the intrinsic signal as a measure of cortical plasticity in the mouse. Vis. Neurosci., 22(5), 685-691.
  5. Casarotto, P. C., Girych, M., Fred, S. M., Kovaleva, V., Moliner, R., Enkavi, G., Biojone, C., Cannarozzo, C., Sahu, M. P., Kaurinkoski, K., Brunello, C. A., Steinzeig, A., Winkel, F., Patil, S., Vestring, S., Serchov, T., Diniz, C. R. A. F., Laukkanen, L., Cardon, I., … Castrén, E. (2021). Antidepressant drugs act by directly binding to TRKB neurotrophin receptors. Cell, 184(5), 1299-1313.e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.034 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Castrén, E., & Antila, H. (2017). Neuronal plasticity and neurotrophic factors in drug responses. Molecular Psychiatry, 22(8), 1085-1095. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017. · DOI
  7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Fong, M., Finnie, P. S., Kim, T., Thomazeau, A., Kaplan, E. S., Cooke, S. F., & Bear, M. F. (2020). Distinct Laminar Requirements for NMDA Receptors in Experience-Dependent Visual Cortical Plasticity. Cerebral Cortex, 30(4), 2555-2572. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhz260 · DOI
  9. Girgenti, M. J., Ghosal, S., LoPresto, D., Taylor, J. R., & Duman, R. S. (2017). Ketamine accelerates fear extinction via mTORC1 signaling. Neurobiology of Disease, 100, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2016.12.026 · DOI
  10. Gordon, J. A., & Stryker, M. P. (1996). Experience-dependent plasticity of binocular responses in the primary visual cortex of the mouse. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 16(10), 3274-3286.
  11. Grieco, S. F., Qiao, X., Zheng, X., Liu, Y., Chen, L., Zhang, H., Yu, Z., Gavornik, J. P., Lai, C., Gandhi, S. P., Holmes, T. C., & Xu, X. (2020). Subanesthetic Ketamine Reactivates Adult Cortical Plasticity to Restore Vision from Amblyopia. Current Biology, 30(18), 3591-3603.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.008 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hensch, T. K. (2005). Critical period plasticity in local cortical circuits. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 6(11), 877-888. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1787 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1970). The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. The Journal of Physiology, 206(2), 419-436.
  14. Kalatsky, V. A., & Stryker, M. P. (2003). New paradigm for optical imaging: Temporally encoded maps of intrinsic signal. Neuron, 38(4), 529-545.
  15. Karpova, N. N., Pickenhagen, A., Lindholm, J., Tiraboschi, E., Kulesskaya, N., Agústsdóttir, A., Antila, H., Popova, D., Akamine, Y., Bahi, A., Sullivan, R., Hen, R., Drew, L. J., & Castrén, E. (2011). Fear erasure in mice requires synergy between antidepressant drugs and extinction training. Science (New York, N.Y.), 334(6063), 1731-1734. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1214592 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Karson, C. N., Newton, J. E., Livingston, R., Jolly, J. B., Cooper, T. B., Sprigg, J., & Komoroski, R. A. (1993). Human brain fluoxetine concentrations. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 5, pp.322-322.
  17. Kleinschmidt, A., Bear, M., & Singer, W. (1987). Blockade of "NMDA" receptors disrupts experience-dependent plasticity of kitten striate cortex. Science, 238(4825), 355-358. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2443978 · DOI
  18. Krystal, J. H., Sanacora, G., & Duman, R. S. (2013). Rapid-Acting Glutamatergic Antidepressants: The Path to Ketamine and Beyond. Biological Psychiatry, 73(12), 1133-1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.03.026 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Kurihara, D., & Yamashita, T. (2012). Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycans Down-regulate Spine Formation in Cortical Neurons by Targeting Tropomyosin-related Kinase B (TrkB) Protein. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 287(17), 13822-13828. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.314070 · DOI
  20. Lavender, E., Hirasawa-Fujita, M., & Domino, E. F. (2020). Ketamine's dose related multiple mechanisms of actions: Dissociative anesthetic to rapid antidepressant. Behavioural Brain Research, 390, 112631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112631 · DOI
  21. Lehmann, K., & Löwel, S. (2008). Age-dependent ocular dominance plasticity in adult mice. PLoS One, 3(9), e3120.
  22. Lensjø, K. K., Lepperød, M. E., Dick, G., Hafting, T., & Fyhn, M. (2017). Removal of Perineuronal Nets Unlocks Juvenile Plasticity Through Network Mechanisms of Decreased Inhibition and Increased Gamma Activity. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(5), 1269-1283. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2504-16.2016 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Lumsden, E. W., Troppoli, T. A., Myers, S. J., Zanos, P., Aracava, Y., Kehr, J., Lovett, J., Kim, S., Wang, F.-H., Schmidt, S., Jenne, C. E., Yuan, P., Morris, P. J., Thomas, C. J., Zarate, C. A., Moaddel, R., Traynelis, S. F., Pereira, E. F. R., Thompson, S. M., … Gould, T. D. (2019). Antidepressant-relevant concentrations of the ketamine metabolite (2R,6R)-hydroxynorketamine do not block NMDA receptor function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(11), 5160-5169. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816071116 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Maeng, S., Zarate, C. A., Du, J., Schloesser, R. J., McCammon, J., Chen, G., & Manji, H. K. (2008). Cellular Mechanisms Underlying the Antidepressant Effects of Ketamine: Role of α-Amino-3-Hydroxy-5-Methylisoxazole-4-Propionic Acid Receptors. Biological Psychiatry, 63(4), 349-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.05.028 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Matuszko, G., Curreli, S., Kaushik, R., Becker, A., & Dityatev, A. (2017). Extracellular matrix alterations in the ketamine model of schizophrenia. Neuroscience, 350, 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.03.010 · DOI
  26. Maya Vetencourt, J. F., Sale, A., Viegi, A., Baroncelli, L., De Pasquale, R., O'Leary, O. F., Castrén, E., & Maffei, L. (2008). The antidepressant fluoxetine restores plasticity in the adult visual cortex. Science (New York, N.Y.), 320(5874), 385-388. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150516 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Ohira, K., Takeuchi, R., Iwanaga, T., & Miyakawa, T. (2013). Chronic fluoxetine treatment reduces parvalbumin expression and perineuronal netsin gamma-aminobutyric acidergic interneurons of the frontal cortex in adultmice. Molecular Brain, 6(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-6606-6-43 · DOI
  28. Pizzorusso, T., Medini, P., Berardi, N., Chierzi, S., Fawcett, J. W., & Maffei, L. (2002). Reactivation of Ocular Dominance Plasticity in the Adult Visual Cortex. Science, 298(5596), 1248-1251. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072699 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Pryazhnikov, E., Mugantseva, E., Casarotto, P., Kolikova, J., Fred, S. M., Toptunov, D., Afzalov, R., Hotulainen, P., Voikar, V., Terry-Lorenzo, R., Engel, S., Kirov, S., Castren, E., & Khiroug, L. (2018). Longitudinal two-photon imaging in somatosensory cortex of behaving mice reveals dendritic spine formation enhancement by subchronic administration of low-dose ketamine. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24933-8 · DOI
  30. Sahu, M. P., Nikkilä, O., Lågas, S., Kolehmainen, S., & Castrén, E. (2019). Culturing primary neurons from rat hippocampus and cortex. Neuronal Signaling, 3(2), NS20180207. https://doi.org/10.1042/NS20180207 · DOI
  31. Sale, A., Maya Vetencourt, J. F., Medini, P., Cenni, M. C., Baroncelli, L., De Pasquale, R., & Maffei, L. (2007). Environmental enrichment in adulthood promotes amblyopia recovery through a reduction of intracortical inhibition. Nature Neuroscience, 10(6), 679-681. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1899 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Sawtell, N. B., Frenkel, M. Y., Philpot, B. D., Nakazawa, K., Tonegawa, S., & Bear, M. F. (2003). NMDA receptor-dependent ocular dominance plasticity in adult visual cortex. Neuron, 38(6), 977-985.
  33. Steinzeig, A., Cannarozzo, C., & Castrén, E. (2019). Fluoxetine-induced plasticity in the visual cortex outlasts the duration of the naturally occurring critical period. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 50(10), 3663-3673. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14512 · DOI
  34. Steinzeig, A., Molotkov, D., & Castrén, E. (2017). Chronic imaging through "transparent skull" in mice. PLoS ONE, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181788 · DOI
  35. Venturino, A., Schulz, R., De Jesús-Cortés, H., Maes, M. E., Nagy, B., Reilly-Andújar, F., Colombo, G., Cubero, R. J. A., Schoot Uiterkamp, F. E., Bear, M. F., & Siegert, S. (2021). Microglia enable mature perineuronal nets disassembly upon anesthetic ketamine exposure or 60-Hz light entrainment in the healthy brain. Cell Reports, 36(1), 109313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109313 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Winkel, F., Ryazantseva, M., Voigt, M. B., Didio, G., Lilja, A., Llach Pou, M., Steinzeig, A., Harkki, J., Englund, J., Khirug, S., Rivera, C., Palva, S., Taira, T., Lauri, S. E., Umemori, J., & Castrén, E. (2021). Pharmacological and optical activation of TrkB in Parvalbumin interneurons regulate intrinsic states to orchestrate cortical plasticity. Molecular Psychiatry, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01211-0 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Zanos, P., Moaddel, R., Morris, P. J., Georgiou, P., Fischell, J., Elmer, G. I., Alkondon, M., Yuan, P., Pribut, H. J., Singh, N. S., Dossou, K. S. S., Fang, Y., Huang, X.-P., Mayo, C. L., Wainer, I. W., Albuquerque, E. X., Thompson, S. M., Thomas, C. J., Zarate, C. A., & Gould, T. D. (2016). NMDAR inhibition-independent antidepressant actions of ketamine metabolites. Nature, 533(7604), 481-486. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17998 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Zanos, P., Moaddel, R., Morris, P. J., Riggs, L. M., Highland, J. N., Georgiou, P., Pereira, E. F. R., Albuquerque, E. X., Thomas, C. J., Zarate, C. A., & Gould, T. D. (2018). Ketamine and Ketamine Metabolite Pharmacology: Insights into Therapeutic Mechanisms. Pharmacological Reviews, 70(3), 621-660. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.117.015198 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Zarate, C. A., Singh, J. B., Carlson, P. J., Brutsche, N. E., Ameli, R., Luckenbaugh, D. A., Charney, D. S., & Manji, H. K. (2006). A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63(8), 856-864. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.856 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Zarate, C. A., Singh, J. B., Quiroz, J. A., De Jesus, G., Denicoff, K. K., Luckenbaugh, D. A., Manji, H. K., & Charney, D. S. (2006). A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of memantine in the treatment of major depression. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(1), 153-155. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.153 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Psychedelics and Neural Plasticity: Therapeutic Implications

    Grieco, S. F., Castrén, E., Knudsen, G. M., Kwan, A. C., Olson, D. E., Zuo, Y., Holmes, T. C., & Xu, X. (2022) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1121-22.2022 · Cited by 82 · see citing works

    “R,R-HNK produces an ODP response comparable to that of fluoxetine, but preliminary data suggest that the size of the effects of ketamine is more restricted, albeit significant (Cannarozzo et al., 2022), perhaps because ketamine inhibits NMDARs, which is known to restrict ODP (Sawtell et al.”
    InfluentialSelf-citation

Authors
Cannarozzo, C., Rubiolo, A., Casarotto, P., & Castrén, E.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-04-09
OpenAlex
W4223443187
Cited by
2
References
4
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research (301225, 643417)
  • Academy of Finland (307416, 294710)
  • Suomen Kulttuurirahasto (00210254)
  • Jane ja Aatos Erkon Säätiö (307416, 643417, 322742)
  • Päivikki ja Sakari Sohlbergin Säätiö
  • Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö (307416, 322742, 643417)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (322742)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
ketamine, (2R,6R)-hydroxynorketamine, ocular dominance plasticity, TrkB, PTPσ, perineuronal nets, parvalbumin interneurons, monocular deprivation, visual cortex, rapid-acting antidepressants, synaptic plasticity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review