Removal of Perineuronal Nets Unlocks Juvenile Plasticity Through Network Mechanisms of Decreased Inhibition and Increased Gamma Activity
Open accessAbstract
Perineuronal nets (PNNs) are extracellular matrix structures mainly enwrapping parvalbumin-expressing inhibitory neurons. The assembly of PNNs coincides with the end of the period of heightened visual cortex plasticity in juveniles, whereas removal of PNNs in adults reopens for plasticity. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain elusive. We have used chronic electrophysiological recordings to investigate accompanying electrophysiological changes to activity-dependent plasticity and we report on novel mechanisms involved in both induced and critical period plasticity. By inducing activity-dependent plasticity in the visual cortex of adult rats while recording single unit and population activity, we demonstrate that PNN removal alters the balance between inhibitory and excitatory spiking activity directly. Without PNNs, inhibitory activity was reduced, whereas spiking variability was increased as predicted in a simulation with a Brunel neural network. Together with a shift in ocular dominance and large effects on unit activity during the first 48 h of monocular deprivation (MD), we show that PNN removal resets the neural network to an immature, juvenile state. Furthermore, in PNN-depleted adults as well as in juveniles, MD caused an immediate potentiation of gamma activity, suggesting a novel mechanism initiating activity-dependent plasticity and driving the rapid changes in unit activity. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Emerging evidence suggests a role for perineuronal nets (PNNs) in learning and regulation of plasticity, but the underlying mechanisms remain unresolved. Here, we used chronic in vivo extracellular recordings to investigate how removal of PNNs opens for plasticity and how activity-dependent plasticity affects neural activity over time. PNN removal caused reduced inhibitory activity and reset the network to a juvenile state. Experimentally induced activity-dependent plasticity by monocular deprivation caused rapid changes in single unit activity and a remarkable potentiation of gamma oscillations. Our results demonstrate how PNNs may be involved directly in stabilizing the neural network. Moreover, the immediate potentiation of gamma activity after plasticity onset points to potential new mechanisms for the initiation of activity-dependent plasticity.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Enzymatic removal of perineuronal nets in adult rat visual cortex reduces putative inhibitory spiking and increases spiking variability, shifting the network toward a juvenile-like state. During monocular deprivation, PNN-depleted adults and juveniles show immediate gamma potentiation and rapid ocular dominance plasticity.
Key findings
- chABC treatment reduced mean spiking activity of putative inhibitory units (p = 0.0009; n = 20 control, n = 22 chABC) but not putative excitatory units (p = 0.054; n = 102 control, n = 83 chABC), and increased spiking variability for both putative inhibitory (p = 0.02) and putative excitatory units (p = 0.002).
- PNN removal increased spontaneous LFP power in theta (7–10 Hz, p = 0.002) and low-gamma (30–40 Hz, p = 0.001) ranges, with no group differences during visually evoked activity.
- After monocular deprivation in chABC-treated adults, contralateral units showed reduced activity at 12 h (p = 0.005), ipsilateral units were potentiated at 24 h (p = 0.03), and after 5 d ocular dominance shifted toward the open ipsilateral eye (control vs chABC MD p = 0.0002; MD control vs MD chABC p = 0.001; control vs control MD p = 0.8).
- MD induced immediate gamma oscillations at ~40 and 55 Hz in chABC-treated adults but not controls (52–65 Hz: F = 8.69, p = 0.01; 35–48 Hz: F = 10.13, p = 0.01), and juvenile rats (P24–P26) showed similar gamma potentiation and spiking variability to chABC-treated adults (p = 0.68, chABC vs p25).
Methods
- Chronic extracellular tetrode recordings from V1 of awake, freely moving adult male Long-Evans rats: 18 adults total (12 for electrophysiology, 6 for histology alone) plus 3 juveniles implanted at P22; chABC was injected into binocular V1, and recordings began 3–14 d after treatment.
- Monocular deprivation was performed by eyelid suture, with unit and LFP recordings before and at 12, 24, and 48 h; ocular dominance index was assessed after 5 d under anesthesia.
- Single units were classified as narrow-spiking/putative inhibitory or broad-spiking/putative excitatory; LFP analyses included brain-state classification, gamma-event detection, power spectral density, and time-frequency representations; a Brunel network model of 10,000 integrate-and-fire neurons was simulated in NEST.
Limitations
- Stated: chABC is not selective to PNN components, though the authors cite link-protein knockout evidence that PNNs regulate plasticity; ODI recordings were performed under anesthesia, which can affect correlated activity and inhibitory/excitatory unit activity, so the authors cannot directly infer that awake MD unit changes correspond to anesthetized ODI recordings.
- Stated: visual responsiveness was low overall, possibly due to unbiased sampling, freely moving rats varying their visual field, and the rat visual field being mostly above the head; gamma oscillations were sparse compared with head-fixed mouse recordings, and future work should use tasks where gamma is expected to play a role.
- Stated and evident: juvenile circuitry may differ from resetting adult circuitry, requiring further work in genetically modified animals in which PNNs never form; the juvenile group was small (3 rats, 43 units), and some ODI groups were also small (e.g., MD control: 2 animals, 32 units).
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 67 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Putative inhibitory units from chABC-treated animals showed lower mean spiking activity compared with control animals.
“the pIN units from the chABCtreated animals (4 rats, 22 units) showed a lower mean spiking activity compared with control animals (4 rats, 20 units; Fig. 2B, p ϭ 0.0009, Mann-Whitney U test)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Increased spiking variability was predicted from reducing inhibition in a Brunel neural network simulation.
“Increased spiking variability was also predicted from reducing inhibition in a Brunel neural network simulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The distribution of excitatory and inhibitory units was unaffected by PNN degradation.
“As the distribution of excitatory and inhibitory units was unaffected by PNN degradation, we investigated whether their activity was different.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
chABC treatment eliminated almost all WFA signal within the first time point at 3 d after injection.
“The chABC treatment eliminated almost all WFA signal within the first time point at 3 d after injection”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Removal of PNNs is accompanied by increased spiking variability.
“Here, we show for the first time that removal of PNNs causes reduced activity of putative inhibitory neurons (Fig. 2) during both spontaneous and visually evoked activity and across brain states (Fig. 3), accompanied by increased spiking variability.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Spiking variability, measured by the coefficient of variation, was higher for units from chABC-treated animals compared with controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
Upon monocular deprivation start, juvenile rats showed a potentiation of high-frequency oscillations at approximately 40 Hz, similar to chABC-treated adult rats.
“However, upon MD start, we found a potentiation of high-frequency oscillations at ϳ40 Hz (Fig. 8C), similar to what we observed in chABC-treated adult rats.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Removal of PNNs causes reduced activity of putative inhibitory neurons during both spontaneous and visually evoked activity and across brain states.
“Here, we show for the first time that removal of PNNs causes reduced activity of putative inhibitory neurons (Fig. 2) during both spontaneous and visually evoked activity and across brain states (Fig. 3), accompanied by increased spiking variability.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Inhibitory activity was consistently lower in chABC-treated rats compared with controls across brain states and stimulus-evoked/spontaneous activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Evidence to support the facilitation of PV+ neuron activity by PNNs has largely been absent.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingcitation
Five days of eye closure in chABC-treated rats was sufficient to produce a shift in ODI in favor of the nondeprived eye similar to that of juvenile animals.
“Five days of eye closure in chABC-treated rats was sufficient to produce a shift in ODI in favor of the nondeprived eye similar to that of juvenile animals (Fagiolini et al., 1994;Guire et al., 1999;Deidda et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Fagiolini et al., 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Guire et al., 1999 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Deidda et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Units from CP aged rats showed similar variability in spiking activity to units from chABC-treated rats.
“Coefficient of variation of unit spiking activity was similar between juvenile and adult chABC-treated animals ( p ϭ 0.68, chABC vs p25, Mann-Whitney U test).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
chABC-treated rats showed a significant shift in ocular dominance index in favor of the open ipsilateral eye.
“whereas the chABCtreated rats showed a significant shift in ODI in favor of the open (ipsilateral) eye (Fig. 6C; untreated control vs chABC MD p ϭ 0.0002, MD control vs MD chABC p ϭ 0.001, Student's t test).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In chABC-treated animals, units' activity in the contralateral hemisphere was significantly reduced after 12 h of MD.
“In animals treated with chABC, however, the units' activity in the contralateral hemisphere was significantly reduced after 12 h of MD (Fig. 6B, middle right, p ϭ 0.005, Mann-Whitney U test).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For putative inhibitory units, the reduction in activity due to chABC treatment was of the same magnitude for both brain states during spontaneous and stimulus-evoked activity.
“For the pIN units, the reduction in activity as a result of the chABC treatment was of the same magnitude for both brain states during spontaneous and stimulus-evoked activity (Fig. 3B, right).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
During visually evoked activity, there were no differences between groups in LFP power.
“During visually evoked activity, we found no differences between groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Monocular deprivation in chABC-treated rats induced abrupt and strong gamma oscillations at approximately 40 and 55 Hz shortly after the onset of monocular deprivation.
“MD in chABC-treated rats induced abrupt and strong oscillations ϳ40 and 55 Hz shortly after the onset of MD (Fig. 7 A, B).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“The MD in chABC-treated animals caused gamma activity at ϳ40 and 55 Hz in the LFP (peak at 54 Hz).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
Gamma oscillations in freely moving rats were very sparse and occurred only as highly nonstationary bursts of activity across several frequencies despite a simultaneous strong visual response observed in the LFP.
“In comparison, in our recordings from freely moving rats, gamma oscillations were very sparse and occurred only as highly nonstationary bursts of activity across several frequencies despite a simultaneous strong visual response observed in the LFP (Fig. 4A, left).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
During spontaneous activity, LFP power was stronger in chABC-treated animals in the theta (7-10 Hz) and low-gamma (30-40 Hz) ranges.
“we found stronger LFP power in chABC-treated animals both in the theta (7-10 Hz) and low-gamma (30 -40 Hz) ranges during periods of spontaneous activity (400 ms before and until stimulus onset; Fig. 4C, 7-10 Hz: p ϭ 0.002, and 30 -40 Hz: p ϭ 0.001, Student's t test).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In chABC-treated animals, units ipsilateral to the deprived eye were potentiated after 24 h.
“In chABC-treated animals, units contralateral to the deprived eye showed a significant reduction in activity after 12 h ( p ϭ 0.005), whereas units ipsilateral to the deprived eye were potentiated after 24 h ( p ϭ 0.03).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Putative excitatory units were not significantly different between chABC-treated and control groups.
“Putative excitatory units were not significantly different between groups (right, p ϭ 0.054, n ϭ 102 for control, n ϭ 83 for chABC).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Spiking variability, measured by the coefficient of variation of interspike interval times, was significantly higher in chABC-treated rats both for putative inhibitory and putative excitatory units.
“This was accompanied by changes in spiking variability, measured by the coefficient of variation of interspike interval times, which was significantly higher in chABC-treated rats both for pIN ( p ϭ 0.02) and pEX units ( p ϭ 0.002) (Fig. 2C, Mann-Whitney U test).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
chABC-treated animals had significantly higher theta power during spontaneous activity.
“The chABC-treated animals had significantly higher power in the low-gamma range during spontaneous activity, accompanied by higher theta power, indicating that the basic network function may be altered.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In control animals that did not undergo MD, units' response patterns and activity levels were highly stable across several sessions.
“In control animals that did not undergo MD, the units' response patterns and activity levels were highly stable across several sessions (Fig. 6B, left).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The gamma activity was highly synchronized between the two hemispheres.
“The gamma activity was highly synchronized between the two hemispheres (Fig. 7C).”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“The gamma activity in the LFP induced by MD was highly synchronized between the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres, as indicated by a large increase in coherency in the LFP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
In controls that underwent MD, units recorded in the contralateral hemisphere to the closed eye showed a nonsignificant potentiation of activity from immediately after MD start to 12 h later.
“In controls that underwent MD, units recorded in the contralateral hemisphere to the closed eye showed a nonsignificant potentiation of activity from immediately after MD start to 12 h later ( p ϭ 0.06, Mann-Whitney U test).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In control MD animals, median firing rate returned to baseline at 48 h.
“The median firing rate returned to baseline at 48 h.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
After 5 d of monocular deprivation, responses to visual stimulation did not shift in control animals.
“After 5 d of MD, responses to visual stimulation shifted toward the ipsilateral (open) eye in chABC-treated animals, but not in control animals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Without PNNs, inhibitory activity was reduced.
“Without PNNs, inhibitory activity was reduced”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The increase in spiking variability with decreased inhibitory efficacy held for networks of both excitatory and inhibitory neurons.
“The changes in variability were true for networks of both excitatory and inhibitory neurons (Fig. 5, left and right, respectively).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In control animals, activity of the units was stable over time.
“In control animals, activity of the units was stable over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was no effect on ocular dominance index in adult control rats.
“We found no effect on ODI in adult control rats”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Activity of putative excitatory units was not different between groups in either brain state.
“The activity of pEX units was not different between groups in either state, but there was a tendency for lower activity in units isolated from chABC-treated animals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Adjusting inhibitory synaptic efficacy alone was sufficient to cause increased spiking variability in simulation.
“Adjusting inhibitory synaptic efficacy alone was sufficient to cause increased spiking variability (Fig. 5), supporting the hypothesis that the level of inhibition is indicative of network maturation state and that the PNNs may stabilize the network and limit plasticity.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“In both populations, the coefficient of variation increases with reduced inhibitory strength.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
In PNN-depleted adults as well as in juveniles, MD caused an immediate potentiation of gamma activity.
“Furthermore, in PNN-depleted adults as well as in juveniles, MD caused an immediate potentiation of gamma activity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In chABC-treated animals, units contralateral to the deprived eye showed a significant reduction in activity after 12 h.
“In chABC-treated animals, units contralateral to the deprived eye showed a significant reduction in activity after 12 h ( p ϭ 0.005), whereas units ipsilateral to the deprived eye were potentiated after 24 h ( p ϭ 0.03).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Control animals that underwent monocular deprivation displayed no increase in gamma oscillations.
“In contrast, control animals that underwent MD displayed no increase in gamma oscillations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the Brunel network simulation, spiking variability increases as inhibitory synaptic efficacy decreases.
“We found that spiking variability increases as inhibitory efficacy decreases (Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mean activity of putative excitatory units was unaffected by chABC treatment.
“whereas the mean activity of putative excitatory (pEX) units was unaffected by the treatment (Fig. 2B, p ϭ 0.054, Mann-Whitney U test).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
During visual stimulation, there were no differences in LFP oscillations between chABC-treated and control groups.
“During visual stimulation, however, we found no differences between groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
chABC-treated animals had significantly higher power in the low-gamma range during spontaneous activity.
“The chABC-treated animals had significantly higher power in the low-gamma range during spontaneous activity, accompanied by higher theta power, indicating that the basic network function may be altered.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After 5 d of monocular deprivation, responses to visual stimulation shifted toward the ipsilateral (open) eye in chABC-treated animals.
“After 5 d of MD, responses to visual stimulation shifted toward the ipsilateral (open) eye in chABC-treated animals, but not in control animals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
As inhibitory activity reaches a plateau, the window for plasticity closes.
“As the inhibitory activity reaches a plateau, the window for plasticity closes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Perineuronal nets (PNNs) are extracellular matrix structures mainly enwrapping parvalbumin-expressing inhibitory neurons.
“the perineuronal nets (PNNs), which are formed mainly around the PVϩ neurons (Hockfield et al., 1990;Pizzorusso et al., 2002;Balmer et al., 2009;Carulli et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hockfield et al., 1990
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pizzorusso et al., 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Balmer et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premiseown data
Removal of PNNs in adults reopens for plasticity.
“whereas removal of PNNs in adults reopens for plasticity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
PNNs may modulate the network's excitatory-inhibitory balance.
“Although the exact functions of the PNNs are not known, they may modulate the network's excitatory-inhibitory balance as several lines of evidence point to a regulatory role for PNNs in maintaining the high-activity state of PVϩ neurons (Beurdeley et al., 2012;Cabungcal et al., 2013;Donato et al., 2013;Liu et al., 2013;Morawski et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Beurdeley et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cabungcal et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Donato et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Enzymatic breakdown of PNNs by chondroitinase ABC in adult rodents induces juvenilelike plasticity in several brain regions, including ocular dominance plasticity in visual cortex.
“Enzymatic breakdown of PNNs by use of the bacterial enzyme chondroitinase ABC (chABC) in adult rodents induces juvenilelike plasticity in several brain regions, including OD plasticity in visual cortex, demonstrating a role for PNNs in restricting adult brain plasticity (Pizzorusso et al., 2002;Gogolla et al., 2009;Carulli et al., 2010;Happel et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Pizzorusso et al., 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gogolla et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Carulli et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The immediate potentiation of gamma activity suggests a novel mechanism initiating activity-dependent plasticity and driving the rapid changes in unit activity.
“suggesting a novel mechanism initiating activity-dependent plasticity and driving the rapid changes in unit activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
PNN removal alters the balance between inhibitory and excitatory spiking activity directly.
“we demonstrate that PNN removal alters the balance between inhibitory and excitatory spiking activity directly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The changes in unit responses are triggered by synchronous activity of parvalbumin-positive neurons in response to imbalanced visual input.
“suggesting that the changes are triggered by synchronous activity of PVϩ neurons in response to the imbalanced visual input.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Alteration of the inhibitory tone may be one of the mechanisms by which PNNs contribute to regulate plasticity.
“Alteration of the inhibitory tone may be one of the mechanisms by which the PNNs contribute to regulate plasticity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
MD after PNN removal first induces a shift in activity in the contralateral hemisphere and later in the ipsilateral hemisphere.
“Therefore, our data show that MD after PNN removal first induces a shift in activity in the contralateral hemisphere and later in the ipsilateral hemisphere.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Few studies have investigated how the neuronal network responds to monocular deprivation across time using serial recordings in chronically instrumented animals.
“few studies have investigated how the neuronal network responds to MD across time using serial recordings in chronically instrumented animals (Mioche and Singer, 1989;Frenkel and Bear, 2004;Hengen et al., 2013;Rose et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Mioche and Singer, 1989
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Frenkel and Bear, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hengen et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Synchronized gamma activity is strongly correlated with learning in the highly plastic hippocampus.
“Supporting this hypothesis is the finding that synchronized gamma activity is strongly correlated with learning in the highly plastic hippocampus (Igarashi et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Igarashi et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The level of inhibition is indicative of network maturation state.
“Adjusting inhibitory synaptic efficacy alone was sufficient to cause increased spiking variability (Fig. 5), supporting the hypothesis that the level of inhibition is indicative of network maturation state and that the PNNs may stabilize the network and limit plasticity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
PNN removal opens for plasticity by similar mechanisms to those of ocular dominance plasticity during the critical period.
“We provide evidence indicating that PNN removal opens for plasticity by similar mechanisms to those of OD plasticity during the CP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Mismatch in input from the eyes at the start of monocular deprivation may activate ensembles of these cells in a highly synchronous manner, giving rise to strong gamma oscillations driving plasticity processes.
“Similarly, mismatch in input from the eyes at the start of MD may activate ensembles of these cells in a highly synchronous manner, giving rise to strong gamma oscillations driving plasticity processes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This further supports that the network state in adult rats after PNN removal may be similar to the network function of CP aged rats.
“This further supports that the network state in adult rats after PNN removal may be similar to the network function of CP aged rats.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The functional role of PNNs in this process may be to restrict the PV+ network and thereby restrict plasticity.
“The functional role of PNNs in this process may be to restrict the PVϩ network and thereby restrict plasticity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Global knockout of the link protein Ctrl-1 demonstrated that the PNN is the part of extracellular matrix responsible for plasticity regulation.
“Although chABC is not selective to matrix components in PNNs, global knockout of the link protein Ctrl-1, an essential component of PNNs, demonstrated that the PNN is the part of extracellular matrix responsible for plasticity regulation (Carulli et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carulli et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Increased gamma activity shortly after onset of sensory deprivation is a common feature of neural networks in a state of high plasticity.
“Moreover, it suggests that increased gamma activity shortly after the onset of sensory deprivation is a common feature of neural networks in a state of high plasticity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The novel observation suggests that an immediate increase in the synchrony of PV+ activity occurs after monocular deprivation, but only in a network with high plasticity.
“This novel observation suggests that an immediate increase in the synchrony of PVϩ activity occurs after MD, but only in a network with high plasticity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Maturation of the inhibitory network, in particular the PV+ inhibitory neurons, is likely the main contributor to the reduction in plasticity during adolescence.
“Maturation of the inhibitory network, in particular the PVϩ inhibitory neurons, is likely the main contributor to the reduction in plasticity during adolescence (for review, see Hensch, 2005;Levelt and Hu ¨bener, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hensch, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Levelt and Hübener, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
PNN removal had little or no effect on response properties of excitatory neurons such as orientation tuning and visual acuity.
“The latter is consistent with previous work demonstrating that PNN removal had little or no effect on response properties of excitatory neurons such as orientation tuning and visual acuity (Pizzorusso et al., 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pizzorusso et al., 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Recordings to assess ocular dominance index in head-fixed, awake animals give highly comparable results to those performed in anesthesia.
“However, recordings to assess ODI in head-fixed, awake animals give highly comparable results to those performed in anesthesia (Frenkel and Bear, 2004;Rose et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Frenkel and Bear, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rose et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 28
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 32
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter chABC treatment, WFA intensity gradually increased, reaching 30% after 14 d and almost 90% after 60 d.
“a gradual increase in WFA intensity was observed, reaching 30% after 14 d and almost 90% after 60 d (Fig. 1D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationMost PNNs in V1 overlap with PV-expressing neurons.
“As described previously (Ha ¨rtig et al., 1992), most of the PNNs in V1 overlap with PV-expressing neurons (Fig. 1A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ha ¨rtig et al., 1992
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataApproximately 20% of both control and chABC-treated populations were characterized as narrow-spiking putative inhibitory units.
“Approximately 20% of both the control and chABC-treated populations were characterized as narrow-spiking, putative inhibitory (pIN) units (Fig. 2A, green), matching the distribution found in the neocortex in general (Markram et al., 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Markram et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThese high-frequency oscillations were abundant in all chABC-treated rats that underwent monocular deprivation, but disappeared gradually about 1 h after eye closure.
“These high-frequency oscillations were abundant in all chABC-treated rats that underwent MD, but disappeared gradually ϳ1 h after the eye closure (52-65 Hz, repeatedmeasures ANOVA, F ϭ 8.69, p ϭ 0.01 and 35-48 Hz, F ϭ 10.13, p ϭ 0.01).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn chABC-treated animals, ipsilateral unit activity showed no change at 12 h after MD start, but showed a significant increase in activity after 24 h.
“The ipsilateral unit activity showed no change at 12 h after MD start, but showed a significant increase in activity after 24 h (Fig. 6B, far right, p ϭ 0.03, Mann-Whitney U test).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataBoth groups of animals had sparse gamma oscillations compared with previous recordings from head-fixed mice.
“We found that both groups of animals had sparse gamma oscillations compared with previous recordings from head-fixed mice (Niell and Stryker, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Niell and Stryker, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataWithout PNNs, spiking variability was increased.
“whereas spiking variability was increased as predicted in a simulation with a Brunel neural network.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe responsiveness to visual stimulation was low overall compared with previous findings in rodents.
“Compared with previous findings in rodents, the responsiveness to visual stimulation was low overall (Girman et al., 1999;Niell andStryker, 2008, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Girman et al., 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Niell andStryker, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Niell andStryker, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA pronounced and immediate increase in gamma activity was followed by changes in unit responses in the first 12-24 h.
“A pronounced and immediate increase in gamma activity was followed by changes in unit responses in the first 12-24 h”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn control animals after monocular deprivation, there was a nonsignificant potentiation of activity after 12 h, which returned to baseline activity after 48 h.
“In control animals after MD, there was a nonsignificant potentiation of activity after 12 h ( p ϭ 0.06), which went back to baseline activity after 48 h.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe LFP effects were observed both in the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres to the closed eye, although they were strongest in the contralateral side.
“The LFP effects were observed both in the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres to the closed eye, although they were strongest in the contralateral side.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTime periods with gamma oscillations (gamma events) were not different in chABC-treated animals, neither events per unit time nor gamma event power.
“Time periods with gamma oscillations (gamma events) were not different in chABC-treated animals, neither events per unit time nor gamma event power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOur data from chronically recorded single units are similar to previous work on CP aged animals looking at population activity alone, but the changes in activity occur earlier in our data.
“Together, our data from chronically recorded single units are similar to previous work on CP aged animals looking at population activity alone, but the changes in activity occur earlier in our data (Frenkel and Bear, 2004;Gandhi et al., 2008; but see Kuhlman et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Frenkel and Bear, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gandhi et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kuhlman et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenThe assembly of PNNs coincides with the end of the period of heightened visual cortex plasticity in juveniles.
“The assembly of PNNs coincides with the end of the period of heightened visual cortex plasticity in juveniles”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe time window for heightened activity-dependent plasticity, or critical period, is limited and depends on maturation of inhibitory neurons after eye opening, in particular maturation of GABAergic fast-spiking parvalbumin-positive inhibitory neurons and their network integration.
“The time window for heightened activity-dependent plasticity, or critical period (CP), is limited and depends on the maturation of inhibitory neurons after eye opening, in particular the maturation of the GABAergic fast-spiking parvalbumin (PVϩ) inhibitory neurons and their network integration (Fagiolini and Hensch, 2000;Fagiolini et al., 2004;Hensch, 2005;Southwell et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Fagiolini and Hensch, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Fagiolini et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hensch, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataPNN removal in adults resets the neuronal network to an immature, juvenile state with reduced inhibitory activity and high spiking variability similar to that of the critical period.
“we show for the first time that PNN removal in adults resets the neuronal network to an immature state with reduced inhibitory activity and high spiking variability similar to that of the CP.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“we show that PNN removal resets the neural network to an immature, juvenile state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationParvalbumin-positive inhibitory neuron maturation suppresses spontaneous activity of excitatory neurons, thereby promoting visually evoked activity after eye opening.
“Recent work suggests that the PVϩ inhibitory neuron maturation suppresses spontaneous activity of excitatory neurons, thereby promoting visually evoked activity after eye opening (Toyoizumi et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Toyoizumi et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductreasoningBeyond 48 h after MD, it became difficult to confirm the identity of the neurons, so those data were excluded from analysis.
“Beyond this point, it became difficult to confirm the identity of the neurons; these data were therefore excluded from analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataSpike sorting separation quality was assessed using autocorrelation and cross-correlation, Mahalanobis distance, and visual inspection, and approximately 30% of recorded units were left out of the analysis.
“Separation quality was assessed further using the Mahalanobis distance and by visual inspection.On this basis, ϳ30% of recorded units were left out of the analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationBrain state was quantified based on the method used by Wang et al. (2013).
“Brain state was quantified based on the method used by Wang et al. (2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al. (2013)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationPutative excitatory neurons were distinguished from putative inhibitory neurons based on characteristics of their mean waveform.
“Putative excitatory neurons were distinguished from putative inhibitory neurons based on characteristics of their mean waveform, as recorded by the electrode in which the amplitude was largest (Bruno and Simons, 2002;Bartho ´et al., 2004;Niell and Stryker, 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bruno and Simons, 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bartho ´et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Niell and Stryker, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll data were tested for normality before analysis by Shapiro-Wilk test and statistical testing was performed accordingly.
“All data were tested for normality before analysis (by Shapiro-Wilk test) and statistical testing was performed accordingly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Brunel model has become established as a canonical model for the description of spontaneous cortical activity because it captures many essential features observed in experiments, such as asynchronous irregular spiking activity.
“This model has become established as a canonical model for the description of spontaneous cortical activity because it captures many essential features observed in experiments; for example, asynchronous irregular spiking activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brunel, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe LFP recordings were consistent with the single unit responses in that chABC treatment changed the baseline state of the neuronal network, but not the processing of visual stimuli.
“Therefore, the LFP recordings were consistent with the single unit responses in that the chABC treatment changed the baseline state of the neuronal network, but not the processing of visual stimuli.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataElectrophysiological recordings were conducted in V1 as verified by postmortem histochemistry to confirm electrode position.
“All electrophysiological recordings were conducted in the V1 as verified by postmortem histochemistry to confirm electrode position (Fig. 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe state shift of the network toward a more irregular state is consistent with in vivo findings and supports that chABC treatment may cause a shift in the excitatory-inhibitory balance, correlating with changes in spiking variability and spiking activity.
“This state shift of the network toward a more irregular state is consistent with our in vivo findings and supports that chABC treatment may cause a shift in the excitatory-inhibitory balance, correlating with changes in spiking variability and spiking activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll experimentation was approved by the Norwegian Animal Research Committee before initiation.
“All experimentation was approved by the Norwegian Animal Research Committee before initiation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationGamma events were detected using the method described in Colgin et al. (2009).
“Gamma events were detected using the method described in Colgin et al. (2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Colgin et al. (2009)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe ocular dominance index findings are consistent with previous work.
“These findings are consistent with previous work (Pizzorusso et al., 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pizzorusso et al., 2002
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationHigh-frequency gamma oscillations (30-80 Hz) are likely due to highly synchronized activity in parvalbumin-positive cells.
“The high-frequent gamma oscillations (30 -80 Hz) are likely due to highly synchronized activity in the PVϩ cells (Cardin et al., 2009)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cardin et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPNNs may stabilize the network and limit plasticity.
“Adjusting inhibitory synaptic efficacy alone was sufficient to cause increased spiking variability (Fig. 5), supporting the hypothesis that the level of inhibition is indicative of network maturation state and that the PNNs may stabilize the network and limit plasticity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationOscillations in the gamma-frequency range result from synchronized activity of PV+ neurons.
“Oscillations in the gamma-frequency range result from synchronized activity of PVϩ neurons (Cardin et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cardin et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGamma oscillations have been correlated with sensory stimulation in anesthetized animals, locomotion, attention, and memory load.
“Gamma oscillations have been correlated with sensory stimulation in anesthetized animals, locomotion, attention, and memory load (Niell andStryker, 2008, 2010;Igarashi et al., 2014;Pritchett et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Niell and Stryker, 2008, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Igarashi et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pritchett et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnesthesia is known to affect correlated activity and the activity of both inhibitory and excitatory units.
“Anesthesia is known to affect correlated activity and the activity of both inhibitory and excitatory units (Vizuete et al., 2012;Goltstein et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Vizuete et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Goltstein et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataRemoval of PNNs leads to reduced inhibitory activity, with only minor effects on basic information processing by the network.
“Our data suggest that removal of PNNs leads to reduced inhibitory activity, with only minor effects on basic information processing by the network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Evidence to support the facilitation of PV+ neuron activity by PNNs has largely been absent.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationReduced inhibitory activity after PNN removal may be of relevance for several neurological diseases in which dysfunction of inhibitory PV+ neurons have been implicated, most notably schizophrenia.
“Furthermore, reduced inhibitory activity after PNN removal may be of relevance for several neurological diseases in which dysfunction of inhibitory PVϩ neurons have been implicated, most notably schizophrenia (Lewis et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lewis et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningWe cannot infer directly that the changes in unit activity observed during monocular deprivation in awake recordings correspond directly to recordings performed under anesthesia after monocular deprivation.
“We cannot infer directly that the changes in unit activity observed during MD in awake recordings correspond directly to recordings performed under anesthesia after MD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationStronger gamma oscillations may be expected if the animal is alert, such as during an associative learning task.
“Stronger gamma oscillations may be expected if the animal is alert, such as during an associative learning task (Igarashi et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Igarashi et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPostmortem studies of schizophrenia patients indicate that PNNs are depleted.
“Interestingly, postmortem studies of schizophrenia patients indicate that PNNs are depleted (Berretta, 2012;Pantazopoulos et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Berretta, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pantazopoulos et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationVisual responses of neurons in visual cortex in awake and freely moving rodents have rarely been examined.
“To date, visual responses of neurons in visual cortex in awake and freely moving rodents have rarely been examined (Ji and Wilson, 2007;Toyoizumi et al., 2013;Haggerty and Ji, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ji and Wilson, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Toyoizumi et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Haggerty and Ji, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe effect of anesthesia on spiking activity is stronger during spontaneous activity compared with stimulus-evoked firing, for which behavioral state has a stronger impact.
“However, the effect of anesthesia on spiking activity is stronger during spontaneous activity compared with stimulus-evoked firing, for which behavioral state has a stronger impact (Niell and Stryker, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Niell and Stryker, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe difference in gamma oscillations could be due to differences in the experimental setup or differences between species.
“The difference could be due to differences in the experimental setup or differences between species (Buzsa ´ki et al., 2003;Niell and Stryker, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Buzsáki et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Niell and Stryker, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe high activity of mature PV+ neurons may be facilitated by PNNs by providing a favorable extracellular environment, protection against oxidative stress after high metabolic demands, and capture of Otx2.
“The high activity of mature PVϩ neurons may be facilitated by the PNNs by providing a favorable extracellular environment (Bru ¨ckner et al., 1993;Ha ¨rtig et al., 1999;Morawski et al., 2015), protection against oxidative stress after the high metabolic demands (Cabungcal et al., 2013), and capture of Otx2 (Beurdeley et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Brückner et al., 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Härtig et al., 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Morawski et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCompared with in vivo data from adult rats and in silico data from the Brunel model, this points to similar network states between CP aged animals and the chABC-treated group, in which reduced inhibitory activity may cause increased spiking variability.
“Compared with our in vivo data from adult rats and the in silico data from the Brunel model (Fig. 5), this points to similar network states between the CP aged animals and the chABC-treated group, in which reduced inhibitory activity may cause increased spiking variability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationA similar trend was observed in juvenile rats, in which inhibition is lower than in adults, suggesting a common feature of an immature network state.
“A similar trend was observed in juvenile rats, in which inhibition is lower than in adults, suggesting a common feature of an immature network state (Hensch et al., 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hensch et al., 1998
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThis is one of very few investigations to monitor the activity of the same units in the binocular region of V1 during ocular dominance plasticity.
“This is one of very few investigations to monitor the activity of the same units in the binocular region of V1 during OD plasticity (Mioche and Singer, 1989;Rose et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mioche and Singer, 1989
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rose et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The most prominent plasticity changes during ocular dominance plasticity occur in the binocular part of V1.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataA similar effect was seen with monocular deprivation in CP aged animals, suggesting that this may be a common feature of circuits of high plasticity when load is placed on the network, such as during the initial phase of sensory deprivation.
“A similar effect was seen with MD in CP aged animals (Fig. 8), suggesting that this may be a common feature of circuits of high plasticity when load is placed on the network, such as during the initial phase of sensory deprivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe neuronal circuitry of the juvenile brain is likely different from resetting the circuitry of adult brain, likely also affecting the mechanisms of ocular dominance plasticity.
“However, the neuronal circuitry of the juvenile brain is likely different from resetting the circuitry of adult brain, likely also affecting the mechanisms of OD plasticity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe use of chronically implanted tetrodes enabled recordings in awake rats without movement restraint and monitoring the activity of the very same neurons across several sessions.
“The use of chronically implanted tetrodes enabled recordings in awake rats without movement restraint and monitoring the activity of the very same neurons across several sessions, bringing novel insight into the mechanisms of OD plasticity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe small peak at 50 Hz reflects local line noise and is not biological activity, and was filtered out for power analysis.
“The small peak at 50 Hz reflects local line noise and is not biological activity (filtered out for power analysis).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe underlying mechanisms and time course of events of ocular dominance plasticity remain unresolved.
“Although OD plasticity has been the canonical model to study activity-dependent plasticity for decades, the underlying mechanisms and time course of events remain unresolved (Kuhlman et al., 2013;Cooke and Bear, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kuhlman et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cooke and Bear, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
The mechanisms by which PNN removal allows increased plasticity remain elusive.
“The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain elusive.”
“Nevertheless, how the removal of PNNs allows for increased plasticity remains elusive.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Evidence to support the facilitation of PV+ neuron activity by PNNs has largely been absent.
“However, evidence to support this facilitation has largely been absent.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The most prominent plasticity changes during ocular dominance plasticity occur in the binocular part of V1.
“Whereas Hengen et al. (2013) conducted a similar experiment, they recorded from the monocular part of V1 and the most prominent plasticity changes during OD plasticity occur in the binocular part.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Digestion of CSPGs in the primary visual cortex in rats or deletion of aggrecan in mice decreases inhibitory activity, causing the network to revert to an immature juvenile state and an increased level of activity-dependent plasticity.
“In line with this, digestion of CSPGs in the primary visual cortex in rats or deletion of aggrecan in mice decreases inhibitory activity, causing the network to revert to an immature juvenile state and an increased level of activity-dependent plasticity [47, 69].”
From The extracellular matrix and perineuronal nets in memory (2022) · cites this paper as [47]
The Results and Discussion (page numbers unavailable) report that chondroitinase treatment in rat primary visual cortex reduced inhibitory activity and restored juvenile-like ocular-dominance plasticity. The paper does not report aggrecan deletion in mice, so it supports the rat portion of the sentence but not the mouse portion. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the entorhinal cortex, ChABC reduces inhibitory inputs.
“while in the entorhinal cortex, ChABC reduces inhibitory inputs”
From The extracellular matrix and perineuronal nets in memory (2022) · cites this paper as [47]
The Results report lower firing activity in putative inhibitory neurons after chABC treatment, but all electrophysiological recordings were in primary visual cortex (V1), not the entorhinal cortex. The paper measures inhibitory-neuron activity rather than directly measuring inhibitory inputs (Results; page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn V1 visual cortex, ChABC decreases both excitatory and inhibitory inputs to PV interneurons.
“and in V1 visual cortex, ChABC decreases both excitatory and inhibitory inputs to PV interneurons [46, 47].”
From The extracellular matrix and perineuronal nets in memory (2022) · cites this paper as [47]
The Results (page unavailable) report that chABC lowered the firing activity of putative inhibitory neurons in V1, while putative excitatory neuron activity was unaffected. Firing activity does not establish whether excitatory or inhibitory synaptic inputs to PV interneurons decreased. Searches for those inputs and synaptic currents found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredchABC-mediated removal of chondroitin sulfate side chains from PNNs reduced spiking of PV cells in adult rats and increased spiking variability.
“While this mechanism has not been confirmed, chABC-mediated removal of chondroitin sulfate side chains from PNNs reduced spiking of PV cells in adult rats (Balmer, 2016; Lensjø et al., 2017) and increased spiking variability (Lensjø et al., 2017).”
From The Perineuronal ‘Safety’ Net? Perineuronal Net Abnormalities in Neurological Disorders (2018) · cites this paper as Lensjø et al., 2017
As PNNs regulate PV cell activity and protect PV cells from oxidative stress, PNNs can be potentially targeted to control seizures.
“As PNNs regulate PV cell activity (Balmer, 2016; Lensjø et al., 2017) and protect PV cells from oxidative stress (Cabungcal et al., 2013), PNNs can be potentially targeted to control seizures.”
From The Perineuronal ‘Safety’ Net? Perineuronal Net Abnormalities in Neurological Disorders (2018) · cites this paper as Lensjø et al., 2017
The time course of plasticity induced by LRx may be determined by regrowth of the ECM.
“The time course of the plasticity induced by LRx may be determined by regrowth of the ECM, which mirrors the reformation of the mature ECM observed after enzymatic degradation (Lensjø et al., 2017; Romberg et al., 2013).”
From Light reintroduction after dark exposure reactivates plasticity in adults via perisynaptic activation of MMP-9 (2017) · cites this paper as Lensjø et al., 2017
PNN degradation reduces PV+ interneuron activity.
“PNN degradation has been shown to reduce PV+ interneuron activity (29)”
From Perineuronal nets, inhibitory interneurons and anxiety-related ventral hippocampal neuronal oscillations are altered by early life adversity (2019) · cites this paper as [29]
PNN degradation reduces PV+ interneuron activity and alters gamma and theta range neuronal oscillations in rats.
“PNN degradation also reduces PV+ interneuron activity and alters gamma and theta range neuronal oscillations in rats (29).”
From Perineuronal nets, inhibitory interneurons and anxiety-related ventral hippocampal neuronal oscillations are altered by early life adversity (2019) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
chABC inhibitory-unit percentage does not match its count
MinorTwenty-two of 105 units is 20.95%, which rounds to 21%, not the reported 22%.
Reported 22 · recomputed 20.952381
“22%, 22 out of 105 units”
Two incompatible spike-waveform sampling specifications
MinorThe electrophysiology methods give both 48 kHz with 50 samples per waveform and 32 kHz for 1 ms for stored spike waveforms. Those specifications cannot both describe the same waveform acquisition.
“Triggered spikes were stored to disk at 48 kHz (50 samples per waveform, 8 bits/sample) with a 32-bit time stamp (clock rate at 96 kHz).”
“Spike waveforms above a threshold of 50 V were time stamped, digitized at 32 kHz for 1 ms, and saved to the hard drive for offline analysis.”
Control inhibitory-unit percentage does not match its count
MinorTwenty of 122 units is 16.39%, which rounds to 16%, not the reported 17%.
Reported 17 · recomputed 16.393443
“17%, 20 of 122”
Control-animal count differs for the same 122-unit group
MinorThe methods say the 122 control units came from three animals, but the results describe the control group as four rats. The reported 20 inhibitory and 102 excitatory control units sum to those same 122 units.
“122 units from three control animals”
“control animals (4 rats, 20 units; Fig. 2B, p ϭ 0.0009, Mann-Whitney U test)”
Brain-state analysis uses different upper frequency limits
MinorThe methods define the high-frequency band used for brain-state classification as 30-70 Hz, while the Figure 3 legend defines it as 30-80 Hz.
“30 -70 Hz (high-frequency, desynchronized)”
“Brain state was classified as synchronized or desynchronized based on the ratio between the LFP power of slow (1-10 Hz) and fast (30 -80 Hz) oscillations.”
Cites
Interneurons of the neocortical inhibitory system
Markram, H., Toledo-Rodriguez, M., Wang, Y., Gupta, A., Silberberg, G., & Wu, C. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1519 · Cited by 2,954 · see citing works
Reactivation of Ocular Dominance Plasticity in the Adult Visual Cortex
Pizzorusso, T., Medini, P., Berardi, N., Chierzi, S., Fawcett, J. W., & Maffei, L. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1072699 · Cited by 1,679 · see citing works
Modulation of visual responses by behavioral state in mouse visual cortex
Niell, C. M., & Stryker, M. P. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.033 · Cited by 1,483 · see citing works
Perineuronal Nets Protect Fear Memories from Erasure
Gogolla, N., Caroni, P., Lüthi, A., & Herry, C. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1174146 · Cited by 760 · see citing works
Perineuronal nets protect fast-spiking interneurons against oxidative stress
Cabungcal, J.-H., Steullet, P., Morishita, H., Kraftsik, R., Cuenod, M., Hensch, T. K., & Do, K. Q. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1300454110 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
A disinhibitory microcircuit initiates critical-period plasticity in the visual cortex
Kuhlman, S. J., Olivas, N. D., Tring, E., Ikrar, T., Xu, X., & Trachtenberg, J. T. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12485 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Otx2 Binding to Perineuronal Nets Persistently Regulates Plasticity in the Mature Visual Cortex
Beurdeley, M., Spatazza, J., Lee, H. H. C., Sugiyama, S., Bernard, C., Di Nardo, A. A., Hensch, T. K., & Prochiantz, A. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0394-12.2012 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Brückner, G., Brauer, K., Härtig, W., Wolff, J. R., Rickmann, M. J., Derouiche, A., Delpech, B., Girard, N., Oertel, W. H., & Reichenbach, A. (1993) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.440080306 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Hockfield, S., Kalb, R. G., Zaremba, S., & Fryer, H. (1990) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1990.055.01.049 · Cited by 271 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This coincides with the assembly of stable extracellular matrix structures, the perineuronal nets (PNNs), which are formed mainly around the PV neurons (Hockfield et al., 1990; Pizzorusso et al., 2002; Balmer et al., 2009; Carulli et al., 2010).”
BackgroundCortical Plasticity Induced by Inhibitory Neuron Transplantation
Southwell, D. G., Froemke, R. C., Alvarez-Buylla, A., Stryker, M. P., & Gandhi, S. P. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1183962 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Modulation of Perineuronal Nets and Parvalbumin with Developmental Song Learning
Balmer, T. S., Carels, V. M., Frisch, J. L., & Nick, T. A. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2974-09.2009 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Happel, M. F. K., Niekisch, H., Castiblanco Rivera, L. L., Ohl, F. W., Deliano, M., & Frischknecht, R. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1310272111 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Brückner, G., Bringmann, A., Härtig, W., Köppe, G., Delpech, B., & Brauer, K. (1998) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s002210050463 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Early depolarizing GABA controls critical-period plasticity in the rat visual cortex
Deidda, G., Allegra, M., Cerri, C., Naskar, S., Bony, G., Zunino, G., Bozzi, Y., Caleo, M., & Cancedda, L. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3890 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Guire, E. S., Lickey, M. E., & Gordon, B. (1999) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1999.81.1.121 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- 10.1152/jn.01170.2003 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2262-11.2011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.08.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1163/156856897X00357 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1008925309027 · DOI
- Bruno, 2002, Feedforward mechanisms of excitatory and inhibitory cortical receptive fields, J Neurosci, 22, 10966, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-24-10966.2002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00669-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature08002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/brain/awq145 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/srep17847 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08573 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2013.0284 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncb3274 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature12866 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/35004582 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90210-0 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1091032 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0806159105 · DOI
- 10.4249/scholarpedia.1430 · DOI
- Sauvé, 1999, Receptive field properties of single neurons in rat primary visual cortex, J Neurophysiol, 82, 301, 10.1152/jn.1999.82.1.301 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0118277 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.08902 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001756-199210000-00012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0006-8993(99)01784-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.08.038 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrn1787 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.282.5393.1504 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature13162 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn1825 · DOI · Paper page
- Kwok, 2008, Proteoglycans in the central nervous system: plasticity, regeneration and their stimulation with Chondroitinase ABC, Restor Neurol Neurosci, 26, 131
- 10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113813 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tins.2011.10.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.02.02 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2951-11.2011 · DOI
- Mioche, 1989, Chronic recordings from single sites of kitten striate cortex during experience-dependent modifications of receptive-field properties, J Neurophysiol, 62, 185, 10.1152/jn.1989.62.1.185 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep16471 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0623-08.2008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/tp.2014.128 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.conb.2015.02.004 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aad3358 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature07991 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fnint.2012.00090 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature12153 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1316166111 · DOI
- Wiesel, 1963, Single-cell responses in striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision in one eye, J Neurophysiol, 26, 1003, 10.1152/jn.1963.26.6.1003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4969-13.2014 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Perineuronal nets stabilize the grid cell network
Christensen, A. C., Lensjø, K. K., Lepperød, M. E., Dragly, S.-A., Sutterud, H., Blackstad, J. S., Fyhn, M., & Hafting, T. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20241-w · Cited by 1,865 · see citing works
Self-citationThe roles of perineuronal nets and the perinodal extracellular matrix in neuronal function
Fawcett, J. W., Oohashi, T., & Pizzorusso, T. (2019) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0196-3 · Cited by 589 · see citing works
Critical period regulation across multiple timescales
Reh, R. K., Dias, B. G., Nelson, C. A., Kaufer, D., Werker, J. F., Kolb, B., Levine, J. D., & Hensch, T. K. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1820836117 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Adult neurogenesis, glia, and the extracellular matrix
Cope, E. C., & Gould, E. (2019) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2019.03.023 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Page, C. E., & Coutellier, L. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.024 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Aggrecan Directs Extracellular Matrix-Mediated Neuronal Plasticity
Rowlands, D., Lensjø, K. K., Dinh, T., Yang, S., Andrews, M. R., Hafting, T., Fyhn, M., Fawcett, J. W., & Dick, G. (2018) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1122-18.2018 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Self-citationThe extracellular matrix and perineuronal nets in memory
Fawcett, J. W., Fyhn, M., Jendelova, P., Kwok, J. C. F., Ruzicka, J., & Sorg, B. A. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01634-3 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Perineuronal ‘Safety’ Net? Perineuronal Net Abnormalities in Neurological Disorders
Wen, T. H., Binder, D. K., Ethell, I. M., & Razak, K. A. (2018) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2018.00270 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Perineuronal Nets in the Adult Sensory Cortex Are Necessary for Fear Learning
Banerjee, S. B., Gutzeit, V. A., Baman, J., Aoued, H. S., Doshi, N. K., Liu, R. C., & Ressler, K. J. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.007 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Wen, T. H., Afroz, S., Reinhard, S. M., Palacios, A. R., Tapia, K., Binder, D. K., Razak, K. A., & Ethell, I. M. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx258 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Lensjø, K. K., Christensen, A. C., Tennøe, S., Fyhn, M., & Hafting, T. (2017) · eneuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0379-16.2017 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Self-citationWingert, J. C., & Sorg, B. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsyn.2021.673210 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Shi, W., Wei, X., Wang, X., Du, S., Liu, W., Song, J., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1902680116 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Removal of perineuronal nets disrupts recall of a remote fear memory
Thompson, E. H., Lensjø, K. K., Wigestrand, M. B., Malthe-Sørenssen, A., Hafting, T., & Fyhn, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1713530115 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationCarceller, H., Guirado, R., Ripolles-Campos, E., Teruel-Marti, V., & Nacher, J. (2020) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0291-20.2020 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Murthy, S., Kane, G. A., Katchur, N. J., Lara Mejia, P. S., Obiofuma, G., Buschman, T. J., McEwen, B. S., & Gould, E. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.02.021 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Murase, S., Lantz, C. L., & Quinlan, E. M. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.27345 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Alaiyed, S., McCann, M., Mahajan, G., Rajkowska, G., Stockmeier, C. A., Kellar, K. J., Wu, J. Y., & Conant, K. (2020) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2387-19.2020 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
iPlasticity: Induced juvenile‐like plasticity in the adult brain as a mechanism of antidepressants
Umemori, J., Winkel, F., Didio, G., Llach Pou, M., & Castrén, E. (2018) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.12683 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Chondroitin 6-sulphate is required for neuroplasticity and memory in ageing
Yang, S., Gigout, S., Molinaro, A., Naito-Matsui, Y., Hilton, S., Foscarin, S., Nieuwenhuis, B., Tan, C. L., Verhaagen, J., Pizzorusso, T., et al. (2021) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01208-9 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Rupert, D. D., & Shea, S. D. (2022) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2022.886629 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Incubation of depression: ECM assembly and parvalbumin interneurons after stress
Spijker, S., Koskinen, M.-K., & Riga, D. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.015 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Hyperexcitability and homeostasis in fragile X Syndrome.
Liu, X., Kumar, V., Tsai, N.-P., & Auerbach, B. D. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2021.805929 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Yu, Z., Chen, N., Hu, D., Chen, W., Yuan, Y., Meng, S., Zhang, W., Lu, L., Han, Y., & Shi, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2020.00004 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Winkel, F., Ryazantseva, M., Voigt, M. B., Didio, G., Lilja, A., Llach Pou, M., Steinzeig, A., Harkki, J., Englund, J., Khirug, S., et al. (2021) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01211-0 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Cope, E. C., Zych, A. D., Katchur, N. J., Waters, R. C., Laham, B. J., Diethorn, E. J., Park, C. Y., Meara, W. R., & Gould, E. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01174-2 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Juvenile stress induces behavioral change and affects perineuronal net formation in juvenile mice
Ueno, H., Suemitsu, S., Murakami, S., Kitamura, N., Wani, K., Matsumoto, Y., Okamoto, M., Aoki, S., & Ishihara, T. (2018) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/s12868-018-0442-z · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Neuronal Pentraxin 2 Binds PNNs and Enhances PNN Formation
Van’t Spijker, H. M., Rowlands, D., Rossier, J., Haenzi, B., Fawcett, J. W., & Kwok, J. C. F. (2019) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2019/6804575 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
NPY-Y1 receptor signaling controls spatial learning and perineuronal net expression
Bertocchi, I., Mele, P., Ferrero, G., Oberto, A., Carulli, D., & Eva, C. (2021) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108425 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Anderson, M. D., Paylor, J. W., Scott, G. A., Greba, Q., Winship, I. R., & Howland, J. G. (2020) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.050245.119 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lensjø, K. K., Lepperød, M. E., Dick, G., Hafting, T., & Fyhn, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2016-12-30
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1269-1283
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6596863
- OpenAlex
- W2565754955
- Semantic Scholar
- 78bd5281a531c5f34c3c651864ec011894eb4e12
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 14
- FWCI
- 11.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Universitetet i Oslo
- Norges Forskningsråd
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- perineuronal nets, visual cortex plasticity, critical period, activity-dependent plasticity, monocular deprivation, ocular dominance, gamma oscillations, inhibitory interneurons, parvalbumin, extracellular matrix, neural network dynamics, single-unit activity
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Animals, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Extracellular Matrix, Male, Nerve Net, Neuronal Plasticity, Photic Stimulation, Synapses, Visual Cortex, Vision, Monocular, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats, Electrophysiological Phenomena, Gamma Rhythm
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review