The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drosophila immunity: The Drosocin gene encodes two host defence peptides with pathogen-specific roles
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1098/rspb.2022.0773 · Paper page
Abstract
1.1 Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are key players in innate defence against infection in plants and animals. In Drosophila , many host defence peptides are produced downstream of the Toll and Imd NF-κB pathways. Use of single and compound AMP mutations in Drosophila has revealed that AMPs can additively or synergistically contribute to combat pathogens in vivo. However, these studies also revealed a high degree of specificity, wherein just one AMP can play a major role in combatting a specific pathogen. We recently uncovered a specific importance of the antibacterial peptide Drosocin for defence against Enterobacter cloacae . Here, we show that the Drosocin locus (CG10816) is more complex than previously described. In addition to its namesake peptide “Drosocin”, it encodes a second peptide generated from a precursor via furin cleavage. We name this peptide “Buletin”, and show that it corresponds to the uncharacterized “Immune-induced Molecule 7” previously identified by MALDI-TOF. The existence of a naturally occurring polymorphism (Thr52Ala) in the CG10816 precursor protein masked the identification of this peptide previously. Using mutations differently affecting the production of these two CG10816 gene products, we show that Drosocin, but not Buletin, contributes to the CG10816 -mediated defence against E. cloacae . Strikingly, we observed that Buletin, but not Drosocin, contributes to the CG10816 -mediated defence against Providencia burhodogranariea . Moreover, the Thr52Ala polymorphism in Buletin affects survival to P. burhodogranariea , wherein the Alanine allele confers better defence than the Threonine allele. However, we found no activity of Buletin against either P. burhodogranariea or E. coli in vitro. Collectively, our study reveals that CG10816 encodes not one but two prominent host defence peptides with different specificity against different pathogens. This finding emphasizes the complexity of the Drosophila humoral response consisting of multiple host defence peptides with specific activities, and demonstrates how natural polymorphisms found in Drosophila populations can affect host susceptibility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 69
- 10.1016/j.coi.2019.11.008 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aau5480 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008480 · DOI
- 10.1159/000086648 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41573-019-0058-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7554/elife.44341 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1983.tb01465.x · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2015.0297 · DOI
- 10.1038/292246a0 · DOI
- 10.1038/nri3763 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141615 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00104-9 · DOI
- 10.1038/ni922 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/21.11.2568 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14614 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.01814-06 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004876 · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.063 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009846 · DOI
- 10.1159/000489831 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0064q.x · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/iyab188 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05801.x · DOI
- 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3988 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M313608200 · DOI
- 10.1101/2021.02.24.432738 · DOI
- 10.1101/2020.11.23.394809 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.12.001 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.95.19.11342 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msg109 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biochi.2004.07.007 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi002656a · DOI
- 10.1021/bi0012843 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.peptides.2016.01.016 · DOI
- 1993, A novel inducible antibacterial peptide of Drosophila carries an O-glycosylated substitution, J Biol Chem, 268, 14893, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)82417-6 · DOI
- 2019, Adult Drosophila Lack Hematopoiesis but Rely on a Blood Cell Reservoir at the Respiratory Epithelia to Relay Infection Signals to Surrounding Tissues, Developmental Cell, 51, 1
- 10.1101/2021.03.19.436153 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004507 · DOI
- 10.1093/GBE/EVZ191 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2015.0291 · DOI
- 10.1099/ijs.0.000117-0 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M408220200 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80392-5 · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00387 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12862-016-0805-y · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02620 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-019-2766-9 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00726-014-1820-1 · DOI
- 10.1038/nprot.2007.521 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.06.008 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13238-017-0495-2 · DOI
- 10.1128/AAC.02434-15 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2007626117 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5449 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature10811 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02115.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.02995.x · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2148-8-113 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature12977 · DOI
- 10.5114/pdia.2015.48066 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.0803959 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81895-4 · DOI
- 10.1159/000097023 · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.113.156737 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.45061 · DOI
- 10.1128/AAC.44.3.602-607.2000 · DOI
- 1994, Insect immunity: Septic injury of drosophila induces the synthesis of a potent antifungal peptide with sequence homology to plant antifungal peptides, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 269, 33159, 10.1016/S0021-9258(20)30111-3 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanson, M. A., Kondo, S., & Lemaitre, B.
- Affiliations
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- National Institute of Genetics (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Hanson, M.A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-04-21
- Volume
- 289
- Issue
- 1977
- Pages
- 20220773-20220773
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9233930
- OpenAlex
- W4283317109
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Novartis Foundation (532114)
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (186397)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
- Keywords
- drosocin, antimicrobial peptides, furin cleavage, Enterobacter cloacae, humoral immune response, host susceptibility
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Drosophila, Drosophila melanogaster, Glycopeptides, Immunity, Innate, Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review