PreprintCited by 17Photosynthetic Processes and MechanismsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Three-dimensional envelope and subunit interactions of the plastid-encoded RNA polymerase from Sinapis alba

Open access
Ruedas, Rémi, Couté, Yohann, Kieffer-Jacquinod, Sylvie, Sankari Muthukumar, Soumiya, Gillet, François-Xavier, Fenel, Daphna, Effantin, Grégory, Pfannschmidt, Thomas, Blanvillain, Robert, Cobessi, David·2022·International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Preprint — published as 10.3390/ijms23179922 · Paper page

Abstract

RNA polymerases (RNAPs) involved in gene transcription are found in all living organisms with degrees of complexity ranging from single polypeptide chains to multimeric enzymes. In the chloroplasts, the nuclear-encoded RNA polymerase and the plastid-encoded RNA polymerase (PEP) are both involved in the selective transcription of the plastid genome. The PEP is a prokaryotic-type multimeric RNAP found in different states depending on light stimuli and cell identity. One of its active states requires the assembly of nuclear-encoded PEP-Associated Proteins (PAPs) on the catalytic core, producing a complex of more than 900 kDa regarded as essential for chloroplast biogenesis. A purification procedure compatible with structural analysis was used to enrich the native PEP from Sinapis alba chloroplasts. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomic analysis identified the core components, the PAPs and additional members, and coupled to cross-linking (XL-MS) provided initial structural information about the relative position of PEP subunits. Sequence alignments of the catalytic core subunits across various chloroplasts of the green lineage and prokaryotes combined with structural data show that the overall shape of the catalytic core and the residues essential for the catalytic activity are conserved. However, variations are observed at the surface of the core, some of them corresponding to PAP binding sites as suggested by XL-MS experiments. Using negative stain electron microscopy, the PEP 3D envelope was calculated. 3D classification shows that the protrusions which we attribute to the PAPs are firmly associated with the catalytic core. Overall, the shape of the S. alba PEP envelope is different from that of RNAPs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.05.04.490580

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1016/S1011-1344(98)00063-3 · DOI
  2. 10.1105/tpc.109.071001 · DOI
  3. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00781 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa118 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1002/pmic.201200565 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.007 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0959-440X(02)00294-4 · DOI
  8. 10.3389/fpls.2021.668897 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.035 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03379.x · DOI
  11. 10.1104/pp.111.184762 · DOI
  12. 10.1186/1471-2229-12-102 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.05.021 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/emboj/16.13.4041 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.07.002 · DOI
  16. 10.3389/fpls.2015.01078 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nature06530 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/s41596-018-0068-8 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.08.024 · DOI
  20. 10.3389/fmolb.2016.00073 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/s00425-018-2924-8 · DOI
  22. 10.15252/embj.2020104941 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.02.026 · DOI
  24. 10.1104/pp.111.188474 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.182432999 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1105/tpc.108.061341 · DOI
  27. 10.3390/biom5020848 · DOI
  28. 10.1104/pp.16.00116 · DOI
  29. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000483 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/nar/gky1106 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
  32. 10.1105/tpc.105.036392 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.11.003 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/BF00024199 · DOI
  35. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.00991.x · DOI
  36. 10.1093/jxb/erv415 · DOI
  37. 10.1042/BCJ20161077 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.006 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1128/jb.170.9.4136-4140.1988 · DOI
  41. 10.1104/pp.111.184515 · DOI
  42. 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0004-2018 · DOI
  43. 10.1007/BF00015612 · DOI
  44. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02195.x · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.002 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/S1360-1385(99)01407-7 · DOI
  47. 10.1104/pp.113.228726 · DOI
  48. 10.1073/pnas.1119403109 · DOI
  49. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00061 · DOI
  50. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01718.x · DOI
  51. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00316 · DOI
  52. 10.1093/mp/sst092 · DOI
  53. 10.1105/tpc.111.089441 · DOI
  54. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001994 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Ruedas, R., Couté, Y., Kieffer-Jacquinod, S., Sankari Muthukumar, S., Gillet, F.-X., Fenel, D., Effantin, G., Pfannschmidt, T., Blanvillain, R., & Cobessi, D.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Blanvillain, Robert
  • Cobessi, David
Venue
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-05-04
Volume
23
Issue
17
Pages
9922-9922
ISSN
1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4294307745
Cited by
17
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (UAR 3518 CNRS-CEA-UGA-EMBL, ANR-10-INBS-0008, ANR-10-INBS-08, ANR-17-EURE-0003, ANR-17-EURE-, 10-INBS-08, ANR-10-INBS-08-01, ANR-17-CE11-0031, ANR-17, ANR-10, ANR-10-INBS-0005)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (ANR‐17‐EURE‐0003, UAR 3518 CNRS-CEA-UGA-EMBL)
  • French Infrastructure for Integrated Structural Biology (ANR-17-EURE-0003, UMS 3518, ANR-10-INBS-0005, UMS 3518 CNRS-CEA-UGA-EMBL, ANR-10-INBS-000502, ANR-10-INBS, ANR-17-CE11-0031-02, ANR-10-INBS-08-01 grant)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
plastid-encoded RNA polymerase, chloroplast transcription, Sinapis alba, protein complex structure, subunit interactions, chloroplast biogenesis, cross-linking mass spectrometry, negative stain electron microscopy
MeSH terms
Chloroplasts, DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases, Plastids, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Arabidopsis Proteins, Sinapis, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review