The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Markov State Modelling Reveals Heterogeneous Drug-Inhibition Mechanism of Calmodulin
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010583 · Paper page
Abstract
Calmodulin (CaM) is a calcium sensor which binds and regulates a wide range of target-proteins. This implicitly enables the concentration of calcium to influence many downstream physiological responses, including muscle contraction, learning and depression. The antipsychotic drug trifluoperazine (TFP) is a known CaM inhibitor. By binding to various sites, TFP prevents CaM from associating to target-proteins. However, the molecular and state-dependent mechanisms behind CaM inhibition by drugs such as TFP are largely unknown. Here, we build a Markov state model (MSM) from adaptively sampled molecular dynamics simulations and reveal the structural and dynamical features behind the inhibitory mechanism of TFP-binding to the C-terminal domain of CaM. We specifically identify three major TFP binding-modes from the MSM macrostates, and distinguish their effect on CaM conformation by using a systematic analysis protocol based on biophysical descriptors and tools from machine learning. The results show that depending on the binding orientation, TFP effectively stabilizes features of the calcium-unbound CaM, either affecting the CaM hydrophobic binding pocket, the calcium binding sites or the secondary structure content in the bound domain. The conclusions drawn from this work may in the future serve to formulate a complete model of pharmacological modulation of CaM, which furthers our understanding of how these drugs affect signaling pathways as well as associated diseases. Author summary: Calmodulin (CaM) is a calcium-sensing protein which makes other proteins dependent on the surrounding calcium concentration by binding to these proteins. Such protein-protein interactions with CaM are vital for calcium to control many physiological pathways within the cell. The antipsychotic drug trifluoperazine (TFP) inhibits CaM’s ability to bind and regulate other proteins. Here, we use molecular dynamics simulations together with Markov state modeling and machine learning to understand the structural and dynamical features by which TFP bound to the one domain of CaM prevents association to other proteins. We find that TFP encourages CaM to adopt a conformation that is like the one stabilized in absence of calcium: depending on the binding orientation of TFP, the drug indeed either affects the CaM hydrophobic binding pocket, the calcium binding sites or the secondary structure content in the domain. Understanding TFP binding is a first step towards designing better drugs targeting CaM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics
Chodera, J. D., & Noé, F. (2014) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2014.04.002 · Cited by 776
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 73
- 10.1093/nar/gkw1092 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrm1155 · DOI
- 10.1111/febs.12296 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100458 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006072 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.08.037 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.05.016 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90324-D · DOI
- 10.1038/nsb0995-768 · DOI
- 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)92938-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00504-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0167-4889(85)90099-0 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms10910 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00454 · DOI
- 10.1021/jacs.0c11156 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.1014g.x · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00346 · DOI
- 10.1016/0143-4160(88)90028-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-2952(82)90104-6 · DOI
- 2022, Potential of phenothiazines to synergistically block calmodulin and reactivate PP2A in cancer cells, PLoS One, 17, e0268635., 10.1371/journal.pone.0268635 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb29621.x · DOI
- 10.1021/bi00255a006 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsb1194-795 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi980795a · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.24781 · DOI
- 10.1042/0264-6021:3470211 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)01637-8 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0021889807002117 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi00322a020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.06.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.22739 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90608-0 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.448118 · DOI
- 10.1021/jp204407d · DOI
- 10.1080/00268976.2013.824126 · DOI
- 10.1039/b716554d · DOI
- 10.1021/ct2004484 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00500 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.05.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.09.018 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.464397 · DOI
- 10.1021/ct700200b · DOI
- 10.1063/1.328693 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9601(95)00973-6 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.23354 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsmb.3230 · DOI
- 10.1021/jp505332p · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00553 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00332-019-09567-y · DOI
- 10.1063/1.4811489 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.015 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.10.042 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00743 · DOI
- 10.1021/jp037421y · DOI
- 10.1021/jp037422q · DOI
- 10.1016/j.laa.2004.10.026 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11634-013-0134-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.12.016 · DOI · Paper page
- Pedregosa F , Michel V , Grisel O , Blondel M , Prettenhofer P , Weiss R , et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2011;12.
- 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ijch.201600040 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1600385113 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1808733115 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001216 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.04.022 · DOI
- 10.1093/jb/mvx025 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.019 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.abd6798 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3188 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b00475 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00130-7 · DOI
- 10.2174/157340909789577874 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Westerlund, A. M., Sridhar, A., Dahl, L., Andersson, A., Bodnar, A.-Y., & Delemotte, L.
- Affiliations
- Science for Life Laboratory (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Delemotte, Lucie
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-06-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e1010583-e1010583
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9581412
- OpenAlex
- W4303449081
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 0.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Göran Gustafssons Stiftelser
- Swedish e-Science Research Centre
- Vetenskapsrådet (2019-02433, VR 2018, 2018-, 2018-04905)
- Science for Life Laboratory
- HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (898762)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Keywords
- calmodulin, trifluoperazine, Markov state models, C-terminal domain, calcium sensor, binding mode, protein conformational dynamics, calcium binding sites, hydrophobic pocket, antipsychotic drugs, adaptive sampling
- MeSH terms
- Binding Sites, Calcium, Calmodulin, Protein Binding, Antipsychotic Agents, Trifluoperazine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review