Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 22Hepatitis Viruses Studies and EpidemiologyAnimal Virus Infections StudiesEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural features stabilized by divalent cation coordination within hepatitis E virus ORF1 are critical for viral replication

Open access
LeDesma, Robert, Biswas, Abhishek, Maya, Stephanie, Gili, Stefania, Higgins, John, Ploss, Alexander·2022·eLife
DOI 10.1101/2022.06.14.496061PMC PMC9977285

Preprint — published as 10.7554/elife.80529 · Paper page

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an RNA virus responsible for over 20 million infections annually. HEV’s open reading frame (ORF)1 polyprotein is essential for genome replication, though it is unknown how the different subdomains function within a structural context. Our data show that ORF1 operates as a multifunctional protein, which is not subject to proteolytic processing. Supporting this model, scanning mutagenesis performed on the putative papain-like cysteine protease (pPCP) domain revealed six cysteines essential for viral replication. Our data are consistent with their role in divalent metal ion coordination, which governs local and interdomain interactions that are critical for the overall structure of ORF1; further, the “pPCP” domain can only rescue viral genome replication in trans when expressed in the context of the full-length ORF1 protein but not as an individual subdomain. Taken together our work provides a comprehensive model of the structure and function of HEV ORF1. Significance Statement: The development of non-teratogenic and potent antiviral therapies against HEV have been hindered by an incomplete understanding of the viral replication cycle. Our work provides a mechanistic insight into the complex replicative cycle of this understudied human pathogen and identifies a novel domain-domain interaction that is vital for replicative fitness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.06.14.496061

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Mutations within the hepatitis E virus (HEV) putative protease domain render the virus replication incompetent. (a) Genome organization of HEV and Kernow strain genotype 3 reporter replicon. ORF2 and ORF3 were replaced by a Gaussia Luciferase reporter in frame with the subgenomic promoter and translation start site. MeT – methyltransferase; Y – Y-domain; PCP – putative papain-like cysteine protease; HVR – hypervariable region; X – macro-domain; Hel – helicase; RdRp – RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. The putative catalytic dyad of HEV within the reporter replicon pPCP is denoted (residues C483 and Y590). GDD – catalytic triad of RdRp. Gluc – Gaussia Luciferase. (b), Replication kinetics of Kc1/p6 WT HEV Gluc RNA or HEV pol (-) Gluc, or HEV RNA bearing mutations in the putative PCP transfected into HUH7.5 cells. Cell culture supernatants were collected from transfected cells at time points indicated (drop in signal at D2 indicates wash step to eliminate signal from input RNA). (c) End point analysis (day 4) of data from panel b. (d–g) End point analysis (4 days post transfection) comparison of C483A mutant replication kinetics to WT and pol (-) in (d), Kernow strain (genotype 3) (e), SHEV (genotype 3) strain (f), SAR55 (genotype 1) and (g), TW6196E (genotype 4) of HEV when transfected into HepG2C3A human hepatoma cells. (h) Alternate cysteine and alanine codons at C483 show viral replication deficiency caused by amino acid substitution and not RNA base substitution. These data represent an end point analysis (4 days post transfection) when HEV RNA replicons are transfected into HUH7 human hepatoma cells. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison analysis were conducted to determine significance. * - p<0.05, ** - p<0.01, *** - p<0.001, and **** - p<0.0001. Data shown in d–g are from experiments done in technical and biological triplicate. Data shown in b, c, and h are from experiments done in technical triplicate and biological duplicate. Raw Gluc data provided in file Figure 1—source data 1.
Figure 1. Mutations within the hepatitis E virus (HEV) putative protease domain render the virus replication incompetent. (a) Genome organization of HEV and Kernow strain genotype 3 reporter replicon. ORF2 and ORF3 were replaced by a Gaussia Luciferase reporter in frame with the subgenomic promoter and translation start site. MeT – methyltransferase; Y – Y-domain; PCP – putative papain-like cysteine protease; HVR – hypervariable region; X – macro-domain; Hel – helicase; RdRp – RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. The putative catalytic dyad of HEV within the reporter replicon pPCP is denoted (residues C483 and Y590). GDD – catalytic triad of RdRp. Gluc – Gaussia Luciferase. (b), Replication kinetics of Kc1/p6 WT HEV Gluc RNA or HEV pol (-) Gluc, or HEV RNA bearing mutations in the putative PCP transfected into HUH7.5 cells. Cell culture supernatants were collected from transfected cells at time points indicated (drop in signal at D2 indicates wash step to eliminate signal from input RNA). (c) End point analysis (day 4) of data from panel b. (d–g) End point analysis (4 days post transfection) comparison of C483A mutant replication kinetics to WT and pol (-) in (d), Kernow strain (genotype 3) (e), SHEV (genotype 3) strain (f), SAR55 (genotype 1) and (g), TW6196E (genotype 4) of HEV when transfected into HepG2C3A human hepatoma cells. (h) Alternate cysteine and alanine codons at C483 show viral replication deficiency caused by amino acid substitution and not RNA base substitution. These data represent an end point analysis (4 days post transfection) when HEV RNA replicons are transfected into HUH7 human hepatoma cells. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison analysis were conducted to determine significance. * - p<0.05, ** - p<0.01, *** - p<0.001, and **** - p<0.0001. Data shown in d–g are from experiments done in technical and biological triplicate. Data shown in b, c, and h are from experiments done in technical triplicate and biological duplicate. Raw Gluc data provided in file Figure 1—source data 1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Alignment of one or more representative strain(s) from each known hepatitis E virus (HEV) genotype putative papain-like cysteine protease (PCP) domain with rubella virus (RUBV) protease reveals highly conserved octa-cysteine motif in HEV. Black – HEV putative PCP. Brown – upstream flanking 32 AAs – downstream flanking 8 AAs. (*) Catalytic dyad of RUBV protease at putative catalytic dyad positions within HEV putative PCP domain. Bold – eight highly conserved cysteines across all known HEV genotypes. TW4 - HEV strain TW6196E. Alignments generated using ClustalW algorithm within the genome sequence viewing program SnapGene.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Alignment of one or more representative strain(s) from each known hepatitis E virus (HEV) genotype putative papain-like cysteine protease (PCP) domain with rubella virus (RUBV) protease reveals highly conserved octa-cysteine motif in HEV. Black – HEV putative PCP. Brown – upstream flanking 32 AAs – downstream flanking 8 AAs. (*) Catalytic dyad of RUBV protease at putative catalytic dyad positions within HEV putative PCP domain. Bold – eight highly conserved cysteines across all known HEV genotypes. TW4 - HEV strain TW6196E. Alignments generated using ClustalW algorithm within the genome sequence viewing program SnapGene.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Hepatitis E virus (HEV) ORF1 putative papain-like cysteine protease (pPCP) cannot function outside of the context of the full-length protein, and C483A replication deficiency can be rescued in trans. (a) Schematic of the transcomplementation assay. HepG2C3A human hepatoma cells were transduced with lentivirus expressing HEV ORF1 wt, Pol (-), C483A, or pPCP only (ORF1 AAs 433–592 in Kc1/p6) and subsequently transfected with in vitro transcribed RNA of wt, pol (-), or C483A replicons. End point analysis was conducted 4 days post transfection with Gaussia luciferase quantification. Cells transduced with WT ORF1 can rescue luciferase expression in pol (-) and C483A mutants in trans, whereas all other conditions, including the pPCP out of context of ORF1, cannot. (b–e) End point analysis of fold change luciferase signal over WT replicon signal of (b), Mock (c), WT (d), Pol (-), or (e), C483A. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison analysis were conducted to determine significance. * - p<0.05, ** - p<0.01, *** - p<0.001, and **** - p<0.0001. Schematic in panel a generated with BioRender. Pol (-) – replication incompetent replicon due to mutation in RNA dependent RNA polymerase. Gluc – Gaussia luciferase. Data shown in b–e are from experiments done in technical and biological triplicate. Raw Gluc data provided in file Figure 2—source data 1.
Figure 2. Hepatitis E virus (HEV) ORF1 putative papain-like cysteine protease (pPCP) cannot function outside of the context of the full-length protein, and C483A replication deficiency can be rescued in trans. (a) Schematic of the transcomplementation assay. HepG2C3A human hepatoma cells were transduced with lentivirus expressing HEV ORF1 wt, Pol (-), C483A, or pPCP only (ORF1 AAs 433–592 in Kc1/p6) and subsequently transfected with in vitro transcribed RNA of wt, pol (-), or C483A replicons. End point analysis was conducted 4 days post transfection with Gaussia luciferase quantification. Cells transduced with WT ORF1 can rescue luciferase expression in pol (-) and C483A mutants in trans, whereas all other conditions, including the pPCP out of context of ORF1, cannot. (b–e) End point analysis of fold change luciferase signal over WT replicon signal of (b), Mock (c), WT (d), Pol (-), or (e), C483A. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison analysis were conducted to determine significance. * - p<0.05, ** - p<0.01, *** - p<0.001, and **** - p<0.0001. Schematic in panel a generated with BioRender. Pol (-) – replication incompetent replicon due to mutation in RNA dependent RNA polymerase. Gluc – Gaussia luciferase. Data shown in b–e are from experiments done in technical and biological triplicate. Raw Gluc data provided in file Figure 2—source data 1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Point mutations of highly conserved cysteines and alanine scanning mutagenesis within putative papain-like cysteine protease (pPCP) identifies residues and regions indispensable for viral replication. (a) Partial sequence of Kc1/p6 hepatitis E virus (HEV) ORF1 including pPCP that shows eight cysteines that are highly conserved across all eight known HEV genotypes. Orange – upstream 40 amino acids within Y domain prior to pPCP. Blue – downstream 40 amino acids within HVR after pPCP. (b), HepG2C3A cells were transfected with in vitro transcribed RNA of WT, polymerase deficient, or point mutants in one of the conserved cysteines within the pPCP. Cell culture supernatants were collected for 4 days post transfection prior to Gaussia luciferase (Gluc) quantification. (c) Unbiased triplet alanine scanning mutagenesis of entire pPCP region. HepG2C3A cells were transfected with in vitro transcribed RNA of triplet alanine scanning mutant replicons to assess viral replication capacity. Data shown are fold change of wild type replicon. Brown-Forsythe one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparison analysis were conducted to determine significance. * - p<0.05, ** - p<0.01, *** - p<0.001, and **** - p<0.0001. HVR – hypervariable region. Raw Gluc data provided in file Figure 3—source data 1.
Figure 3. Point mutations of highly conserved cysteines and alanine scanning mutagenesis within putative papain-like cysteine protease (pPCP) identifies residues and regions indispensable for viral replication. (a) Partial sequence of Kc1/p6 hepatitis E virus (HEV) ORF1 including pPCP that shows eight cysteines that are highly conserved across all eight known HEV genotypes. Orange – upstream 40 amino acids within Y domain prior to pPCP. Blue – downstream 40 amino acids within HVR after pPCP. (b), HepG2C3A cells were transfected with in vitro transcribed RNA of WT, polymerase deficient, or point mutants in one of the conserved cysteines within the pPCP. Cell culture supernatants were collected for 4 days post transfection prior to Gaussia luciferase (Gluc) quantification. (c) Unbiased triplet alanine scanning mutagenesis of entire pPCP region. HepG2C3A cells were transfected with in vitro transcribed RNA of triplet alanine scanning mutant replicons to assess viral replication capacity. Data shown are fold change of wild type replicon. Brown-Forsythe one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparison analysis were conducted to determine significance. * - p<0.05, ** - p<0.01, *** - p<0.001, and **** - p<0.0001. HVR – hypervariable region. Raw Gluc data provided in file Figure 3—source data 1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Bioinformatic analysis (PROSITE) predicts CxC[X11]CC[X8]CxC motif (CxC motif) to be necessary for divalent metal ion coordination. (a) Bioinformatic pipeline depicting hexa-cysteine motif search across all deposited proteins in UniProt and TrEMBLE databases. Exact hepatitis E virus (HEV) motif search yielded 25 protein hits, all with unknown functions (right side). 11 amino acids upstream of core CC motif and eight amino acid motif downstream of core CC were relaxed by (±) 1 to yield 26 protein hits, all with known functions and an enrichment for divalent ion binding activity. (b) Utilizing motif searches with ScanProSite (de Castro et al., 2006) and TrEMBLE (Bairoch and Apweiler, 2000; Boeckmann et al., 2003; O’Donovan et al., 2002), we used a relaxed expression of the CxC motif where each stretch of [x] could be (±) 1: (CxC[x](10-12)CC[x](7-9)CxC). This analysis brought forth 26 proteins with known functions, enriched for proteins with divalent metal ion binding activity. Green: proteins that matched the first stretch of [x 10–12]. Orange: proteins that matched the second stretch of [x 7–9].
Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Bioinformatic analysis (PROSITE) predicts CxC[X11]CC[X8]CxC motif (CxC motif) to be necessary for divalent metal ion coordination. (a) Bioinformatic pipeline depicting hexa-cysteine motif search across all deposited proteins in UniProt and TrEMBLE databases. Exact hepatitis E virus (HEV) motif search yielded 25 protein hits, all with unknown functions (right side). 11 amino acids upstream of core CC motif and eight amino acid motif downstream of core CC were relaxed by (±) 1 to yield 26 protein hits, all with known functions and an enrichment for divalent ion binding activity. (b) Utilizing motif searches with ScanProSite (de Castro et al., 2006) and TrEMBLE (Bairoch and Apweiler, 2000; Boeckmann et al., 2003; O’Donovan et al., 2002), we used a relaxed expression of the CxC motif where each stretch of [x] could be (±) 1: (CxC[x](10-12)CC[x](7-9)CxC). This analysis brought forth 26 proteins with known functions, enriched for proteins with divalent metal ion binding activity. Green: proteins that matched the first stretch of [x 10–12]. Orange: proteins that matched the second stretch of [x 7–9].CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4. Structural prediction models of hepatitis E virus (HEV) putative papain-like cysteine protease (pPCP) demonstrates low-confidence scores, suggesting lack of highly ordered secondary structure. (a) HEV ORF1-WT AlphaFold structure prediction. (b) HEV ORF1-WT AlphaFold structure prediction pseudo-colored by pLDDT score gradation (darker blue – higher pLDDT Score, darker red – lower pLDDT score). (c) pLDDT score of AlphaFold prediction of HEV ORF1 across HEV genome organization for all of ORF1 (black, average 76.96), pPCP when measured with entirety of ORF1 (green, average 66.05), and pPCP when predicted by AlphaFold alone (purple, average 65.92). (d) HEV ORF1 pPCP AlphaFold prediction pseudo-colored by alanine scanning mutagenesis ORF1 replication tolerance. Color based on fold change of WT in (Figure 3C). Orange – below (–2) Sea green – between (–2) and (–1). Cornflower blue – between (–1) and 0. Dark blue – replicated above WT levels. Beginning and end residues of pPCP noted in bold.
Figure 4. Structural prediction models of hepatitis E virus (HEV) putative papain-like cysteine protease (pPCP) demonstrates low-confidence scores, suggesting lack of highly ordered secondary structure. (a) HEV ORF1-WT AlphaFold structure prediction. (b) HEV ORF1-WT AlphaFold structure prediction pseudo-colored by pLDDT score gradation (darker blue – higher pLDDT Score, darker red – lower pLDDT score). (c) pLDDT score of AlphaFold prediction of HEV ORF1 across HEV genome organization for all of ORF1 (black, average 76.96), pPCP when measured with entirety of ORF1 (green, average 66.05), and pPCP when predicted by AlphaFold alone (purple, average 65.92). (d) HEV ORF1 pPCP AlphaFold prediction pseudo-colored by alanine scanning mutagenesis ORF1 replication tolerance. Color based on fold change of WT in (Figure 3C). Orange – below (–2) Sea green – between (–2) and (–1). Cornflower blue – between (–1) and 0. Dark blue – replicated above WT levels. Beginning and end residues of pPCP noted in bold.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4—figure supplement 1. AlphaFold predicts structured domains of hepatitis E virus (HEV) ORF1 and viral protease of hepatitis A virus (HAV) with high confidence. (a–c) Superimposition of AlphaFold (A.F.) prediction of corresponding Kernow C1/p6 ORF1 regions (Bronze) plus distance plot in (Å) and pLDDT score of A.F. prediction with: (a) the crystal structure of HEV SAR-55 ORF1 amino acids 510–691 (Blue; PDB: 6NU9; Proudfoot et al., 2019). (b) Amphipathic ‘thumb’ of HEV gt3 strain 83-2-27 RNA dependent RNA Polymerase (amino acids 1628–1647; ORF1 kc1/p6 residues 1684–1709; Purple; Oechslin et al., 2022). (c) Macro domains of Sindbis virus (Green; SINV amino acids 1342–1,509 of PDB: 4GUA; Shin et al., 2012) and Chikungunya virus (Pink; CHIKV; PDB: 3GPG; Malet et al., 2009). (d) Superimposition of HAV 3 C protease with corresponding A.F. prediction plus distance plot in (Å) and pLDDT score of A.F. prediction. Orange – HAV 3 C protease (PDB: 1QA7; Bergmann et al., 1999) and Purple – HAV 3 C protease A.F. prediction. Hatched lines show averages of corresponding measurement.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1. AlphaFold predicts structured domains of hepatitis E virus (HEV) ORF1 and viral protease of hepatitis A virus (HAV) with high confidence. (a–c) Superimposition of AlphaFold (A.F.) prediction of corresponding Kernow C1/p6 ORF1 regions (Bronze) plus distance plot in (Å) and pLDDT score of A.F. prediction with: (a) the crystal structure of HEV SAR-55 ORF1 amino acids 510–691 (Blue; PDB: 6NU9; Proudfoot et al., 2019). (b) Amphipathic ‘thumb’ of HEV gt3 strain 83-2-27 RNA dependent RNA Polymerase (amino acids 1628–1647; ORF1 kc1/p6 residues 1684–1709; Purple; Oechslin et al., 2022). (c) Macro domains of Sindbis virus (Green; SINV amino acids 1342–1,509 of PDB: 4GUA; Shin et al., 2012) and Chikungunya virus (Pink; CHIKV; PDB: 3GPG; Malet et al., 2009). (d) Superimposition of HAV 3 C protease with corresponding A.F. prediction plus distance plot in (Å) and pLDDT score of A.F. prediction. Orange – HAV 3 C protease (PDB: 1QA7; Bergmann et al., 1999) and Purple – HAV 3 C protease A.F. prediction. Hatched lines show averages of corresponding measurement.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4—figure supplement 2. Sequence alignment of Kc1/p6 macrodomain with macrodomains of Sindbis virus (SINV) and Chikungunya virus (CHIKV). Alignment of ORF1 macrodomain (AAs 857–1000) with SINV macrodomain (AAs 1342–1,509 of PDB: 4GUA; Shin et al., 2012) and CHIKV macrodomain (PDB: 3DPG; Malet et al., 2009). Dash – gap in alignment. Colon - similar amino acid. Period – dissimilar amino acid. Line – identical amino acid.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2. Sequence alignment of Kc1/p6 macrodomain with macrodomains of Sindbis virus (SINV) and Chikungunya virus (CHIKV). Alignment of ORF1 macrodomain (AAs 857–1000) with SINV macrodomain (AAs 1342–1,509 of PDB: 4GUA; Shin et al., 2012) and CHIKV macrodomain (PDB: 3DPG; Malet et al., 2009). Dash – gap in alignment. Colon - similar amino acid. Period – dissimilar amino acid. Line – identical amino acid.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5. Structural prediction models suggest conserved cysteines within CxC[x11]CC[x8]CxC motif form divalent ion coordination pockets and novel domain-domain interaction with upstream Y-domain. (a) Alphafold structural predictions of domains within hepatitis E virus (HEV) ORF1. Left: pseudo zinc-finger (amino acids 451–493 within putative papain-like cysteine protease [pPCP]). Magenta: conserved cysteines C457, C459, C471, C472, C481, and C483A. Potential divalent ion coordination tetrahedron outlined in yellow hatched line. Middle: amino acids 242–259 of HEV ORF1 Y-domain, and amino acids 451–462 of HEV pPCP. Conserved cysteines C457 and C459 are outlined in magenta. D248 and H249 of upstream Y-domain highlighted in blue. Novel interdomain divalent ion coordination domain outlined in yellow hatched line. Right: HEV ORF1 protein demonstrating folding of WT and point mutant proteins. Orange (AAs 1–1036): methyltransferase (Magden et al., 2001). Yellow (AAs 1018–1262): Helicase (Devhare et al., 2014; Karpe and Lole, 2010). Red (AAs 1257–1709): RNA dependent RNA polymerase (Koonin et al., 1992; Oechslin et al., 2022). Cyan: Putative membrane association domain (Parvez, 2017). (b) Multiple sequence alignment of HEV genotypes 1–8 of partial Y-domain containing variable residue D248 and highly conserved residue H249. (*) identical residue. (:) similar residue. (.) dissimilar residue. Yellow hatched line – bonds between coordinating amino acids.
Figure 5. Structural prediction models suggest conserved cysteines within CxC[x11]CC[x8]CxC motif form divalent ion coordination pockets and novel domain-domain interaction with upstream Y-domain. (a) Alphafold structural predictions of domains within hepatitis E virus (HEV) ORF1. Left: pseudo zinc-finger (amino acids 451–493 within putative papain-like cysteine protease [pPCP]). Magenta: conserved cysteines C457, C459, C471, C472, C481, and C483A. Potential divalent ion coordination tetrahedron outlined in yellow hatched line. Middle: amino acids 242–259 of HEV ORF1 Y-domain, and amino acids 451–462 of HEV pPCP. Conserved cysteines C457 and C459 are outlined in magenta. D248 and H249 of upstream Y-domain highlighted in blue. Novel interdomain divalent ion coordination domain outlined in yellow hatched line. Right: HEV ORF1 protein demonstrating folding of WT and point mutant proteins. Orange (AAs 1–1036): methyltransferase (Magden et al., 2001). Yellow (AAs 1018–1262): Helicase (Devhare et al., 2014; Karpe and Lole, 2010). Red (AAs 1257–1709): RNA dependent RNA polymerase (Koonin et al., 1992; Oechslin et al., 2022). Cyan: Putative membrane association domain (Parvez, 2017). (b) Multiple sequence alignment of HEV genotypes 1–8 of partial Y-domain containing variable residue D248 and highly conserved residue H249. (*) identical residue. (:) similar residue. (.) dissimilar residue. Yellow hatched line – bonds between coordinating amino acids.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Replication end point analysis of WT-HA, D248A, and H249A Gaussia luciferase (Gluc) constructs. HepG2C3A cells were transfected with in vitro transcribed RNA of WT, polymerase deficient, WT-HA-tagged, or point mutants in one of the upstream interacting Y-domain (D248A and H249A). Cell culture supernatants were collected for 4 days post transfection prior to Gluc quantification. Experiments were conducted in technical and biological triplicate.
Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Replication end point analysis of WT-HA, D248A, and H249A Gaussia luciferase (Gluc) constructs. HepG2C3A cells were transfected with in vitro transcribed RNA of WT, polymerase deficient, WT-HA-tagged, or point mutants in one of the upstream interacting Y-domain (D248A and H249A). Cell culture supernatants were collected for 4 days post transfection prior to Gluc quantification. Experiments were conducted in technical and biological triplicate.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) shows divalent cation coordination by hepatitis E virus (HEV) ORF1. (a) HA-epitope tag flanked by linker sequence inserted into hypervariable region (HVR) of HEV ORF1 lentiviral construct. (b) Western blot analysis of HUH7 human hepatoma cell produced epitope tagged ORF1 purification (crude cell lysate, unbound fraction, purified ORF1). (c) Workflow of protein sample preparation, purification, and HNO3/H2O2 digestion for ICP-MS. IP- Immuno-purification WT HA-tagged ORF1 (left), C483A HA-tagged ORF1 (middle), and C563A HA-tagged ORF1 (right). (d) Fold-change over WT of biologically relevant divalent metal ions (Zheng et al., 2008) bound by purified mutant epitope tagged ORF1. Any trace metal not measured as a value above a MilliQ water only purification control was excluded from this analysis on a run-by-run basis due to not being above IP buffer elution conditions. Two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison analysis were conducted to determine significance. * - p<0.05, ** - p<0.01, *** - p<0.001, and **** - p<0.0001. Schematics in a and c were created with Biorender.com. Unedited western blots included in file Figure 6—source data 1.
Figure 6. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) shows divalent cation coordination by hepatitis E virus (HEV) ORF1. (a) HA-epitope tag flanked by linker sequence inserted into hypervariable region (HVR) of HEV ORF1 lentiviral construct. (b) Western blot analysis of HUH7 human hepatoma cell produced epitope tagged ORF1 purification (crude cell lysate, unbound fraction, purified ORF1). (c) Workflow of protein sample preparation, purification, and HNO3/H2O2 digestion for ICP-MS. IP- Immuno-purification WT HA-tagged ORF1 (left), C483A HA-tagged ORF1 (middle), and C563A HA-tagged ORF1 (right). (d) Fold-change over WT of biologically relevant divalent metal ions (Zheng et al., 2008) bound by purified mutant epitope tagged ORF1. Any trace metal not measured as a value above a MilliQ water only purification control was excluded from this analysis on a run-by-run basis due to not being above IP buffer elution conditions. Two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison analysis were conducted to determine significance. * - p<0.05, ** - p<0.01, *** - p<0.001, and **** - p<0.0001. Schematics in a and c were created with Biorender.com. Unedited western blots included in file Figure 6—source data 1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6—figure supplement 1. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) shows divalent cation coordination by hepatitis E virus (HEV) ORF1 disrutped when mutated at residue C483.
Figure 6—figure supplement 1. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) shows divalent cation coordination by hepatitis E virus (HEV) ORF1 disrutped when mutated at residue C483.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7. Immunofluorescence of epitope tagged ORF1 demonstrates loss of membrane association when divalent ion coordination residues are mutated. Confocal microscopy images of HUH7 cells stably expressing ORF1 bicistronic for zsGreen. ORF1-HA tagged proteins were imaged using a rabbit-anti-HA antibody and AlexaFluor647 (goat anti-rabbit IgG [H+L]) secondary antibody. Nuclei were visualized with Hoechst 33342 stain. All images taken at 40× magnification and analyzed using Fiji (ImageJ2) image analysis software. Source files of all TIFF images included in Figure 7—source data 1.
Figure 7. Immunofluorescence of epitope tagged ORF1 demonstrates loss of membrane association when divalent ion coordination residues are mutated. Confocal microscopy images of HUH7 cells stably expressing ORF1 bicistronic for zsGreen. ORF1-HA tagged proteins were imaged using a rabbit-anti-HA antibody and AlexaFluor647 (goat anti-rabbit IgG [H+L]) secondary antibody. Nuclei were visualized with Hoechst 33342 stain. All images taken at 40× magnification and analyzed using Fiji (ImageJ2) image analysis software. Source files of all TIFF images included in Figure 7—source data 1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Author response image 1.
Author response image 1. CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9071(200003)60:3<275::AID-JMV5>3.0.CO;2-9 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/nar/28.1.45 · DOI
  3. 10.1006/viro.1999.9968 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/nar/gkg095 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz236 · DOI
  6. 2018, Interactions between metal binding viral proteins and human targets as revealed by network-based bioinformatics, J Inorg Biochem, 186, 157, 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2018.06.012 · DOI
  7. de Castro, E. , Sigrist, C. J. , Gattiker, A. , Bulliard, V. , Langendijk-Genevaux, P. S. , Gasteiger, E. , Bairoch, A. , & Hulo, N. (2006). ScanProsite: detection of PROSITE signature matches and ProRule-associated functional and structural residues in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res, 34(Web Server issue), W362-365. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl124 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.02.018 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.1803406115 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.1614955114 · DOI
  11. 2018, Identification of the Intragenomic Promoter Controlling Hepatitis E Virus Subgenomic RNA Transcription, MBio, 9, 3
  12. 10.1128/JVI.78.9.4838-4846.2004 · DOI
  13. 10.1128/JVI.79.2.1017-1026.2005 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/lt.22014 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/jvh.12157 · DOI
  16. 10.1056/NEJMoa1215246 · DOI
  17. 2018, Activities of Thrombin and Factor Xa Are Essential for Replication of Hepatitis E Virus and Are Possibly Implicated in ORF1 Polyprotein Processing, J Virol, 92, 6
  18. 10.1128/JVI.02130-09 · DOI
  19. 10.1099/vir.0.033738-0 · DOI
  20. 10.1046/j.1365-2893.2003.00398.x · DOI
  21. 10.1099/0022-1317-72-9-2197 · DOI
  22. 10.1073/pnas.89.17.8259 · DOI
  23. 10.1021/ic401072d · DOI · Paper page
  24. 1991, Protease digestion of hepatitis A virus: disparate effects on capsid proteins, antigenicity, and infectivity, J Virol, 65, 5636, 10.1128/jvi.65.10.5636-5640.1991 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.04.002 · DOI
  26. 10.1128/JVI.75.14.6249-6255.2001 · DOI
  27. 10.1128/JVI.00189-09 · DOI
  28. 2022, Processing and Subcellular Localization of the Hepatitis E Virus Replicase: Identification of Candidate Viral Factories, Front Microbiol, 13, 828636, 10.3389/fmicb.2022.828636 · DOI
  29. 2021, Isocotoin suppresses hepatitis E virus replication through inhibition of heat shock protein 90, Antiviral Res, 185, 104997, 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104997 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/bib/3.3.275 · DOI
  31. 2022, Hepatitis E virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase is involved in RNA replication and infectious particle production, Hepatology, 75, 170, 10.1002/hep.32100 · DOI
  32. 10.1099/vir.0.066142-0 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.virusres.2013.07.020 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.gene.2015.04.026 · DOI
  35. 2017, Mutational analysis of hepatitis E virus ORF1 “Y-domain”: Effects on RNA replication and virion infectivity, World J Gastroenterol, 23, 590, 10.3748/wjg.v23.i4.590 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.virusres.2013.11.016 · DOI
  37. 10.1099/vir.0.049577-0 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 2019, First Crystal Structure of a Nonstructural Hepatitis E Viral Protein Identifies a Putative Novel Zinc-Binding Protein, J Virol, 93, 13
  40. 10.1002/hep.25505 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/978-3-7091-9300-6_2 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/s007050070093 · DOI
  43. 2019, Hepatitis E Virus Cysteine Protease Has Papain Like Properties Validated by in silico Modeling and Cell-Free Inhibition Assays, Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 9, 478
  44. 10.1186/1743-422X-3-38 · DOI
  45. 10.1073/pnas.1210418109 · DOI
  46. 10.1128/JVI.00146-12 · DOI
  47. 10.1073/pnas.1018878108 · DOI
  48. 10.1099/vir.0.068429-0 · DOI
  49. 10.1186/1743-422X-8-245 · DOI
  50. 2019, Recombinant Hepatitis E Viruses Harboring Tags in the ORF1 Protein, J Virol, 93, 19
  51. 10.1016/0042-6822(91)90760-9 · DOI
  52. 10.1074/jbc.M407787200 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/nature03580 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.coviro.2018.10.001 · DOI
  55. 2021, Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome, Nature, 596, 590, 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1007/s00705-001-0773-3 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.09.014 · DOI
  58. 2019, Sofosbuvir Add-on to Ribavirin Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis E Virus Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Does Not Result in Sustained Virological Response, Open Forum Infect Dis, 6, 8
  59. 10.1006/viro.1999.0168 · DOI
  60. 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2008.05.006 · DOI
  62. 10.1093/nar/28.1.45 · DOI
  63. 10.1006/viro.1999.9968 · DOI
  64. 10.1093/nar/gkg095 · DOI
  65. 10.1093/nar/gkl124 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1128/JVI.00189-09 · DOI
  67. 10.1093/bib/3.3.275 · DOI
  68. 2022, Hepatitis E virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase is involved in RNA replication and infectious particle production, Hepatology, 75, 170, 10.1002/hep.32100 · DOI
  69. 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 2019, First Crystal Structure of a Nonstructural Hepatitis E Viral Protein Identifies a Putative Novel Zinc-Binding Protein, J Virol, 93, 13
  71. 10.1073/pnas.1210418109 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2008.05.006 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
LeDesma, R., Biswas, A., Maya, S., Gili, S., Higgins, J., & Ploss, A.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Ploss, Alexander
ORCID
Venue
eLife
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-06-14
Volume
12
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1101/2022.06.14.496061
PMC
PMC9977285
OpenAlex
W4322488467
Cited by
22
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (T32GM007388, 2039656)
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  • Princeton University (DGE-2039656, R01 AI107301, R01 AI153236, R01 AI146917, R01 AI138797)
  • Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (P30 CA072720)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine
  • National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA072720)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007388)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI138797, AI138797, R01AI146917, AI107301, R01AI153236, R01AI107301)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatitis Viruses Studies and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
hepatitis E virus, papain-like cysteine protease, viral genome replication, protein structure-function relationship, cysteine residues, domain-domain interactions, RNA virus replication
MeSH terms
Calpain, Cations, Divalent, Cysteine, Viral Proteins, Virus Replication, Hepatitis E virus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.