PreprintCited by 4Protein Structure and DynamicsCoral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Utilizing artificial intelligence system to build the digital structural proteome of reef-building corals

Open access
Zhu, Yunchi, Liao, Xin, Han, Tingyu, Chen, J.-Y., He, Chunpeng, Lu, Zuhong·2022·GigaScience

Preprint — published as 10.1093/gigascience/giac117

Abstract

Reef-building corals play an important role in the marine ecosystem, and analyzing their proteomes from a structural perspective will exert positive effects on exploring their biology. Here we integrated mass spectrometry with newly published ColabFold to obtain digital structural proteomes of dominant reef-building corals. 8,382 proteins co-expressed in A. muricata, M. foliosa and P. verrucosa were identified, then 8,166 of them got predicted structures after around 4,060 GPU hours of computation. The resulting dataset covers 83.6% of residues with a confident prediction, while 25.9% have very high confidence. Our work provides insight-worthy predictions for coral research, confirms the reliability of ColabFold in practice, and is expected to be a reference case in the impending high-throughput era of structural proteomics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.06.27.497859

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.2307/1943285 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s11430-012-4449-5 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00009-9 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01252.x · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s00227-014-2524-5 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s12526-019-01021-2 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/bes2.1706 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/s41598-020-60605-2 · DOI
  9. 10.3389/fphys.2021.759370 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110404 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/molbev/mst109 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.1301419110 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/gbe/evaa162 · DOI
  14. 10.1186/s42833-020-00014-x · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1021/ar010126g · DOI
  17. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1186/s12863-022-01038-w · DOI
  19. 10.1145/3503470.3503471 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty1057 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167336 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.3390/proteomes9010015 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/molbev/msz185 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/nar/gkab314 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1110/ps.33302 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/molbev/msab103 · DOI
  28. 10.1126/science.aam6371 · DOI
  29. 10.1126/science.212.4501.1397 · DOI
  30. 10.1073/pnas.84.9.2732 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0955-0674(96)80101-3 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.05.005 · DOI
  33. 10.3390/toxins13080538 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.biochi.2005.12.008 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/nrmicro.2015.3 · DOI
  36. 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00570 · DOI
  37. 10.1101/gr.198701 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/srep29135 · DOI
  39. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01607 · DOI
  40. 10.3390/ijms19030721 · DOI
  41. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001328 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.tim.2020.08.005 · DOI
  43. 10.1128/MMBR.05014-11 · DOI
  44. 10.1093/icb/icz067 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zhu, Y., Liao, X., Han, T., Chen, J.-Y., He, C., & Lu, Z.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering (CN)
  • Guangxi Mangrove Research Center (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • He, Chunpeng
  • Lu, Zuhong
Venue
GigaScience
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-06-30
Volume
11
ISSN
2047-217X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4309665402
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • GigaScience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Southeast University (Sklb2021-k02)
  • State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics (Sklb2021-k02)
  • Guangxi Key Laboratory of Mangrove Conservation and Utilization (GKLMC-202002)
  • Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
reef-building corals, protein structure prediction, ColabFold, Acropora muricata, Pocillopora verrucosa, homologous proteins, mass spectrometry, GPU computing, structural proteomics
MeSH terms
Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Reproducibility of Results, Ecosystem, Proteome, Anthozoa, Coral Reefs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review