PreprintCited by 25Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural Network-Derived Potts Models for Structure-Based Protein Design using Backbone Atomic Coordinates and Tertiary Motifs

Open access
Li, Alex J., Lu, Mindren, Desta, Israel, Sundar, Vikram, Grigoryan, Gevorg, Keating, Amy E.·2022·Protein Science

Preprint — published as 10.1002/pro.4554

Abstract

A bstract: Designing novel proteins to perform desired functions, such as binding or catalysis, is a major goal in synthetic biology. A variety of computational approaches can aid in this task. An energy-based framework rooted in the sequence-structure statistics of tertiary motifs (TERMs) can be used for sequence design on pre-defined backbones. Neural network models that use backbone coordinate-derived features provide another way to design new proteins. In this work, we combine the two methods to make neural structure-based models more suitable for protein design. Specifically, we supplement backbone-coordinate features with TERM-derived data, as inputs, and we generate energy functions as outputs. We present two architectures that generate Potts models over the sequence space: TERMinator, which uses both TERM-based and coordinate-based information, and COORDinator, which uses only coordinate-based information. Using these two models, we demonstrate that TERMs can be utilized to improve native sequence recovery performance of neural models. Furthermore, we demonstrate that sequences designed by TERMinator are predicted to fold to their target structures by AlphaFold. Finally, we show that both TERMinator and COORDinator learn notions of energetics, and these methods can be fine-tuned on experimental data to improve predictions. Our results suggest that using TERM-based and coordinate-based features together may be beneficial for protein design and that structure-based neural models that produce Potts energy tables have utility for flexible applications in protein science. Code: Code will be made publically available at https://github.com/alexjli/terminator_public

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.08.02.501736

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Frappier V and Keating A. E 2021. Data-driven computational protein design. · DOI
  2. Siegel J. B , Zanghellini A , Lovick H. M , Kiss G , Lambert A. R , St.Clair J. L , Gallaher J. L , Hilvert D , Gelb M. H , Stoddard B. L , Houk K. N , Michael F. E , and Baker D 2010. Computational design of an enzyme catalyst for a stereoselective bimolecular Diels-Alder reaction. · DOI
  3. Cao L , Goreshnik I , Coventry B , Case J. B , Miller L , Kozodoy L , Chen R. E , Carter L , Walls A. C , Park Y. J , Strauch E. M , Stewart L , Diamond M. S , Veesler D , and Baker D 2020. De novo design of picomolar SARS-CoV-2 miniprotein inhibitors. · DOI
  4. Leman J. K , Weitzner B. D , Lewis S. M , Adolf-Bryfogle J , Alam N , Alford R. F , Aprahamian M , Baker D , Barlow K. A , Barth P , Basanta B , Bender B. J , Blacklock K , Bonet J , Boyken S. E , Bradley P , Bystroff C , Conway P , Cooper S , Correia B. E , Coventry B , Das R , Jong R. M. D , Dimaio F , Dsilva L , Dunbrack R , Ford A. S , Frenz B , Fu D. Y , Geniesse C , Goldschmidt L , Gowthaman R , Gray J. J , Gront D , Guffy S , Horowitz S , Huang P.-S , Huber T , Jacobs T. M , Jeliazkov J. R , Johnson D. K , Kappel K , Karanicolas J , Khakzad H , Khar K. R , Khare S. D , Khatib F , Khramushin A , King I. C , Kleffner R , Koepnick B , Kortemme T , Kuenze G , Kuhlman B , Kuroda D , Labonte J. W , Lai J. K , Lapidoth G , Leaver-Fay A , Lindert S , Linsky T , London N , Lubin J. H , Lyskov S , Maguire J , Malmström L , Marcos E , Marcu O , Marze N. A , Meiler J , Moretti R , Mulligan V. K , Nerli S , Norn C , Ó’Conchúir S , Ollikainen N , Ovchinnikov S , Pacella M. S , Pan X , Park H , Pavlovicz R. E , Pethe M , Pierce B. G , Pilla K. B , Raveh B , Renfrew P. D , Burman S. S. R , Rubenstein A , Sauer M. F , Scheck A , Schief W , Schueler-Furman O , Sedan Y , Sevy A. M , Sgourakis N. G , Shi L , Siegel J. B , Silva D.-A , Smith S , Song Y , Stein A , Szegedy M , Teets F. D , Thyme S. B , Wang R. Y.-R , Watkins A , Zimmerman L , and Bonneau R 2020. Macromolecular modeling and design in rosetta: recent methods and frameworks. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Strokach A , Becerra D , Corbi-Verge C , Perez-Riba A , and Kim P. M 2020. Fast and flexible protein design using deep graph neural networks. · DOI
  6. Dauparas J , Anishchenko I , Bennett N , Bai H , Ragotte R. J , Milles L. F , Wicky B. I. M , Courbet A , De Haas R. J , Bethel N , Leung P. J. Y , Huddy T. F , Pellock S , Tischer D , Chan F , Koepnick B , Nguyen H , Kang A , Sankaran B , Bera A. K , King N. P , and Baker D 2022. Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Zhou J , Panaitiu A. E , and Grigoryan G 2020. A general-purpose protein design framework based on mining sequence-structure relationships in known protein structures. · DOI
  8. Mackenzie C. O , Zhou J , and Grigoryan G 2016. Tertiary alphabet for the observable protein structural universe. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Zheng F , Zhang J , and Grigoryan G 2015. Tertiary structural propensities reveal fundamental sequence/structure relationships. · DOI
  10. Zheng F and Grigoryan G 2017. Sequence statistics of tertiary structural motifs reflect protein stability. · DOI
  11. Frappier V , Jenson J. M , Zhou J , Grigoryan G , and Keating A. E 2019. Tertiary structural motif sequence statistics enable facile prediction and design of peptides that bind anti-apoptotic Bfl-1 and Mcl-1. · DOI
  12. Wootton J. C and Federhen S 1993. Statistics of local complexity in amino acid sequences and sequence databases. · DOI
  13. Zhang Y and Skolnick J 2004. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Zhang Y and Skolnick J 2005. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Singh R , Letai A , and Sarosiek K 2019. Regulation of apoptosis in health and disease: the balancing act of BCL-2 family proteins. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Jenson J. M , Xue V , Stretz L , Mandal T , Reich L. L , and Keating A. E 2018. Peptide design by optimization on a data-parameterized protein interaction landscape. · DOI
  17. Foight G. W and Keating A. E 2015. Locating herpesvirus Bcl-2 homologs in the specificity landscape of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. · DOI
  18. Rocklin G. J , Chidyausiku T. M , Goreshnik I , Ford A , Houliston S , Lemak A , Carter L , Ravichandran R , Mulligan V. K , Chevalier A , Arrowsmith C. H , and Baker D 2017. Global analysis of protein folding using massively parallel design, synthesis, and testing. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hsu C , Verkuil R , Liu J , Lin Z , Hie B , Sercu T , Lerer A , and Rives A 2022. Learning inverse folding from millions of predicted structures. · DOI
  20. Grigoryan G , Reinke A. W , and Keating A. E 2009. Design of protein-interaction specificity gives selective bZIP-binding peptides. · DOI
  21. Edgar R. C 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. · DOI
  22. Camacho C , Coulouris G , Avagyan V , Ma N , Papadopoulos J , Bealer K , and Madden T. L 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Mirdita M , Schütze K , Moriwaki Y , Heo L , Ovchinnikov S , and Steinegger M 2022. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Steinegger M and Söding J 2017. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. · DOI
  25. Pires J. R , Taha-Nejad F , Toepert F , Ast T , Hoffmüller U , Schneider-Mergener J , Kühne R , Macias M. J , and Oschkinat H 2001. Solution structures of the YAP65 WW domain and the variant L30 K in complex with the peptides GTPPPPYTVG, N-(n-octyl)-GPPPY and PLPPY and the application of peptide libraries reveal a minimal binding epitope. · DOI
  26. Mcknight C. J , Matsudaira P. T , and Kim P. S 1997. NMR structure of the 35-residue villin headpiece subdomain. · DOI
  27. Luh L. M , Hänsel R , Löhr F , Kirchner D. K , Krauskopf K , Pitzius S , Schäfer B , Tufar P , Corbeski I , Güntert P , ET AL. 2013. Molecular crowding drives active Pin1 into nonspecific complexes with endogenous proteins prior to substrate recognition. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Li, A. J., Lu, M., Desta, I., Sundar, V., Grigoryan, G., & Keating, A. E.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research At MIT (US)
Corresponding author
Keating, Amy E.
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-08-03
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
e4554-e4554
ISSN
0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312116066
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Hertz Foundation
  • Dartmouth College
  • Massachusetts Green High Performance Computing Center
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM132117)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
structure-based protein design, Potts model, terminator, coordinators, protein folding prediction, AlphaFold
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review