PreprintCited by 23DNA Repair MechanismsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PCNA recruits cohesin loader Scc2/NIPBL to ensure sister chromatid cohesion

Open access
Psakhye, Ivan, Kawasumi, Ryotaro, Abe, Takuya, Hirota, Kouji, Branzei, Dana·2022·Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41594-023-01064-x · Paper page

Abstract

Sister chromatid cohesion is essential for faithful chromosome segregation and genome duplication during cell division. Failure to establish cohesion during S phase by the ring-shaped multiprotein complex cohesin leads to genomic instability 1-4 . Replisome-associated proteins are required to generate cohesion by two independent pathways 5 . One mediates conversion of cohesins bound to unreplicated DNA ahead of replication forks into cohesive entities behind them, while the second promotes cohesin de novo loading onto newly-replicated DNAs 6 . The latter process depends on the cohesin loader Scc2/NIPBL and the alternative PCNA loader CTF18-RFC. However, the precise mechanism of de novo cohesin loading during replication is unknown. Here we show that PCNA physically recruits yeast cohesin loader Scc2 via its C-terminal PCNA-interacting protein motif. Binding to PCNA is crucial, as scc2-pip mutant deficient in Scc2-PCNA interaction is defective in cohesion when combined with replisome mutants of the cohesin conversion pathway. Moreover, scc2-pip mutant becomes inviable without its partner Scc4/MAU2 that localizes cohesin loader to centromeres. Importantly, the role of NIPBL recruitment to PCNA for cohesion generation is conserved in vertebrate cells. Our results demonstrate that PCNA, the maestro of replication-linked functions, is also crucially involved in the cohesion establishment through de novo cohesin loading onto replicated DNA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.09.16.508217

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 2019, Organization of chromosomal DNA by SMC complexes, Annu Rev Genet, 53, 445, 10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043633 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/nrm.2016.30 · DOI
  3. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.24.110707.175350 · DOI
  4. 2021, Genome folding through loop extrusion by SMC complexes, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 22, 445, 10.1038/s41580-021-00349-7 · DOI
  5. 10.1534/genetics.107.072876 · DOI
  6. 10.7554/eLife.56611 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.05.022 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80420-7 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1126/science.aaz4475 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/nature12867 · DOI
  11. 10.7554/eLife.59560 · DOI
  12. 10.1126/science.abb0981 · DOI
  13. 2021, SMC complexes are guarded by the SUMO protease Ulp2 against SUMO-chain-mediated turnover, Cell Rep, 36, 109485, 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109485 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.030 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.026 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.03.017 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.06.006 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.062 · DOI
  19. 10.1126/science.1157774 · DOI
  20. 10.1126/science.1157880 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.028 · DOI
  22. 2020, Ctf18-RFC and DNA Pol ε form a stable leading strand polymerase/clamp loader complex required for normal and perturbed DNA replication, Nucleic Acids Res, 48, 8128, 10.1093/nar/gkaa541 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/s41586-022-04759-1 · DOI
  24. 10.1101/gad.348581.121 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.003 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)80007-6 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.017 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.02.027 · DOI
  29. 10.1074/jbc.273.31.19747 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.04.034 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.06.030 · DOI
  32. 10.1371/journal.pone.0193333 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/nar/gkzl030 · DOI
  34. 10.1101/2021.08.15.456425 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Bhaskara, S. Examination of proteins bound to nascent DNA in mammalian cells using BrdU-ChIP-Slot-Western technique. J Vis Exp, e53647 (2016). · DOI
  36. 2021, Targeting chromosome trisomy for chromosome editing, Sci Rep, 11, 18054, 10.1038/s41598-021-97580-1 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/nmeth.1401 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1101/gad.306084.117 · DOI
  39. 10.7554/eLife.33920 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.07.007 · DOI
  41. 10.1073/pnas.1911936117 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/yea.1142 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S1046-2023(05)80158-6 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.009 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.11.038 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.021 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1007/978-1-4939-6358-4_16 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.08.003 · DOI
  49. 10.18632/oncotarget.11982 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/s41467-018-05586-7 · DOI
  51. 10.1186/1472-6750-1-7 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Psakhye, I., Kawasumi, R., Abe, T., Hirota, K., & Branzei, D.
Affiliations
  • IFOM (IT)
  • Tokyo Metropolitan University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Psakhye, Ivan
  • Branzei, Dana
Venue
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-09-16
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
1286-1294
ISSN
1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385948983
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
  • CNR ExploRA (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Takeda Science Foundation
  • Novartis Foundation
  • Uehara Memorial Foundation
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Government
  • University of Oxford
  • Fondazione Umberto Veronesi
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (IG 18976, 23710, 682190, ALTF 561-2014, IG 23710, Rif.22403, 18976)
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22K15040, 22H05072, 21K19235, 19KK0210, 20H04337, 20K06760)
  • H2020 European Research Council (682190)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
sister chromatid cohesion, PCNA, replisome, NIPBL, chromosome segregation, DNA replication, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
MeSH terms
Cohesins, Animals, Chromatids, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cell Cycle Proteins, Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen, Chromosome Segregation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review