Cited by 1,663Ubiquitin and proteasome pathwaysProtein Degradation and InhibitorsPlant Molecular Biology Research

An auxin-based degron system for the rapid depletion of proteins in nonplant cells

Nishimura, Kohei, Fukagawa, Tatsuo, Takisawa, Haruhiko, Kakimoto, Tatsuo, Kanemaki, Masato·2009·Nature Methods

Abstract

Plants have evolved a unique system in which the plant hormone auxin directly induces rapid degradation of the AUX/IAA family of transcription repressors by a specific form of the SCF E3 ubiquitin ligase. Other eukaryotes lack the auxin response but share the SCF degradation pathway, allowing us to transplant the auxin-inducible degron (AID) system into nonplant cells and use a small molecule to conditionally control protein stability. The AID system allowed rapid and reversible degradation of target proteins in response to auxin and enabled us to generate efficient conditional mutants of essential proteins in yeast as well as cell lines derived from chicken, mouse, hamster, monkey and human cells, thus offering a powerful tool to control protein expression and study protein function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.1401

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The AID* tag depletes CTCF with efficiency equivalent to that of the original full-length 231-amino-acid AID tag.

    “We observed equivalent CTCF depletion efficiency with the AID* as with the original full-length 231 amino-acid tag (Nishimura et al., 2009) (data not shown).”
  • The AiD system enables rapid, reversible degradation of essential POIs in cell lines derived from various organisms including chicken, mouse, yeast, and humans.

    “The Kanemaki lab demonstrated this possibility with rapid, reversible degradation of essential POIs in cell lines derived from various organisms including chicken, mouse, yeast, and humans [24].”

    From Advances in targeted degradation of endogenous proteins (2019) · cites this paper as [24]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nishimura, K., Fukagawa, T., Takisawa, H., Kakimoto, T., & Kanemaki, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • National Institute of Genetics (JP)
Corresponding author
Kanemaki, Masato
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2009-11-15
Volume
6
Issue
12
Pages
917-922
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W1965813899
Cited by
1,663
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 112 · 2025: 145 · 2024: 178 · 2023: 152 · 2022: 146 · 2021: 168 · 2020: 150 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 107 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 30
FWCI
6.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
auxin-inducible degron, protein degradation, auxin, SCF ubiquitin ligase, protein stability, yeast, mammalian cell lines
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Chickens, Indoleacetic Acids, Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, SKP Cullin F-Box Protein Ligases, Green Fluorescent Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review