PreprintCited by 16Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence AnalysisProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PrePCI: A structure- and chemical similarity-informed database of predicted protein compound interactions

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1002/pro.4594 · Paper page

Abstract

We describe the Predicting Protein Compound Interactions (PrePCI) database which comprises over 5 billion predicted interactions between nearly 7 million chemical compounds and 19,797 human proteins. PrePCI relies on a proteome-wide database of structural models based on both traditional modeling techniques and the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database. Sequence and structural similarity-based metrics are established between template proteins in the Protein Data Bank, T, that bind small molecules, C, and proteins in the models database, Q. When these metrics pass a sequence threshold value, it is assumed that C also binds to Q with a probability derived from machine learning. If the relationship is based on structure, this probability is based on a scoring function that measures the extent to which C is compatible with the binding site of Q as described in the LT-scanner algorithm. For every predicted complex derived in this way, chemical similarity based on the Tanimoto Coefficient identifies other small molecules that may bind to Q. A likelihood ratio for the binding of C to Q is obtained from naïve Bayesian statistics. The PrePCI algorithm performs well under different validations. It can be queried by entering a UniProt ID for a protein and obtaining a list of compounds predicted to bind to it along with associated probabilities. Alternatively, entering an identifier for the compound outputs a list of proteins it is predicted to bind. Specific applications of the database are described and a strategy is introduced to use PrePCI as a first step in a docking screen.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.09.17.508184

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 2014, Global analysis of protein structural changes in complex proteomes, Nat Biotechnol, 32, 1036, 10.1038/nbt.2999 · DOI
  2. 2021, Dynamic 3D proteomes reveal protein functional alterations at high resolution in situ, Cell, 184, 545, 10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.021 · DOI
  3. 10.3390/biom10101453 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s41467-019-09078-0 · DOI
  5. 10.15252/msb.20188503 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.006 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/s41467-019-13889-6 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1073/pnas.1705381114 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1186/s13321-014-0049-z · DOI
  11. 10.1093/nar/gky1033 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1093/nar/gkaa971 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.7554/eLife.12248 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/jcc.21334 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1021/jm051256o · DOI
  17. 2016, WScore: A Flexible and Accurate Treatment of Explicit Water Molecules in Ligand-Receptor Docking, J Med Chem, 59, 4364, 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00131 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 2021, Reliable and Accurate Solution to the Induced Fit Docking Problem for Protein-Ligand Binding, J Chem Theory Comput, 17, 2630, 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00136 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1021/jm8009958 · DOI
  20. 2019, Ultra-large library docking for discovering new chemotypes, Nature, 566, 224, 10.1038/s41586-019-0917-9 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 2022, Synthon-based ligand discovery in virtual libraries of over 11 billion compounds, Nature, 601, 452, 10.1038/s41586-021-04220-9 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/nbt1284 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 2004, Approaches to Measure Chemical Similarity - A Review, QSAR Comb Sci, 22, 1006
  24. 2010, Similarity searching using 2D structural fingerprints, Methods in molecular biology, 672, 133, 10.1007/978-1-60761-839-3_5 · DOI
  25. 2020, Binding Affinity Prediction by Pairwise Function Based on Neural Network, J Chem Inf Model, 60, 2766, 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00026 · DOI
  26. 10.1073/pnas.2023989118 · DOI
  27. 2021, General Purpose Structure-Based Drug Discovery Neural Network Score Functions with Human-Interpretable Pharmacophore Maps, J Chem Inf Model, 61, 603, 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01001 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq112 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/srep41926 · DOI
  30. 10.1021/ci900043r · DOI
  31. 10.1021/ci500319f · DOI
  32. Wallach I , Dzamba M , Heifets A (2015) AtomNet: A Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Bioactivity Prediction in Structure-based Drug Discovery. ArXiv:1–11.
  33. Ragoza M , Hochuli J , Idrobo E , Sunseri J , Koes DR (2017) Protein–Ligand Scoring with Convolutional Neural Networks. J Chem Inf Model:942–957. · DOI
  34. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty374 · DOI
  35. Lim H , Poleksic A , Yao Y , Tong H , He D , Zhuang L , Meng P , Xie L (2016) Large-Scale Off-Target Identification Using Fast and Accurate Dual Regularized One-Class Collaborative Filtering and Its Application to Drug Repurposing. PLoS Comput Biol 12. · DOI
  36. Lim H , He D , Qiu Y , Krawczuk P , Sun X , Xie L (2019) Rational discovery of dual-indication multi-target pde/kinase inhibitor for precision anti-cancer therapy using structural systems pharmacology. PLoS Comput Biol 15. · DOI
  37. 2018, FINDSITEcomb2.0: A New Approach for Virtual Ligand Screening of Proteins and Virtual Target Screening of Biomolecules, J Chem Inf Model, 58, 2343, 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00309 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 2021, FRAGSITE: A Fragment-Based Approach for Virtual Ligand Screening, J Chem Inf Model, 61, 2074, 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01160 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3973 · DOI
  40. Marchler-Bauer A , Lu S , Anderson JB , Chitsaz F , Derbyshire MK , DeWeese-Scott C , Fong JH , Geer LY , Geer RC , Gonzales NR , et al. (2011) CDD: A Conserved Domain Database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 39. · DOI
  41. 10.1021/jm300687e · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1021/ci400115b · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1038/s41467-018-02974-x · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1038/s41418-018-0095-6 · DOI
  45. 10.1021/jm0306430 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1038/ncomms3701 · DOI
  47. 10.1021/jm050540c · DOI
  48. 10.1038/s41598-021-81132-8 · DOI
  49. 10.1093/nar/gks1258 · DOI
  50. 10.1093/nar/gky1114 · DOI
  51. 10.1002/prot.10550 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/nmeth.1818 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1186/1758-2946-3-1 · DOI
  54. 10.1021/ci00057a005 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1021/ci100050t · DOI
  56. 2013, Advancing the activity cliff concept, F1000Res, 2, 1
  57. 10.1007/s10822-013-9644-8 · DOI
  58. 10.1021/jm0306430 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1021/jm030644s · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Trudeau, S. J., Hwang, H., Mathur, D., Begum, K., Petrey, D., Murray, D., & Honig, B.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Schrodinger (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Murray, Diana
  • Honig, Barry
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-09-19
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
e4594-e4594
ISSN
0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4320494012
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od032433-01a1)
  • National Cancer Institute (U54CA209997)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (S06GM008224, T32GM008224, T32GM145440, R35GM139585)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein structure model, AlphaFold, structural similarity, sequence similarity, molecular similarity, Tanimoto coefficient, likelihood ratios, drug target prediction, lead compound identification, mechanism of action
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Humans, Proteins, Databases, Protein, Databases, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review