PreprintCited by 53vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesArtificial Immune Systems ApplicationsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DeepAIR: a deep-learning framework for effective integration of sequence and 3D structure to enable adaptive immune receptor analysis

Open access
Zhao, Yu, He, Bing, Li, Chen, Xu, Zhimeng, Su, Xiaona, Rossjohn, Jamie, Song, Jiangning, Yao, Jianhua·2022·Science Advances

Preprint — published as 10.1126/sciadv.abo5128

Abstract

Structural docking between the adaptive immune receptors (AIRs), including T cell receptors (TCRs) and B cell receptors (BCRs), and their cognate antigens is one of the most fundamental processes in adaptive immunity. However, current methods for predicting AIR-antigen binding largely rely on sequence-derived features of AIRs, omitting the structure features that are essential for binding affinity. In this study, we present a deep-learning framework, termed DeepAIR, for the accurate prediction of AIR-antigen binding by integrating both sequence and structure features of AIRs. DeepAIR consists of three feature encoders (a trainable-embedding-layer-based gene encoder, a transformer-based sequence encoder, and a pre-trained AlphaFold2-based structure encoder), a gating-based attention mechanism to extract important features, and a tensor fusion mechanism to integrate obtained features. We train and evaluate DeepAIR on three downstream prediction tasks, including the prediction of AIR-antigen binding affinity, the prediction of AIR-antigen binding reactivity, and the classification of the immune repertoire. On five representative datasets, DeepAIR shows outstanding prediction performance in terms of AUC (area under the ROC curve) in predicting the binding reactivity to various antigens, as well as the classification of immune repertoire for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). DeepAIR is freely available for academic purposes at https://github.com/TencentAILabHealthcare/DeepAIR . We anticipate that DeepAIR can serve as a useful tool for characterizing and profiling antigen binding AIRs, thereby informing the design of personalized immunotherapy. Highlights: Integrating predicted AIR structures using AlphaFold2 significantly improves the prediction accuracy of the binding reactivity between AIRs and antigens. DeepAIR is featured by a novel deep learning architecture that leverages both the gating-based attention mechanism and tensor fusion mechanism to effectively extract and integrate informative features from three feature encoders, including a trainable embedding-layer-based gene encoder, a transformer-based sequence encoder, and a pre-trained AlphaFold2-based structure encoder. DeepAIR is implemented as a biologically interpretable deep learning framework that highlights the key residues in both α and β chains that are critical for predicting the AIR-antigen binding.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.09.30.510251

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.001 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00185-4 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.it.2016.10.003 · DOI
  4. 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00302 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/s41577-018-0007-5 · DOI
  6. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032414-112334 · DOI
  7. 2021, DeepTCR is a deep learning framework for revealing sequence concepts within T-cell repertoires, Nat. Commun, 12, 1605, 10.1038/s41467-021-21879-w · DOI
  8. Zhang, W. et al. A framework for highly multiplexed dextramer mapping and prediction of T cell receptor sequences to antigen specificity. Sci Adv 7, (2021). · DOI
  9. Isacchini, G. , Walczak, A. M. , Mora, T. & Nourmohammad, A. Deep generative selection models of T and B cell receptor repertoires with soNNia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118, (2021). · DOI
  10. 2016, Robust estimates of overall immune-repertoire diversity from high-throughput measurements on samples, Nat. Commun, 7, 11881, 10.1038/ncomms11881 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/334395a0 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 2020, Methods for sequence and structural analysis of B and T cell receptor repertoires, Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J, 18, 2000, 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.07.008 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/nature22976 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/s41588-018-0339-x · DOI
  15. 10.1038/nature22383 · DOI
  16. 10.1126/science.abe9124 · DOI
  17. 2021, A LoCK at the T cell dock, Science (New York, N.Y, 372, 1038, 10.1126/science.abj2937 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/ni942 · DOI
  19. 10.1074/jbc.M109.022509 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.03015.x · DOI
  22. 2021, TCRdb: a comprehensive database for T-cell receptor sequences with powerful search function, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, D468, 10.1093/nar/gkaa796 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 2022, SARS-CoV-2 antigen exposure history shapes phenotypes and specificity of memory CD8+ T cells, Nat. Immunol, 23, 781, 10.1038/s41590-022-01184-4 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/nar/gkq888 · DOI
  25. 2018, History, applications, and challenges of immune repertoire research, Cell Biol. Toxicol, 34, 441, 10.1007/s10565-018-9426-0 · DOI
  26. 2021, Comprehensive single-cell sequencing reveals the stromal dynamics and tumor-specific characteristics in the microenvironment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Nat. Commun, 12, 1540, 10.1038/s41467-021-21795-z · DOI
  27. Boland, B. S. et al. Heterogeneity and clonal relationships of adaptive immune cells in ulcerative colitis revealed by single-cell analyses. Sci Immunol 5, (2020). · DOI
  28. 2020, T-cell repertoire analysis and metrics of diversity and clonality, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol, 65, 284, 10.1016/j.copbio.2020.07.010 · DOI
  29. 2020, Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning, Nature, 577, 706, 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1126/science.2832942 · DOI
  31. 10.4049/jimmunol.181.11.7853 · DOI
  32. Rosati, E. et al. Overview of methodologies for T-cell receptor repertoire analysis. BMC Biotechnol. 17, (2017). · DOI
  33. 2021, An expanded benchmark for antibody-antigen docking and affinity prediction reveals insights into antibody recognition determinants, Structure, 29, 606, 10.1016/j.str.2021.01.005 · DOI
  34. 2018, Conformational changes in antibody Fab fragments upon binding and their consequences on the performance of docking algorithms, Immunol. Lett, 200, 5, 10.1016/j.imlet.2018.06.002 · DOI
  35. 10.1093/nar/gkaa967 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nmeth.1818 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1093/database/bav120 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/nar/gkw1081 · DOI
  39. 10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1093/nar/29.14.2994 · DOI
  41. Chen, R. J. et al. Pathomic Fusion: An integrated framework for fusing histopathology and genomic features for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging PP, 1–1 (2020).
  42. 10.1109/iccv.2017.404 · DOI
  43. 2018, Multiple instance learning: A survey of problem characteristics and applications, Pattern Recognit, 77, 329, 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.009 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Goodfellow, I. , Bengio, Y. & Courville, A. Deep Learning. (MIT Press, 2016).
  45. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-77 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1002/9780471462422.eoct979 · DOI
  47. 10.2307/2531595 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, Y., He, B., Li, C., Xu, Z., Su, X., Rossjohn, J., Song, J., & Yao, J.
Affiliations
  • Tencent (China) (CN)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Zhao, Yu
  • He, Bing
  • Song, Jiangning
  • Yao, Jianhua
Venue
Science Advances
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-10-03
Volume
9
Issue
32
Pages
eabo5128-eabo5128
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385693120
Cited by
53
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 2
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Immune Systems Applications
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
T cell receptor, B cell receptor, binding affinity, sequence-structure integration, deep learning, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, inflammatory bowel disease, immune repertoire
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Antigens, Humans, Receptors, Antigen, B-Cell, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, Adaptive Immunity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review