The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structures of human cytoplasmic dynein in complex with the lissencephaly 1 protein, LIS1
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.7554/elife.84302 · Paper page
Abstract
The lissencephaly 1 protein, LIS1, is mutated in type-1 lissencephaly and is a key regulator of cytoplasmic dynein-1. At a molecular level, current models propose that LIS1 activates dynein by relieving its autoinhibited form. We recently reported a 3.1Å structure of yeast dynein bound to Pac1, the yeast homologue of LIS1, which revealed the details of their interactions (Gillies et al., 2022). Based on this structure, we made mutations that disrupted these interactions and showed that they were required for dynein’s function in vivo in yeast. We also used our yeast dynein-Pac1 structure to design mutations in human dynein to probe the role of LIS1 in promoting the assembly of active dynein complexes. These mutations had relatively mild effects on dynein activation, suggesting that there may be differences in how dynein and Pac1/LIS1 interact between yeast and humans. Here, we report cryo-EM structures of human dynein-LIS1 complexes. Our new structures reveal the differences between the yeast and human systems and provide a blueprint to disrupt the human dynein-LIS1 interaction more accurately. Our new structures also allow us to map type-1 lissencephaly disease mutations, as well as mutations in dynein linked to malformations of cortical development/ intellectual disability, in the context of the human dynein-LIS1 complex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- 10.1107/S2059798318006551 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.93.1.19 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tibs.2020.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1002/humu.10028 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100814-125438 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.037 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsmb.2930 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsomega.9b02946 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41556-020-0501-4 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7554/eLife.71229 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41594-018-0027-7 · DOI
- 10.1038/ejhg.2008.213 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mgene.2016.05.004 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41556-020-0506-z · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.022 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2004.03.024 · DOI
- 10.1042/BST20130188 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.59737 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1254198 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1417422112 · DOI
- 10.1159/000448639 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.3943 · DOI
- 10.1093/hmg/7.13.2029 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-020-00990-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.081 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.201905178 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41580-018-0004-3 · DOI
- 10.1038/364717a0 · DOI
- 10.1111/jnc.13403 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-018-20081-1 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00942.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00146-X · DOI
- 10.15252/embj.201488792 · DOI
- 10.1002/bip.22856 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsmb.2272 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature14023 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/35041000 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.200109046 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.019 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncb3048 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.03372 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature25462 · DOI
- 10.1038/s42003-019-0560-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.07.002 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.6.3.297 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.025 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Reimer, J. M., DeSantis, M. E., Reck-Peterson, S. L., & Leschziner, A. E.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-10-08
- Volume
- 12
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9889085
- OpenAlex
- W4317869419
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 3.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (DRG-2370-19)
- Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research
- National Institutes of Health (NIH-R01)
- University of California, San Diego
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM107214, R35GM145296, R35GM141825)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- LIS1, cytoplasmic dynein-1, PAC1, dynein activation, malformations of cortical development, intellectual disability, cryo-EM structure, pathogenic variants
- MeSH terms
- Dyneins, Endoribonucleases, Humans, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Classical Lissencephalies and Subcortical Band Heterotopias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review