PreprintCited by 4Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMachine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and Dynamics

Vector-clustering Multiple Sequence Alignment: Aligning into the twilight zone of protein sequence similarity with protein language models

Open access
McWhite, Claire D., Singh, Mona·2022·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.1101/gr.277675.123

Abstract

Multiple sequence alignment is a critical step in the study of protein sequence and function. Typically, multiple sequence alignment algorithms progressively align pairs of sequences and combine these alignments with the aid of a guide tree. These alignment algorithms use scoring systems based on substitution matrices to measure amino-acid similarities. While successful, standard methods struggle on sets of proteins with low sequence identity - the so-called twilight zone of protein alignment. For these difficult cases, another source of information is needed. Protein language models are a powerful new approach that leverage massive sequence datasets to produce high-dimensional contextual embeddings for each amino acid in a sequence. These embeddings have been shown to reflect physicochemical and higher-order structural and functional attributes of amino acids within proteins. Here, we present a novel approach to multiple sequence alignment, based on clustering and ordering amino acid contextual embeddings. Our method for aligning semantically consistent groups of proteins circumvents the need for many standard components of multiple sequence alignment algorithms, avoiding initial guide tree construction, intermediate pairwise alignments, gap penalties, and substitution matrices. The added information from contextual embeddings leads to higher accuracy alignments for structurally similar proteins with low amino-acid similarity. We anticipate that protein language models will become a fundamental component of the next generation of algorithms for generating MSAs. Software availability: https://github.com/clairemcwhite/vcmsa

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.10.21.513099

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
McWhite, C. D., & Singh, M.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
  • McWhite, Claire D.
  • Singh, Mona
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-10-21
OpenAlex
W4307258884
Cited by
4
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Princeton University
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
multiple sequence alignment, protein language models, vector clustering, low sequence identity, protein structural similarity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review