Vector-clustering Multiple Sequence Alignment: Aligning into the twilight zone of protein sequence similarity with protein language models
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1101/gr.277675.123
Abstract
Multiple sequence alignment is a critical step in the study of protein sequence and function. Typically, multiple sequence alignment algorithms progressively align pairs of sequences and combine these alignments with the aid of a guide tree. These alignment algorithms use scoring systems based on substitution matrices to measure amino-acid similarities. While successful, standard methods struggle on sets of proteins with low sequence identity - the so-called twilight zone of protein alignment. For these difficult cases, another source of information is needed. Protein language models are a powerful new approach that leverage massive sequence datasets to produce high-dimensional contextual embeddings for each amino acid in a sequence. These embeddings have been shown to reflect physicochemical and higher-order structural and functional attributes of amino acids within proteins. Here, we present a novel approach to multiple sequence alignment, based on clustering and ordering amino acid contextual embeddings. Our method for aligning semantically consistent groups of proteins circumvents the need for many standard components of multiple sequence alignment algorithms, avoiding initial guide tree construction, intermediate pairwise alignments, gap penalties, and substitution matrices. The added information from contextual embeddings leads to higher accuracy alignments for structurally similar proteins with low amino-acid similarity. We anticipate that protein language models will become a fundamental component of the next generation of algorithms for generating MSAs. Software availability: https://github.com/clairemcwhite/vcmsa
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Protein 3D Structure Computed from Evolutionary Sequence Variation
Marks, D. S., Colwell, L. J., Sheridan, R., Hopf, T. A., Pagnani, A., Zecchina, R., & Sander, C. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028766 · Cited by 1,144 · see citing works
Evaluating Protein Transfer Learning with TAPE
Rao, R., Bhattacharya, N., Thomas, N., Duan, Y., Chen, X., Canny, J., Abbeel, P., & Song, Y. S. (2019) · doi:10.1101/676825 · Cited by 719 · see citing works
Learning the protein language: Evolution, structure, and function
Bepler, T., & Berger, B. (2021) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2021.05.017 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
Single-sequence protein structure prediction using language models from deep learning
Chowdhury, R., Bouatta, N., Biswas, S., Rochereau, C., Church, G. M., Sorger, P. K., & AlQuraishi, M. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.02.454840 · Cited by 455 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Here we consider a new approach to determining the similarities between amino acids across proteins, based upon protein language models (Chowdhury et al. 2021; Elnaggar et al. 2020; Rao et al. 2019; Bepler and Berger 2021; Rives et al. 2021).”
MethodSingle-sequence protein structure prediction using a language model and deep learning
Chowdhury, R., Bouatta, N., Biswas, S., Floristean, C., Kharkar, A., Roy, K., Rochereau, C., Ahdritz, G., Zhang, J., Church, G. M., et al. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01432-w · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- McWhite, C. D., & Singh, M.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- McWhite, Claire D.
- Singh, Mona
- Venue
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-10-21
- OpenAlex
- W4307258884
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Princeton University
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- multiple sequence alignment, protein language models, vector clustering, low sequence identity, protein structural similarity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review